JFK was the original Trump, entitled incompetent douche: his own side shot him. Elvis was paedo crackhead and so most likely was Hitler (defo druggie, probable paedo, also bigoted hatemongering flog ).
Round 6Cripes, 16 games involved listed here.
Votes from the 16 games linked to Brownlow betting scandal revealed
The games that may have been associated have been revealed.www.sen.com.au
Was by far and away best on that game, wasn't even close.Round 6
Fremantle def Carlton
3 Patrick Cripps (Blues)
2 Rory Lobb (Dockers)
1 Alex Pearce (Dockers)
I did notice that Cripps was very short in the live betting , shorter than he should of been.
Given that he won, he actually wasn't short enough. I bet on him for the 22 Brownlow last year so it's not like no-one thought he was a chance.
He only won by a vote, so you can see how cynical people might be suss.
I had him on 30 votes in the Brownlow thread as did others, given he had half a dozen almost certain 3 voters I liked his odds (I don't gamble though so never put any $ on it). Rd 1 vs the Tigs was one which was bamboozling given he was clear BoG to most watchers but the rd 6 game vs the Dockers was arguably his best game for the year and I would have been more shocked if he had have not gotten the 3 in that game.
Do you not know how betting works? You say his odds were suspiciously short yet he won and also wasn't the favourite. The fact that he won shows that his odds should have been even shorter. Even if he had lost by one vote rather than won then that still indicates his odds should have been shorter than they were.
Suss on other umps like the last game where Cripps got 3 in a losing team.
Oh I see, all the umps are in on it and the only legit accolades in the AFL are the ones Richmung got. Not sure how I could have forgotten about that whole thing again. My bad.
I'm just saying that because of this Pell turkey, people are going to be more cynical.
But like anything associated with the Carlolly Crims there is a derisory Asterisk attached to any team or individual achievement
At least you can hold your head high that the Colas earned their choke themselves I guess.
..so if I understand your arguments, if a guy who is longer odds shortens and then wins, his odds should have been shorter because no one knew he was going to win? Nice you wanna stick up for your guy but try to stay coherent bub.
the cops are involved, so the AFL will (hopefully) not have a say in the matter - because, yeah i think if they did they would sweep it under the rug, like the '07 '09 and '11 flags
Yes, 16%. Not 0%.
Thats right we should straight set the rec.. i mean set the record straight.
