- Joined
- Nov 11, 2013
- Posts
- 4,794
- Reaction score
- 10,298
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
The chicken Little brigade is out in force today
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

I get the frustration. But I don't get the negativity towards the club for it. I'd understand the negativity if we rushed him like the Pies did and completely stuffed him up. But negativity towards the club for going week by week and doing what's in Freeman's best interest in the long run? No. I don't understand that at all.it comes from this..
Freeman suffers hamstring strain
St Kilda recruit Nathan Freeman has suffered a strain in his right hamstring.
9:12pm Dec 16, 2015
Saints confident Freeman can beat hamstring issues
St Kilda’s high performance team believe that with some technique alterations, talented midfield recruit Nathan Freeman can get on top of his hamstring problems once and for all and prosper at the elite leve
11:09am Dec 21, 2015
Saints get back to work
Off-season recruit Nathan Freeman trained away from the main group as he continues his rehabilitation program following a minor setback with his troublesome hamstring prior to the break.
Injury Update: Billings on track
Off-season recruit Nathan Freeman still remains a work in progress, with the highly-rated midfield prospect continuing the rehabilitation program for his troublesome hamstrings.
5:19pm Jan 27, 2016
Plus the Article from today saying that he is 2 weeks away from the main group. If yea read the article on the 16th of December it says that he will be back to full training after Christmas/New Year. Fast forward to almost middle of Feb and it looks as though he still wont be joining the main group up until the start of march.
Can you understand the negativity with the club always saying a week or 2 and its ballooned out to over 2 months already. Cant they just say he is indefinite and on a modified program instead always a week or 2 away. Not that hard really. Just gives us false hope.
If you read the article today on afl.com.au richo clearly says he could play preseason games. It's the choice of coaches and medicos to not allow him too. That to me says the guy is fit. Billings in his interview says Freo is fit,the medicos are holding him back trying to make his hammy bullet proof
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I get the frustration. But I don't get the negativity towards the club for it. I'd understand the negativity if we rushed him like the Pies did and completely stuffed him up. But negativity towards the club for going week by week and doing what's in Freeman's best interest in the long run? No. I don't understand that at all.
Well you just got a timeline, no preseason games means he has 6 weeks for round 1 of the vflI dont want to rush the kid back, and to be honest if he spent the whole year training and not playing any games that would bother me at all. What does grind my gears about the club is how they report injuries in particular. Also a week or 2 away when for example last season Billings missed a month then had stress fractures. But they were reporting it for a month thats its soreness and he would be alright next week. I just wish they would say that we dont have a definite time frame of Freeman and leave it at that instead of 1 week here 2 weeks there.
Well you just got a timeline, no preseason games means he has 6 weeks for round 1 of the vfl
Look big fella,I'm not going to argue with you. It's to exhaustingWell you'd hope so considering has has had 4 month of getting over a strain and being included in the main group.
Obv you have your opinion and i have mine on how the clubs reports on certain things, so we will leave it at that.Look big fella,I'm not going to argue with you. It's to exhausting
This describes the issue nicely - Nathan is being carefully managed in order to ensure his career with us is as fruitful as possible.I don't think the club is trying to trick anybody with Freeman. If the medicos say that he should be ready to rejoin main group in a week and then he's not quite there in that timeframe then it gets pushed back.
Like Stavro said the medicos/physiologists/trainers/biomechanists etc etc have taken on Nathan as a unique project. What we need to do is train and conditions Nathan's body to a whole new way of moving and distributing energy. What the issue is/was is that his hamstrings were doing more heavy lifting than what they should because of various different factors.
To do this his body goes through a total re-program, other muscles are now doing the work they should have been doing originally. He needs time to get adjusted but I have no doubt he plays some senior footy this year and gets us all really excited for what he can achieve from 2017 on.
