Remove this Banner Ad

Preview Rnd 6 - Carlton v Hawthorn Sunday April 28th 3.20PM @ UTAS - Team Post #1331

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr_Plow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Really not a fan of the change, going 4 talls has never really worked for us in the past and can't see it working now.

REally hoping he is a late out for Cuningham. The fact the blues website has the phrase "Should Curnow play" gives me some hope.
Looking forward to seeing the hawks waltz out of our forward line again.

At least we got one week of a balanced side :)
Structure is going to be a challenge.

Take an already top heavy forward line side and bring in a tall forward for a small.

Unless, of course, we are being bullshitted..........
4 talls ...... please no, not again ...
Unless Charlie isn't right and is a late change or is playing somewhere more up the ground, that is not the right way to go here.

Of course Stratton and Shiels return when we play them. Just our luck.
A lot of complaining about 4 talls but it isn’t really. Curnow adds to last weeks side. Polson was non existent. We could leave Curnow on the bench for the whole game and we’d be just as good as last week.

They’ve also brought Stratton and O’Brien in. So they’re pretty tall too.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

A lot of complaining about 4 talls but it isn’t really. Curnow adds to last weeks side. Polson was non existent. We could leave Curnow on the bench for the whole game and we’d be just as good as last week.

They’ve also brought Stratton and O’Brien in. So they’re pretty tall too.

I agree Curnow is a better player than Polson but when has this structure ever really looked good for us? Especially with JSOS playing as well?
 
Not right. Everyone has asked and answered numerous questions. Cuningham didn’t get picked. Move on
Show me where Arrow has answered of mine on his self declared Kennedy V Cuningham debate Soapy? He called the debate then ducked it.
 
A lot of complaining about 4 talls but it isn’t really. Curnow adds to last weeks side. Polson was non existent. We could leave Curnow on the bench for the whole game and we’d be just as good as last week.

They’ve also brought Stratton and O’Brien in. So they’re pretty tall too.

Aha they've walked straight into Bolts trap. And does this means the two shortest coaches in the League have picked the two tallest teams?
 
why 5 KPFs? Bring in Kerr as well, he's been playing well. Need 6KPFs! Bring back Lobbe or Phillips (not both) as well so all 4 of our rucks can be rested.

Kreuzer 50%, then share it out between McKay, Casboult and Lobbe. Bring back Macreadie too. We need at least 15 KPPs and big men.

MORE!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

why 5 KPFs? Bring in Kerr as well, he's been playing well. Need 6KPFs! Bring back Lobbe or Phillips (not both) as well so all 4 of our rucks can be rested.

Kreuzer 50%, then share it out between McKay, Casboult and Lobbe. Bring back Macreadie too. We need at least 15 KPPs and big men.

MORE!

5?

McKay Casboult maybe Charlie. Would never call McGovern a KPF and who’s the other?
 
Look at the end of the day, if we do go in as named, I think we're probably OK.

The reasoning for playing Casboult + big 3 is likely because Cas killed it last week, the big 3 are relatively mobile for their size and so we can leave McKay full time.

Unfortunately, I think it means we are too tall and slow. Fast/agile for your size doesn't mean you're actually fast or agile.

Unpopular opinion, but I think if we are determined to keep McKay as a pure forward, we end up choosing best 22 between McGovern and Cas.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom