It really doesn't make sense for it to have gone on this long simply due haggling over 3rd and 4th round pick swaps.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Correct.It really doesn't make sense for it to have gone on this long simply due haggling over 3rd and 4th round pick swaps.

I feel it is a bit high (wished we'd finish higher up the table and had pick 8 to 12 or around that mark). But I'm not against giving up 5 for Rankine as some on BF feel it is gross overs. You are getting a known quantity with pick 5 you can't guarantee that with a kid. I don't think there is much doubt he is the most exciting player in the comp and has star factor written all over him.
He should be the best my exciting small forward in the comp for a decade. He is going to be elite, and he can win a game or turn a game and as he builds his tank, he can pinch hit in the midfield and hurt. I realise as a small forward it can be feast or famine. If we kept 5 that would become 6 and you can't guarantee who you're getting. Our last pick 6 was Fish. I known quantity bring it on and watch him light it up.
Now as a club let's build a midfield that can get it down there.
This is what we did last year with Dawson. Pick 4 was off the table from the beginning and we only offered late firsts.I find that sort of reasoning a bit odd, ‘Pick 5 for Rankine is the only pick we have so we might as well use it, he’ll be better than a kid at that pick’.
Why did the likes of Brisbane only cough up Pick 12 for a contracted Charlie Cameron, who had very similar upside/potential and stats as Rankine at the same age?
Tanner Bruhn gone for Pick 18?
You don’t give away a top 5 draft pick just because you have it. Same argument could be made for other players being traded into other sides being ‘better than a kid at the draft’
We definitely could have done both IMO
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Getting Rankine?Correct.
Something awful is happening![]()
It really doesn't make sense for it to have gone on this long simply due haggling over 3rd and 4th round pick swaps.
It’s a bit like reading anything by the 5 min fireman, I don’t bother following itWhy is this nonsense wankathon longer than a week now?
Who thought that was a good idea?
No, not really. Just being dramatic.Getting Rankine?
The club's should have 2 weeks internally to sort trades out, and then everything has to be lodged within a 48 hour period.Why is this nonsense wankathon longer than a week now?
Who thought that was a good idea?
It’s like watching an L plater navigate the Dequetteville roundaboutWhy is this nonsense wankathon longer than a week now?
Who thought that was a good idea?
If that's the price for a former top 5 pick , this far inSurely GC and the CROWS are not arguing over which 2023 x 3rd pick ......the Crows or Collingwood's (Frampton)
That's pretty much what happens anywayThe club's should have 2 weeks internally to sort trades out, and then everything has to be lodged within a 48 hour period.
Would be much more entertaining from a supporters standpoint.

IIRC Trade Week was 2 weeks ....due to players requiring medicals & normally having to be contacted overseas, whilst on holidays .....it was also felt the Grand Final teams required the extra space, to review their listWhy is this nonsense wankathon longer than a week now?
Who thought that was a good idea?
We have to be a stingy as possible... look how its working out for geelong...It surely has to do how Reid negotiates. Same every year. Leave it till the final day whilst the rest of the competition seems to get on with. In the meantime we ride the highs and lows and the uncertainty created by the media.
Deal was agreed to days ago but they're currently at a stalemate over which superhero is the coolest. Reid is staying firm on Batman but GC are arguing that he doesn't actually have a super power so he can't be the best.It really doesn't make sense for it to have gone on this long simply due haggling over 3rd and 4th round pick swaps.
You idiot.Deal was agreed to days ago but they're currently at a stalemate over which superhero is the coolest. Reid is staying firm on Batman but GC are arguing that he doesn't actually have a super power so he can't be the best.
No, it’s only gotten longer.IIRC Trade Week was 2 weeks ....due to players requiring medicals & normally having to be contacted overseas, whilst on holidays .....it was also felt the Grand Final teams required the extra space, to review their list
I'm happy with 9 days now
You idiot.
Now we’ll have 5 pages of arguement over whether or not Batman qualifies as a superhero…
That roundabout was always easy af from 3 directions.It’s like watching an L plater navigate the Dequetteville roundabout
Reid is just getting a feel of what's happening on BF.It surely has to do how Reid negotiates. Same every year. Leave it till the final day whilst the rest of the competition seems to get on with. In the meantime we ride the highs and lows and the uncertainty created by the media.