- Aug 3, 2020
- 27,658
- 48,844
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Boston Celtics, Liverpool
He might want to go there to join their star recruit of last year, Dan HoustoncArLtOn HaVe ShOwN iNtErEsT
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
He might want to go there to join their star recruit of last year, Dan HoustoncArLtOn HaVe ShOwN iNtErEsT
500k is now the average player wage. We can afford to go slightly higher for Jamie.I'm aware, I'm ecstatic he signed. Just thought we were going up to a base of $500k is all. Management has done well
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I wouldn't have thought so at his age. Was probably happy to sign for 2 years, just wanted the money to be better.Would there be a trigger for a 3rd year
And knowing how contracts like these can/are structured (not AFL ones in particular) while $650k is a nice whole figure, there could be any number of incentives, triggers etc that he needs to meet to even get there.are people not seeing the ridiculous money being thrown at relative spuds of the competition? The money atm is crazy and clubs are upping contracts to keep players.
Would you really want to lose Elliot for 100k diff a season?
650 is chump change for a player crucial to any finals success we have. He knocked back 3 years for 2 with us also.
You would think so.Would there be a trigger for a 3rd year
We paid $600-650k for a 25-30 goal forward just recently and it didn’t bother too manyThink of it this way, if there was a free agent forward out there that is coming off a 60 goal season (8 in finals), would you be happy to pay $650k to get him?
I’d assume yes. Even if his output drops slightly, I’d still pay that much for a 40 goal season forward.
Did TD write the article?Dynamic small forward Jamie Elliott has resisted a strong push to move north and has-re-signed to remain at Collingwood.
The unrestricted free agent has recommitted to Collingwood for at least two more years on at least $650,000 a year.
![]()
Jamie Elliott resists rival interest to re-sign with Collingwood
The dynamic small forward received a tempting offer from a Queensland-based club, but will instead play out his career in the black and white.www.theage.com.au
That’s….. somewhat terrifying
Josh aside he was the only one who showed up to the Prelim. And if the wheels hadn’t fallen off our club for a few weeks this season he would have been AA. Would have been disastrous for him to go.The contract isn’t for 2025…
Agreed Pragmatic Shill we’ve supposedly upped our offer by more than 30% which is big! I guess it’s probably as good a sign as any that we’ve abandoned retaining Mihocek…
Dynamic small forward Jamie Elliott has resisted a strong push to move north and has-re-signed to remain at Collingwood.
The unrestricted free agent has recommitted to Collingwood for at least two more years on at least $650,000 a year.
![]()
Jamie Elliott resists rival interest to re-sign with Collingwood
The dynamic small forward received a tempting offer from a Queensland-based club, but will instead play out his career in the black and white.www.theage.com.au
Dynamic small forward Jamie Elliott has resisted a strong push to move north and has-re-signed to remain at Collingwood.
The unrestricted free agent has recommitted to Collingwood for at least two more years on at least $650,000 a year.
![]()
Jamie Elliott resists rival interest to re-sign with Collingwood
The dynamic small forward received a tempting offer from a Queensland-based club, but will instead play out his career in the black and white.www.theage.com.au
Best photo I’ve seen since 2023.
Woah, woah, woah, comparing Carlton to North Korea is a step too far.Carlton is like North Korea
We made the Prelim this year.Its amusing that we're all (me included) so thrilled and relieved to not LOSE a player, even though it doesn't actually make us any better next year than we were this year. We'll all likely feel similar relief if/when its confirmed that Bobby Hill isn't leaving.
I wonder what (if anything) we might ultimately announce that genuinely improves us in 2026? So far it seems that we're not very interested in anyone and nobody's especially interested in coming to us either.
Dare we hope for news of a big surprise recruit, or are we going to be minor players in this trade/draft period?
It's already confirmed. Hill has left a multitude of comments online and the club has denied any willingness to let him go. Do you expect the club to make a "The rumors aren't true!" post, akin to when players sign new contracts? It's not going to happen, we have confirmation already. He's staying.We'll all likely feel similar relief if/when its confirmed that Bobby Hill isn't leaving.
More likely the starting offer of circa $480K base plus incentives is now $550K base plus incentives but like the media all do when reporting the final figure they go for maximum bang by including all possible incentives.The contract isn’t for 2025…
Agreed Pragmatic Shill we’ve supposedly upped our offer by more than 30% which is big! I guess it’s probably as good a sign as any that we’ve abandoned retaining Mihocek…
The phrasing was more “we’re not going to stand still”, with an allusion to a more balanced approach to drafting and senior player pursuitI agree that its a good news story and a big relief. I never said otherwise.
My recollection might be a bit wonky but I thought Fly said post-Prelim that he expected us to be very active trade/draft participants this off-season. Little evidence of that so far but perhaps we'll come with a rush near the end?
I remember it bothering a fair few but most seem to have got over it.We paid $600-650k for a 25-30 goal forward just recently and it didn’t bother too many