Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Yes found that very suss at first but have since learnt that they are security guys that have been working with Kirk for a long time, security teams do use hand signals when working. So while it's possible I don't think it's probable that they were involved, but you never know.
The FBI asking us to believe he disassembled the gun, jumped off the roof and reassembled it in the woods to dispose of it without the screwdriver for the job (he left it on the roof) is a little harder to swallow.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Fair critique, but who would want to be a named source in times like this? Its ****ing madness right now.
All different sorts of independent forensic experts, including snipers are all adamant he was shot in the back of the head and the bullet exited from the neck. We're talking even experts in gun wounds and head trauma. Apparently you can even see in the video the entry point of the bullet. There's even a video of a guy in a position miliary snipers are saying are consistent with where the entry point was and the exit point. His body movements also apparently consistent with entry point from back of head. There's also experts saying the sound of the gun shot and it's time to impact consistent with the shooter being in that position and not the two hundred metres were told.
Not with a dummy shot for cover and a silencer on the kill weapon, which is all pretty much academic when you look at the physics, we can argue the details but it won't change what is explained in that video by an actual marine, and between him you and me there's only one professional and 2 other guys that happen to be chatting on the internet
There's another guy done the physics of where the FBI say the shot come from. It's quite a detailed assesment of where Kirk was and the shooter. The tent had a banner about 6 foot high, at the front of it. Shooter wouldn't of been able to see Kirk, would of been shooting blind.
www.abc.net.au
You notice it's not including the tent Kirk was under and the banner at front? Banner was about 6 foot high. Shooter was 55 feet up. Kirk was elevated on a little stage under tent bottom of a 8-10 slope. The physics simply don't lie here. The security dood standing up next to him, clearly shows height of banner, multiple vids from ground level also confirm height of banner and kirk
This is all well and good and it makes sense. But like James Lee said in the video I posted this morning, why dont they show Tyler Robinson taking the shot and/or getting up from laying down? This all is very Epstein as in we will show you bits of the video but not all of it. The only video footage we have seen is from a distance where we cant even make out the person, if he took the shot or even if he had a gun.A 3D rendering of the campus, taken from Google Earth, shows that the location of the building has a clear line of sight to the location of Charlie Kirk.
What videos from the scene tell us about Charlie Kirk's shooting
Verified videos taken at the scene of the shooting of high-profile right-wing activist Charlie Kirk show what appears to be a figure on the roof of a nearby building.
I enjoyed the Trump show, I reckon that kid was told the same thing Tylker was told, just shoot near the president and we'll take care of you later with a presidential pardon and you'll be helping big daddy, but lke all maga he couldn't hit the side of a barn (that's why you need a sniper or two) and he hit the podium and a bit of shrapnel nicked Trump's ear
