I bleed Blue
Brownlow Medallist
Who is running * though?
Surely that's not true.
What a bunch of dogs if so.
As a player I would only want to play with guys who are there for the right reason.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Who is running * though?
And the main thing is...I can’t remember what day we got Setterfield and McGovern last year. No clue. I just know going in 2020 I’m delighted we have them.More time goes on, the more I'm thinking we won't see Papley, Eddie and Jack in Navy Blue (and maybe 1-2 others in the Cutler/Butler/Pittonet range) until Wednesday for various reasons.
My time and sanity - as well as most of yours - would probably be better off used on more productive things.
So what do you do when stuff actually happens?Sooooooo, a whole week of nuthin’ hey.
Deserves a.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It does seem odd, you can't take our players, but we can bring in your players.
Some of these confirmed trades are doing my head in. So involved. So many pieces to the jigsaw.
I pine for simpler time when milk and bread were cheap. Cigarettes and grog as well. Petrol was sold in gallons. The Footy Record was half the size and printed in black and white. It was safe to catch a train after sundown. Kids played in the street. Neighbours talked to each other. I’m just not built for these times. Is that my phone ringing?
Football & club sport in general are hypocritical. We’d turn on Curnow if he left just as much as we’d celebrate Papley for coming.
And a benifactor gives him free rent and a brown paper bag every week< till next year, how good would that be!As an opposition supporter, this would be the dream. Daniher retires with a year to go. Moves to Sydney. Trains with the club to get his body right. Enters the draft next year.
I bought six new F5 keys in anticipation of next week....
Im sure there's many trades that we don't hear about that dont get done when all is said and done .Betts will happen, Papley will happen and Martin will happen. This has been the consistent line all along from all of the people ITK. Obviously during a trading period, everyone's situation is a bit fluid...if there are swapping of picks involved for example, then they might want to wait until they know exactly what their hand is before they commit. Similarly, if they are paying a portion of the salary, they may want to know exactly what players they have coming in and going out, to make sure that the books stack up. The overall deals are largely agreed upon, it's just the finer details that can vary slightly. We have until the end of Wednesday, if the situation is still like this at 4:45pm on that day, then we can start to panic! Up until then, go off the fact that SOS rarely fails to get the deal that he wants in the end...
Wouldn't be surprised if we'd done our bit in the Betts trade and are just waiting on Adelaide. It's not like that place has a stable 'house' atm.Yet we are not alone
Perhaps our main focus is on Papley, Martin and other players, with Betts being the last consideration
Ah yes, I'm not allowed to voice concerns. Lovely stuff.
I can’t see why Swans won’t accept 9 for Papley.. it’s overs.
The "Welcome Back Eddie" video better be Oscar worthy if they're waiting this long.
I can’t see why Swans won’t accept 9 for Papley.. it’s overs. It’s just the way trade period works, things take a long time with us. Daniher would be holding things up as well but I believe we have had our first serious discussions with the Swans today and possibly an agreement has come to fruition.
then send 25 and 48 to GC for Martin
I think it's fairThat's quite a lot for Martin. = #17
Think we need something back.
Who is running * though?