Is there a reason we are assuming it’s this years first needed for Papley?
All reports I’ve read suggests this years draft is average, next year is supposedly better & Sydney has academy prospects.
Is the pick and trading of future picks around Sydney preferring next years first over this years & obviously then under the rules that makes Martin an issue as it’s assumed that’s next years second.
If the reports on the draft are accurate, it maybe Sydney is willing to take a risk that pick 8 slides out, as they see 2020 pick 10-11 being better than 2019 pick 8
All reports I’ve read suggests this years draft is average, next year is supposedly better & Sydney has academy prospects.
Is the pick and trading of future picks around Sydney preferring next years first over this years & obviously then under the rules that makes Martin an issue as it’s assumed that’s next years second.
If the reports on the draft are accurate, it maybe Sydney is willing to take a risk that pick 8 slides out, as they see 2020 pick 10-11 being better than 2019 pick 8