Traded Daniel Rioli - Traded with picks 51, 61, 70 & 76 to GC for picks 6 & 26

[Daka]

Stupidity rein's at GC, 6 for him is beyond ridiculous.

I don't even think 6 is overs for Dan Rioli, I rate him highly, the 23 coming back yes it's over but he is in contract & has just come off a B&F win.

 

[A Bit Dusty]

You’ve got two Gibcuses in your best 22 and it’s quite possible that neither of them will be fit

I rate him that he highly we need two of him

 

[Farang83150]

Like the Tim Kelly trade? Real good it did you guys after the one hit wonder flag.
Another stupid decision could be coming in a couple of years when Ried wants out. Not taking those God father offers for pick 1 may come back to bite.

Yeah godfather offers....there were non, your obviously a pricktorian jorno...
Year that one trade defined us didn't it...

 

[Farang83150]

I don't even think 6 is overs for Dan Rioli, I rate him highly, the 23 coming back yes it's over but he is in contract & has just come off a B&F win.

It's a ripoff and everyone knows it.

 

[Jeremias]

You’ve got two Gibcuses in your best 22 and it’s quite possible that neither of them will be fit

I believe the correct terminology is Gibci.

 

[Daka]

It's a ripoff and everyone knows it.

Suns risk 6 getting eaten up for Lombard bid, Rioli is in contract & has B&F win & runner-up in the B&F when we made finals in 2022 only losing to 1 vote to a dominant Lynch, so it debunks oh u only won because Richmond are bottom.

If it was a rip-off the Suns wouldn't do the the deal, they are working with a different currency to other clubs.

If they went to the draft with 6, they would get Lombard but then miss out on Rioli.
This way they get both. they already bringing in a top 10 player in the draft + adding a top 5 player from another club? how is that not a win & you can call it overs/rip off all you like but you need to be prepared to pay overs for contracted players.

 

[Elton Johns Wig]

It's a ripoff and everyone knows it.

Was 8 a rip off for an UNCONTRACTED Saad?

 

[Laffy2Chaffey2Daffy]

GC giving 6 and 23 for Rioli but want a pick in the 30s back for points for Lombard bid, so Richmond working to manufacture that pick.

 

[Coach_Required]

GC giving 6 and 23 for Rioli but want a pick in the 30s back for points for Lombard bid, so Richmond working to manufacture that pick.

Ridiculous if true, considering we already had a pick near that before we paid offers to the Lions for pick 20.

 

[My Cotchin Rules]

Yeah godfather offers....there were non, your obviously a pricktorian jorno...
Year that one trade defined

Link didn't work for some reason.


I think you're stuck in your own 4 walls and just rely on anything you read from BF.

 

[A Bit Dusty]

Ridiculous if true, considering we already had a pick near that before we paid offers to the Lions for pick 20.

I agree we should have kept one of the trades in the 40s and given 51

 

[Pure_Ownage]

Suns risk 6 getting eaten up for Lombard bid, Rioli is in contract & has B&F win & runner-up in the B&F when we made finals in 2022 only losing to 1 vote to a dominant Lynch, so it debunks oh u only won because Richmond are bottom.

If it was a rip-off the Suns wouldn't do the the deal, they are working with a different currency to other clubs.

If they went to the draft with 6, they would get Lombard but then miss out on Rioli.
This way they get both. they already bringing in a top 10 player in the draft + adding a top 5 player from another club? how is that not a win & you can call it overs/rip off all you like but you need to be prepared to pay overs for contracted players.

It is a rip off because rioli is not worth 6 and they would get way more in futures. But gc are stupid and don't know how to trade.

 

[Vindicater]

If Richmond get 6 and 23 for Rioli and send back crappy picks then we need to fold the Suns.

 

[Coach_Required]

It is a rip off because rioli is not worth 6 and they would get way more in futures. But gc are stupid and don't know how to trade.

Geelong fan talking about ripping the suns off in a trade. Bigfooty at its finest.

 

[Daka]

It is a rip off because rioli is not worth 6 and they would get way more in futures. But gc are stupid and don't know how to trade.

You forgetting the Bowes & pick 7?

 

[Laffy2Chaffey2Daffy]

Ridiculous if true, considering we already had a pick near that before we paid offers to the Lions for pick 20.

Freo 10+11+30 for Bolton+24
Rioli+30 for 6+23
QED

If Freo push a hard bargain we could make it 20 instead of 24. May even be better as 24 is the first pick on night 2 which gives it a bit more value.

 

[A Bit Dusty]

You forgetting the Bowes & pick 7?

Technically that wasn't a trade it was a Gift

 

[Chaisa]

Was 8 a rip off for an UNCONTRACTED Saad?

This draft is a fair bit stronger though, plus the pick swaps favoured Carlton not Richmond.

If they got the equivalent of #23 back in points or more (ala the deal Richmond did with Brisbane) I could see the justification even if it's still overs. I don't think a 30's pick really sweetens the deal for Gold Coast though.

It's not as bad as some are claiming, but it's still a hefty amount to pay for a B-grader who's 27. And given how many clubs were desperate for #13, they could've gotten something much better than Rioli for #6.

Actually there is one interesting comp for Gold Coast which worked out well for the club paying "overs" - Dion Prestia. Went for #6 back in 2016 despite being uncontracted and having missed lots of footy with injury. He was quite a bit younger, but that worked out well for Richmond....

 

[Elton Johns Wig]

It is a rip off because rioli is not worth 6

If an uncontracted Saad is worth pick 8, a 3 yr contracted Rioli IS worth pick 6

 

[tigs2010]

Wow looks like Craig has bent over and said give it to me Blair.

What a time to be alive

 

[Elton Johns Wig]

This draft is a fair bit stronger though, plus the pick swaps favoured Carlton not Richmond.

If they got the equivalent of #23 back in points or more (ala the deal Richmond did with Brisbane) I could see the justification even if it's still overs. I don't think a 30's pick really sweetens the deal for Gold Coast though.

It's not as bad as some are claiming, but it's still a hefty amount to pay for a B-grader who's 27. And given how many clubs were desperate for #13, they could've gotten something much better than Rioli for #6.

Contracted 3 yrs
Uncontracted

Even in this draft, that's the difference.

Saad was only 1 yr younger than Dan at the respective trade times too, so the age argument doesn't wash.

Rioli is better than a B grader.

Compare the seasons they had before being traded and Rioli is a way ahead.

 

[THE_GUN]

Not sure where Richmond get the pick in the 30's to get this done and really doesnt make alot of sense

Blair Hartley will probably be demanding #6 + #23 for Rioli + #51 and Cameron provided has enough points for Lombard will just get it done.

 

[T4P]

If Richmond get 6 and 23 for Rioli and send back crappy picks then we need to fold the Suns.

That would make it the first win-win trade the Suns have had

 

[Laffy2Chaffey2Daffy]

GC want points not picks. If Richmond give GC a pick in the 30s plus 51 and 61, that adds up to more points for them than 23 gives them.

 

[boncer34]

Contracted 3 yrs
Uncontracted

Even in this draft, that's the difference.

Saad was only 1 yr younger than Dan at the respective trade times too, so the age argument doesn't wash.

Rioli is better than a B grader.

Compare the seasons they had before being traded and Rioli is a way ahead.

View attachment 2141050

Uh. You know you're comparing apples to pears with the stats yeah?