Traded Dylan Stephens [Traded with #25 to North for #44 and F-EoF]

[Kangaroos4eva]

It is Stevie J talking Dylan Stephens

15

Dylan Stephens

Age

24

Ht

184cm

Wt

80kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

10.3

3star

K

7.0

3star

HB

3.3

3star

M

3.0

3star

T

1.7

4star

CL

0.0

1star

D

10.3

3star

K

7.0

3star

HB

3.3

2star

M

3.0

3star

T

1.7

3star

CL

0.0

1star

D

10.3

3star

K

7.0

3star

HB

3.3

3star

M

3.0

3star

T

1.7

4star

CL

0.0

1star

on MMM today. 1:11:50 in. Take that for what it's worth.

'He will be representing the Kangaroos in 2024'

 

[Swanssince91]

cmon mate - its a con

What that we fork out one million to do the afls job?

 

[Nutjob]

All best 22 [emoji357]

Overpaying for depth players

The 3 of them have done bugger all and they have taken millions out of your cap… So Carlton


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Kreuuuzeurns]

The 3 of them have done bugger all and they have taken millions out of your cap… So Carlton


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Injury trolling. Not your lowest but pretty low.

 

[.Shotties.]

100%

It’s an absolute meh issue for a club like Sydney.

When you ve got absolute and total access to elite talent for bargain prices every year , plus can offer some of the most unique opportunities outside of football (basically only unique to them , lesser extent the other 3 northern clubs) busting on top 5 picks really is no biggie.

Haha, what the absolute **** is this rubbish? Elite talent every year? Unique opportunities available to us? What?

 

[Pleasedontfail11]

Megatrade

McKay to Sydney on enough cash to get North pick 3
North compensate Sydney by giving them pick 16 for Stephens
Sydney trade 16 for Grundy and Melbourne pay a big wack of his salary balancing out the overpayment on McKay.

 

[Foxman98]

Megatrade

McKay to Sydney on enough cash to get North pick 3
North compensate Sydney by giving them pick 16 for Stephens
Sydney trade 16 for Grundy and Melbourne pay a big wack of his salary balancing out the overpayment on McKay.

Why would North do that?

McKay will easily get 1st round compo regardless

 

[FlyingV]

Megatrade

McKay to Sydney on enough cash to get North pick 3
North compensate Sydney by giving them pick 16 for Stephens
Sydney trade 16 for Grundy and Melbourne pay a big wack of his salary balancing out the overpayment on McKay.

Or… McKay to Sydney/ess/hawthorn with the cash required to get him there, which will unlock pick 3 regardless.

North then pay what’s fair for Stephen’s which is probs a pick late 30s and don’t fleece themselves for no apparent reason.

 

[BloodySwan]

North can walk Stephens to the PSD but between Logue and CCJ they have shown they'd rather give an fare trade than act in bad faith.

 

[Golden_6]

I'd say he's worth bugger all. North's pick 39 or a F3 should get the job done.

 

[Pleasedontfail11]

Why would North do that?

McKay will easily get 1st round compo regardless

McKay might nominate Sydney on 700k because he wants to play finals which would only be band 2. North negotiate by offering Stephens for pick 16 getting Sydney to add more cash to get band one. Sure other clubs might offer McKay more cash but I think Sydney may not. Its just an idea.

 

[Foxman98]

McKay might nominate Sydney on 700k because he wants to play finals which would only be band 2. North negotiate by offering Stephens for pick 16 getting Sydney to add more cash to get band one. Sure other clubs might offer McKay more cash but I think Sydney may not. Its just an idea.

Yes he is going to turn down half a million dollars + to "Play Finals"

Sydney will be similar to the rest of them

 

[Pleasedontfail11]

Or… McKay to Sydney/ess/hawthorn with the cash required to get him there, which will unlock pick 3 regardless.

North then pay what’s fair for Stephen’s which is probs a pick late 30s and don’t fleece themselves for no apparent reason.

