- Sep 9, 2016
- 5,983
- 14,533
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Cannot see sense in that move unless they’re saving tppFinlayson must be a LOT worse than Ladhams
Wtf are Freo giving up to get thatLol 17 and 19 gone
Pick 20 for ccj or gtfo Roos
Richmond will not be using late picks. We’ll try to upgrade and use 4 or 5 picks max.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think so , sound strategy to bring in top end talent over 2y spread rather than one fowl swoopI think you’ll be surprised. It wouldn’t surprise me to see us do a pick swap of one or two of our picks for a couple of quality picks in 2022, knowing we can get a couple of players we want in the 40’s this year.
So I agree we will likely use 4-5, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s picks 7, 15, 26, 42 and 47, with 28 and 38 turned into a couple of 2nd rounders for 2022.
Time will tell ….
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
100% findlayson is a cream player like Dawson at AdelaideCannot see sense in that move unless they’re saving tpp
Cant wait to see who we draft with our first 6 picks.![]()
Mitchell has won a Brownlow!That is as stupid statement as I have ever read. Both play AFL for starters to compare. Graham has won premierships, Mitchell none. If memory serves correct Graham is better in GF's
Makes you wonderWtf are Freo giving up to get that
We would have tabled an offer and it was rejected curious what our offer was , don’t reckon it would have been 26/28 which tbh I think is a good swap , but what would I knowI think its fair to be critical of the club in relation to not getting pick 17 as it was sitting there for the taking.
However, ill hold off until the end of the trade period and even until after draft night before I weigh in.
Right now it doesn't look great, but there's a lot of time to go and if we manage to get pick 2 I'll quickly forget about 17.
If we wanted it though.I think its fair to be critical of the club in relation to not getting pick 17 as it was sitting there for the taking.
However, ill hold off until the end of the trade period and even until after draft night before I weigh in.
Right now it doesn't look great, but there's a lot of time to go and if we manage to get pick 2 I'll quickly forget about 17.
They’ll be used alright trade into next yearAt this rate we're going to go to the draft with 7, 15, 26, 28, and the rest of the picks will go unused.
Spot onIf we wanted it though.
Cost Melb a future 1st to get it. Adelaide coughed up 23.
Really depends who we have on our charts and where they are going to get drafted. For all we know clubs wanted 26 or 28 and wouldn't deal without them. We want to keep them.
fu** knows really but the melts on here are funny as.
Far too many fantasy coaches that know best here

To be fair, hes won 3 bnfs and an AFLPA most valuable player as well. He is better than most.Actually I do not think he is a very good footballer at AFL level.
He is a good footballer, but not a very good footballer.
He only won a Brownlow, lets not get carried away.
Dusty's Norm Smiths carry more weight than a Brownlow.
At least in the Norm Smith the opposition is rated
Best and Fairests carry more weight than a Brownlow.
Brownlow victory just means your team mates where weak in the year you won and your team was not that bad
If we can find a buyerThey’ll be used alright trade into next year
It's definitely a matter of being patient in a long trade period. You can tell who wouldn't be good poker players on this board though.If we wanted it though.
Cost Melb a future 1st to get it. Adelaide coughed up 23.
Really depends who we have on our charts and where they are going to get drafted. For all we know clubs wanted 26 or 28 and wouldn't deal without them. We want to keep them.
fu** knows really but the melts on here are funny as.
Far too many fantasy coaches that know best here
So 22 & 23 are there for the taking now and both will be cheaper than 17. Grab both.View attachment 1254203
we've missed out
To be fair, hes won 3 bnfs and an AFLPA most valuable player as well. He is better than most.
Would be interesting to see how his game would evolve if he was playing in a side that moved the ball forward quickly.
I don’t see the massive obsession with pick 17. Many other options
They got pick 23 back for 17. How can you be critical of that? We didn't have a pick that high...I think its fair to be critical of the club in relation to not getting pick 17 as it was sitting there for the taking.
However, ill hold off until the end of the trade period and even until after draft night before I weigh in.
Right now it doesn't look great, but there's a lot of time to go and if we manage to get pick 2 I'll quickly forget about 17.