List Mgmt. Collingwood Trade Talk 2016 Part 3

[MagpieJoel]

In other news, Ben Cousins has been arrested again.

 

[unplugged]

So Brisbane's selections now as follows:

3, 16, 21, 22, 78, 96, 114.

Gold Coast as follows:

4, 8, 24, 26, 44, 62, 67, 80, 98, 116.

Soon to add 6 and 10, subject to shuffling or losing their later picks.

 

[Jekyll and Hyde]

GC 44,62 & 67 for Witts.
Points equal pick 33.
Get it done pies.

 

[Unknown Identity]

Jamie Elliott on the training track #moist

 

[Lethal06]

So Brisbane's selections now as follows:

3, 16, 21, 22, 78, 96, 114.

Gold Coast as follows:

4, 8, 24, 26, 44, 62, 67, 80, 98, 116.

Soon to add 6 and 10, subject to shuffling or losing their later picks.

What will Brisbane give us for Frost? 78 and Green?

 

[MagpieJoel]

Nankervis from Sydney has requested a trade to Richmond.

 

[SApies]

Bracing myself for Apex36 standard "It's 10am why haven't we signed anyone yet" post

 

[Bay Pie]

Looks pumped to be there.

 

[Jekyll and Hyde]

Frost + 28 for lions 22.
Get it done pies.

 

[unplugged]

Nankervis requesting a trade to Richmond.

Do Sydney need a ruckman now or?

 

[Apex36]

It's 10.12am. How many trades have we completed?

 

[Lethal06]

Looks pumped to be there.

Happier than Mayne looked!

 

[Apex36]

GC 44,62 & 67 for Witts.
Points equal pick 33.
Get it done pies.

You know the AFL changed the rules so you can't hoarde late picks for points right?

 

[Apex36]

Nankervis requesting a trade to Richmond.

Do Sydney need a ruckman now or?

Nah he was like 4th in line. Watch Sydney supporters come out and say he's worth more than Witts.

 

[Anzacday]

You know the AFL changed the rules so you can't hoarde late picks for points right?

I understood it to be you couldn't have more picks than available spots on your list?

 

[JustInsideFifty]

Can see Brisbane trading 22 to GWS for 37 + 51 + 55 or similar - apart from Frost they have 2 academy players expected to go mid - late.

 

[NT.Thunder]

Jamie Elliott on the training track #moist

 

[Apex36]

I understood it to be you couldn't have more picks than available spots on your list?

Yep. I'm not in favour of grabbing 3 picks because they = points, which is what the post I was replying to was implying. Too much risk in making the trades picks void because of a lack of list spots.

 

[Stoods]

Jamie Elliott on the training track #moist

How do you know this? O:

 

[MagpieJoel]

How do you know this? O:

Mark Stevens on Twitter.

 

[Jekyll and Hyde]

You know the AFL changed the rules so you can't hoarde late picks for points right?

Yep, but we have spots on the list.
If we combine picks for points at the draft and upgrade rookies, smith and keeffe then we can do it.

 

[Stoods]

Mark Stevens on Twitter.

That's great news! Hopefully full training after the Christmas break!

 

[jdpie]

Nah he was like 4th in line. Watch Sydney supporters come out and say he's worth more than Witts.

even better watch (or listen) to the guys on Trade Radio suggest he is of greater value than Witts

 

[Scodog10]

You know the AFL changed the rules so you can't hoarde late picks for points right?

You can still do that, but you don't get the pick added out the back. If it takes that many you need to make sure you have enough to meet your draft quota and if you have too many you just pass.

 

[Lethal06]

Frost + 28 for lions 22.
Get it done pies.

Is moving up six spots in 2nd round really of any proven value? Statistically, does pick 22 produce better outcomes than pick 28? It's hard enough finding a sure winner in the top 10. I'd have thought it a bit of a lottery once the picks move into the 20's. Very hit and miss.