Essendon yes. Hawthorn yes. But they probably are not playing finals for a while. But Sydney is playing finals and McKay to Sydney is not a guaranteed band 1 imo. McKay will nominate who he wants. If it is Sydney, well North might have to grease the wheels a bit.

 

[Pleasedontfail11]

Yes he is going to turn down half a million dollars + to "Play Finals"

Sydney will be similar to the rest of them

Half a million? Is someone going to play him 1.2 million? Not sure if you last line is true.

 

[Foxman98]

Half a million? Is someone going to play him 1.2 million? Not sure if you last line is true.

Not sure maths is your strong point,

If Sydney is 700k over 5 years and Essendon/Hawthorn is 800k over 5 years that's 100k more 100k x 5 is 500k 500k is half a million dollars take into account there could be a difference in years and monetary value and yes half a million + would be what he is turning down to "play finals"

 

[Foxman98]

Essendon yes. Hawthorn yes. But they probably are not playing finals for a while. But Sydney is playing finals and McKay to Sydney is not a guaranteed band 1 imo. McKay will nominate who he wants. If it is Sydney, well North might have to grease the wheels a bit.

Hawthorn beat half the top 8 teams this year and almost beat GWS twice to make it 5/8 they aren't that far off

 

[Pleasedontfail11]

Not sure maths is your strong point,

If Sydney is 700k over 5 years and Essendon/Hawthorn is 800k over 5 years that's 100k more 100k x 5 is 500k 500k is half a million dollars take into account there could be a difference in years and monetary value and yes half a million + would be what he is turning down to "play finals"

Na maths is something im good at. But nice personal attack. But in the end its only 50k a year after tax. Plenty of players have turned that down or bigger amounts to play with a club of their choice.

 

[Pleasedontfail11]

Hawthorn beat half the top 8 teams this year and almost beat GWS twice to make it 5/8 they aren't that far off

Maybe. But Sydney looked a lot better overall.

 

[Foxman98]

Na maths is something im good at. But nice personal attack. But in the end its only 50k a year after tax. Plenty of players have turned that down or bigger amounts to play with a club of their choice.

Which is still 250k +

 

[Pleasedontfail11]

Which is still 250k +

Its a lot of money for me. But for Mckay over the next 5 years, there are many other factors that may out weigh that. Life style, finals, weather and anonymity might be more important. But if you read my original post he was still getting his money after North traded in Stephens.

 

[Foxman98]

Its a lot of money for me. But for Mckay over the next 5 years, there are many other factors that may out weigh that. Life style, finals, weather and anonymity might be more important. But if you read my original post he was still getting his money after North traded in Stephens.

His money has nothing to do with the Stephens trade so it is not relevant

 

[The Filth Wizard]

Na maths is something im good at. But nice personal attack. But in the end its only 50k a year after tax. Plenty of players have turned that down or bigger amounts to play with a club of their choice.

Swans and Bombers have plenty of room in their cap to ensure they don't have to be nutting out trades with North. For the sake of say 250k (I've seen it mentioned due to McKay being underage he only needs around 740-750k) it doesn't make sense to give up any trade collateral. The reason clubs target free agents like this as opposed to players simply out of contract is the appeal of the word "free". Any club in the race will want this deal done and signed off by the AFL before trade week kicks off so they can focus on other deals with their picks intact.

 

[BloodySwan]

What McKay's contract is vs the compo the AFL award are not related. This is the exact reason the AFL use their "secret formula" to allow extra discretion when they feel a team needs additional help.

Motlop's contract was not worth a band 2. The AFL did this so the Cats could give additional value to the Suns for Ablett trade.

 

[Cameron_Jezza]

I think swans want 16, it might be
Stephens, 30 for 16 at minimum.

 

[perplexed]

Normally these threads descend into sh!tfights between supporters of the two teams involved. In this one, North and Sydney fans are meh, and it is others coming in looking for drama with panto talk of first rounders, psd, deals with McKay compo, etc.

 

[Bojan KantKick]

I think swans want 16, it might be
Stephens, 30 for 16 at minimum.

That's nice for them isn't it.