- Joined
- Sep 21, 2004
- Posts
- 47,946
- Reaction score
- 56,522
- AFL Club
- GWS
Oppression? Martyrdom?Don't bother; no matter what you write in this thread, there will be angry lefties here ready to pounce on your free opinion anyway.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Oppression? Martyrdom?Don't bother; no matter what you write in this thread, there will be angry lefties here ready to pounce on your free opinion anyway.
I thought Assange chose his words carefully in saying that it wasn't the Russian Government?Assange might personally know of all of Wikileaks' sources. I'd imagine he'd be pretty wary of outside actors trying to pass disinformation through Wikileaks to discredit it, so he'd need to vet its contributors.
Having said that, anything is possible in the end. Truthfully Assange can only state that the Russians weren't involved to the best of his own knowledge, unless he himself was the hacker.
Opinions are just that. You're entitled to yours and he to his. If you want your opinion to carry any weight then it's a good idea to bring some facts and logic along for the ride.Don't bother; no matter what you write in this thread, there will be angry lefties here ready to pounce on your free opinion anyway.
I thought Assange chose his words carefully in saying that it wasn't the Russian Government?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
i just cannot understand the logic of the left, on one hand they berate Trump for his 'hatred' of women and on the other hand will bend over backwards for muslims who of course just 'love' womens rights. I mean what is the greater threat and how do you justify the logic?
I saw an interview (Pilger?) where he said the emails came from inside a DNC building in Washington. An officials computer.I thought Assange chose his words carefully in saying that it wasn't the Russian Government?
I know what i heard, but cant remember which interview (cnbc?).They assume a sanders staffer did what was morally required in the circumstances. Hillary cheated her way to the democratic nomination. Hence why a big deal was made about Russians, cover up infighting and corruption.Is that the RT interview? Thought he said he didn't know?
Didn't hear that but I was aware he was choosing his words carefully.
Fair enough, I am not sureI know what i heard, but cant remember which interview (cnbc?).They assume a sanders staffer did what was morally required in the circumstances. Hillary cheated her way to the democratic nomination. Hence why a big deal was made about Russians, cover up infighting and corruption.
From 9:15.
If you have sensitive little ears, I suggest you grow the **** up.
Not sure if you're joking.Never thought I would see a Sargon vid here

Sargon is one of the better you tubersNot sure if you're joking.![]()
False equivalence - the lowest form of propaganda- what do you suggest they all get around in pearls and twinsets?
You cant flash your private parts to sell your music and then claim someone else is degrading you. Anyone with talent doesn't need to do that in the first place. Adele has topped the charts for years with great songs and vocal talent without resorting to these tactics.
Just out of interest, what other rights does a woman give up when she fails to dress in a demure fashion?
You cant flash your private parts to sell your music and then claim someone else is degrading you. Anyone with talent doesn't need to do that in the first place. Adele has topped the charts for years with great songs and vocal talent without resorting to these tactics.
