Tennis - Aus series tournaments

[la47]

Oh I just realised you added them together..

You do understand that the point was that you accumulate the winnings into one bet...

 

[starz]

I was looking at it on the basis of the same stake on each match and accumulating the profit over 100% of stake.

 

[rhino49]

That adds up to 1.50 from where i'm sitting.
But yea roughly works out that way.
Regarding Pratt, i was taking the pi$$ of course..

thanks god! i just assumed you where pissed cause your are usually pretty good on these matters.

 

[HeLMie]

I was looking at it on the basis of the same stake on each match and accumulating the profit over 100% of stake.

That would be pretty stupid now wouldn't it????

Why play under the odds for....

 

[starz]

[/B]

thanks god! i just assumed you where pissed cause your are usually pretty good on these matters.

lol, Hope you didn't back her outright.. lol.
In all seriousness she's playing ok and might make it through a round or two depending on opponent but doubt she'll make it to the quarters.

Is that what you were going to do back Federer in each match instead of outright or was it just a suggestion?

 

[rhino49]

lol, Hope you didn't back her outright.. lol.
In all seriousness she's playing ok and might make it through a round or two depending on opponent but doubt she'll make it to the quarters.

Is that what you were going to do back Federer in each match instead of outright or was it just a suggestion?

just a suggestion, cant back anybody at that short even if it is fed, was looking a value in nadal but with his injury cloud looking at a-rod or safin, think only these 2 can beat fed, but everything would have to go right for them to win but fed no value at 1.40

 

[starz]

just a suggestion, cant back anybody at that short even if it is fed, was looking a value in nadal but with his injury cloud looking at a-rod or safin, think only these 2 can beat fed, but everything would have to go right for them to win but fed no value at 1.40

Didn’t think so, it’s ok in theory, wouldn’t say the calculations are right though.
It’s marginal but I don’t think many people would go through with it backing Fed at 1.01 - 1.02 every match. Can also go against you if you do it that way.

 

[SorryIHammerChicken]

For the Open I reckon Davydenko is worth a shot at 150/1. Went very well last year and while he may not beat the Fed, I think he can get to at least the quarters.

 

[starz]

For the Open I reckon Davydenko is worth a shot at 150/1. Went very well last year and while he may not beat the Fed, I think he can get to at least the quarters.

Retired from the Medibank International yesterday after one set and might not play in the Aus Open, possible stress fractures in his foot apparently.

 

[gothedons]

Clijsters at $6 for the women looks a good bet....