As much bad press as Nathan's "chronic" hamstring issues have had, keep in mind he's only done one serious tear in his debut season. Last year he had some serious scar tissue issues around the tendon from his original surgery which prevented him from extending fully or having and confidence in it. This year he had a sore spot, I wouldn't even say it was a strain. But because of his history we took the cautious approach.
Haven't heard of many 'minor strains' that keep people in the rehab group for 6 weeks. No doubt we're being cautious but if he's still '2 weeks away' that's 2 months for a strain, which I don't believe for a second.
This describes the issue nicely - Nathan is being carefully managed in order to ensure his career with us is as fruitful as possible.
No amount of pessimism will speed up his recovery, nor would optimism. Just try and be patient so that you don't stress the rest of us, please.
Amen - we all know Freeman was a longer term project and that the club is being cautious in how they approach his training. I'm happy.
I still think about Luke Ball and to a lesser extent Kosi and what they both could have been if they were managed better through injuries....
Xavier Clarke also, could have been absolutely anything.
Why did Freeman leave Collingwood? A huge part of his decision was that he was forced back too soon from an injury which resulted in him subsequently missing nearly another whole season. We are doing the exact opposite which is the right thing to do by both the player and our club.
We rate Nathan as a blue chip investment and we will do whatever it takes to make sure that he's given the best opportunity to produce when we need him the most.
The supporters in here complaining that he's not back to full training would also be the first to question the club if he reinjured himself because he was rushed back.
We are playing the long game, let's give the club and the kid time to get to the required physical conditioning. And as of right now Nathan's hamstrings are in healthy condition, let's let the club do their best to keep it that way.
it comes from this..
Freeman suffers hamstring strain
St Kilda recruit Nathan Freeman has suffered a strain in his right hamstring.
9:12pm Dec 16, 2015
Saints confident Freeman can beat hamstring issues
St Kilda’s high performance team believe that with some technique alterations, talented midfield recruit Nathan Freeman can get on top of his hamstring problems once and for all and prosper at the elite leve
11:09am Dec 21, 2015
Saints get back to work
Off-season recruit Nathan Freeman trained away from the main group as he continues his rehabilitation program following a minor setback with his troublesome hamstring prior to the break.
Injury Update: Billings on track
Off-season recruit Nathan Freeman still remains a work in progress, with the highly-rated midfield prospect continuing the rehabilitation program for his troublesome hamstrings.
5:19pm Jan 27, 2016
Plus the Article from today saying that he is 2 weeks away from the main group. If yea read the article on the 16th of December it says that he will be back to full training after Christmas/New Year. Fast forward to almost middle of Feb and it looks as though he still wont be joining the main group up until the start of march.
Can you understand the negativity with the club always saying a week or 2 and its ballooned out to over 2 months already. Cant they just say he is indefinite and on a modified program instead always a week or 2 away. Not that hard really. Just gives us false hope.
Can you point out where the club has stated 'he's 2 weeks away' outside of today? All that you have posted there suggests that the club has kept him on his program since December 16 & today has said that he'll join the main group for all training in a fortnight.
They haven't said '2 weeks' continually & it sounds like he's in full training with the exception of any match simulation stuff. Thus a somewhat conservative approach would you say?
They haven't said indefinite because he hasn't been assessed as indefinite!
Can you point out where the club has stated 'he's 2 weeks away' outside of today? All that you have posted there suggests that the club has kept him on his program since December 16 & today has said that he'll join the main group for all training in a fortnight.
They haven't said '2 weeks' continually & it sounds like he's in full training with the exception of any match simulation stuff. Thus a somewhat conservative approach would you say?
They haven't said indefinite because he hasn't been assessed as indefinite!
Can you point out where the club has stated 'he's 2 weeks away' outside of today? All that you have posted there suggests that the club has kept him on his program since December 16 & today has said that he'll join the main group for all training in a fortnight.
They haven't said '2 weeks' continually & it sounds like he's in full training with the exception of any match simulation stuff. Thus a somewhat conservative approach would you say?
They haven't said indefinite because he hasn't been assessed as indefinite!