He only had 1 touch in the last quarter was literally only the 3rd he did anythingPoulter played well in the second half but don't think he is afforded that sort of space against the giants.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
He only had 1 touch in the last quarter was literally only the 3rd he did anythingPoulter played well in the second half but don't think he is afforded that sort of space against the giants.
Not really needed,Keep Darcy and Naughty forward.
Could we bring Buku in to cover down back when Lobb rotates into the ruck?
Not really needed,
In theory Lobb will play on and ruck against Riccardi then they both go to the bench same time match ups stay the same
Given JoD and Buss should play almost full game time and GWS likely on play 2 talls and Stringer forward I'd rather play with the two talls down back whilst Lobb rucks.Keep Darcy and Naughty forward.
Could we bring Buku in to cover down back when Lobb rotates into the ruck?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
As long as we play Buss/Jones + JOD it should always workYep good call
That’s also why I want Sellwood in.As long as we play Buss/Jones + JOD it should always work
That’s also why I want Sellwood in.
If Lobb is in the ruck, I think Sellwood is a much better option to play that third tall role than Cleary.
Sellwood can compete in the air better and just has a bigger frame. Clearly is better off half back and playing on a medium/smaller forward.
Having Lobb in the ruck instead of Darcy makes a ton of sense.
Considering Sellwood has never played senior football, I feel that some may be ‘overly positive’ to what Sellwood can bring us at this stage of the season.
It is starting to head in the Matthew Panos direction circa 2014.
Not sure how Sellwood has basically become the reincarnation of Dale Morris after a few reserves games lol.
Not saying he is not a good player, but we're more likely to bring back Davidson, Buku, or even Anthony Scott this week.
Our back 3 KPD's on the weekend had less than 50 games as defenders.As long as we play Buss/Jones + JOD it should always work

It's also a bit rich throwing him automatically into the AFL team, when others have done preseason and been in and out for the year. If he automatically got in, we'd be in very dire straitsConsidering Sellwood has never played senior football, I feel that some may be ‘overly positive’ to what Sellwood can bring us at this stage of the season.
It is starting to head in the Matthew Panos direction circa 2014.
Considering Sellwood has never played senior football, I feel that some may be ‘overly positive’ to what Sellwood can bring us at this stage of the season.
It is starting to head in the Matthew Panos direction circa 2014.
It's the BF way.Not sure how Sellwood has basically become the reincarnation of Dale Morris after a few reserves games lol.
Not saying he is not a good player, but we're more likely to bring back Davidson, Buku, or even Anthony Scott this week.
It's the BF way.
Any recruit or untried player is a shiny new toy and has to be better than whoever is playing that role now. This overhyping elevates expectations to an unrealistic level and has the effect of turning developing prospects into whipping boys in a very short time.
Best to ignore.
FWIW I'm happy for Sellwood to come in if MC think he's ready.
It's the BF way.
Any recruit or untried player is a shiny new toy and has to be better than whoever is playing that role now. This overhyping elevates expectations to an unrealistic level and has the effect of turning developing prospects into whipping boys in a very short time.
Best to ignore.
FWIW I'm happy for Sellwood to come in if MC think he's ready.
No one is calling for a Walker inclusion. . . Yet.It's the BF way.
Any recruit or untried player is a shiny new toy and has to be better than whoever is playing that role now. This overhyping elevates expectations to an unrealistic level and has the effect of turning developing prospects into whipping boys in a very short time.
Best to ignore.
FWIW I'm happy for Sellwood to come in if MC think he's ready.
You could have said that about Sam Davidson and what a revelation he has been, exactly what we needed.Considering Sellwood has never played senior football, I feel that some may be ‘overly positive’ to what Sellwood can bring us at this stage of the season.
It is starting to head in the Matthew Panos direction circa 2014.
Our fringe forwards played their role - Poulter went really high in the second half to provide an option out of defence, and McNeill had 20+ pressure acts so played his role fine.Poulter played well in the second half but don't think he is afforded that sort of space against the giants.
You've never experienced blind desperate hope until you've seen pages upon pages of praise for Adam Morgan's 0 possession game because "he kept competing".Your post really took me back to circa 2009 when we needed a tall forward and this board hyped Tim Boyle to the moon.
Poulters second half was much better then his first. Im not sure if the shift to lead further up the field was a coach instruction at that time but he should've been playing that role all night.Our fringe forwards played their role - Poulter went really high in the second half to provide an option out of defence, and McNeill had 20+ pressure acts so played his role fine.
Most importantly, Naughts and Darcy were hot so McNeill & Poulter stayed out of their bloody way.
I don’t think that’s necessarily true.
No one was calling for Rypstra to come in last year when we desperately needed a small forward. No one’s asking for Walker to come in.
People are excited about Sellwood because he genuinely shows AFL traits and has been performing in the VFL.
He plays a position that has been constantly changing for us in the AFL and it’s not unrealistic to think he could be better than other options.
Yes it's certainly a generalisation.No one is calling for a Walker inclusion. . . Yet.
Not really needed,
In theory Lobb will play on and ruck against Riccardi then they both go to the bench same time match ups stay the same