Remove this Banner Ad

Hot Topic CARLTON SUPPORTERS ONLY - Carlton fires Captain Carlton

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.


This thread is for the discussion of the sacking of a club mascot after refusing to participate in a bar mitzvah which was allegedly sending money back to the IDF.

By taking this position and labelling the act racist, the club has taken a position on the Israel-Palestine conflict.

This thread concerns a discussion of the following:
  • whether it is acceptable for the club to fire someone for taking a political stance.
  • whether it is a good idea for the club to have taken a public position on this issue.

This thread is not a thread in which you should partake in expressing your political beliefs concerning the conflict, nor is it somewhere in which forum rules do not apply.

Should you seek to participate in conversation related to the war, you can do so here:

There's also a thread on the SRP for a more robust discussion than can be permitted here:


If you wish to participate in this thread, do so knowing that this will not be allowed to escalate beyond a point.

Thanks all!
 
Last edited:
That's a great question. It would be alarming to say the least if the club knew about the IDF fundraising part of the event.

I would love to know more about this situation, but sadly I don't think we'll get anything more than what we've already been given.
I would say he was only contracted to show up for the Bar Mitzvah, and found out that the parents were using the event to fundraise for the wounded IDF soldiers when he got there. They probably asked him to chip in to the fund. And that was probably when he arc'd up.
 
I read the word 'overheard', not the word 'shouted'.

Who really knows without being there... this article doesn't really say:


Whether he shouted it or not, it was still an inappropriate thing to say.

The club should not be putting anybody into a situation that requires a moral quandry.

He should have handled himself better. Finish the event and quit. Or if he couldn't bear to be there... he could still have left, why say what he did?

So like I said, giving him a free pass here has so many detrimental implications... even potentially through to the playing group... I'm sure there are players that do not appreciate such remarks... no way he was keeping his job. The club did the right thing.

This was a private event where a personal request was made. Someone at the club used their influence to smooze up to some bigwig, by using the club mascot. It wasn't a club sanctioned event.

The intentions of some bigwig at the club are irrelevant. If he didn't learn of where the money was going, no one would have a problem with this private event... because it's irrelevant...

Bottom line is, he was still representing the club, and from what I gather, his bosses were there? No way that behaviour was going to go unpunished...
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Who really knows without being there... this article doesn't really say:


Whether he shouted it or not, it was still an inappropriate thing to say.



He should have handled himself better. Finish the event and quit. Or if he couldn't bear to be there... he could still have left, why say what he did?

So like I said, giving him a free pass here has so many detrimental implications... even potentially through to the playing group... I'm sure there are players that do not appreciate such remarks... no way he was keeping his job. The club did the right thing.



The intentions of some bigwig at the club are irrelevant. If he didn't learn of where the money was going, no one would have a problem with this private event... because it's irrelevant...

Bottom line is, he was still representing the club, and from what I gather, his bosses were there? No way that behaviour was going to go unpunished...

Could have simply been a case of telling someone from the club he wasn't doing it and why. Gets overheard by a bystander a d that's that.

Which word was the sackable offense ... ****ing or zios?
 
We don't know what the terms of his contract with the club are, so this is an assumption.
The problem there is that the comments attributed to him are about political ideology and the followers. The fact that he showed up to the Bar Mitzvah says that he isn't antisemitic.
 
I’m making the assumption that clubs are smart enough to ask for details of events they are committing staff for.
I highly doubt that the club asked, or knew anything outside of it being a bar mitzvah for a kid.
Insinuating otherwise is a giant leap.
 
Could have simply been a case of telling someone from the club he wasn't doing it and why. Gets overheard by a bystander a d that's that.

Which word was the sackable offense ... ****ing or zios?

Could be, but that's not what was reported... we simply don't know enough to say for sure.

As for the word, I believe it's not just a word... it's the remark. It is hostile toward a political movement and the club must be seen to be neutral in such political views to avoid backlash from either side. Had he made remarks in such a manner but for an opposing view, I'd imagine the club would take the same stance as it is absolutely the right thing to do from their perspective.

Trust me on this one, it is all about protecting the brand... club can't be seen as "supportive" of a divisive political battle... especially one as sensitive as this... way too many detrimental implications.
 
I highly doubt that the club asked, or knew anything outside of it being a bar mitzvah for a kid.
Insinuating otherwise is a giant leap.

That's the issue - checks and procedures aren't just a make-work program for pedantic nerds, they're in place to prevent exactly this type of situation
 
Who really knows without being there... this article doesn't really say:


Whether he shouted it or not, it was still an inappropriate thing to say.



He should have handled himself better. Finish the event and quit. Or if he couldn't bear to be there... he could still have left, why say what he did?

So like I said, giving him a free pass here has so many detrimental implications... even potentially through to the playing group... I'm sure there are players that do not appreciate such remarks... no way he was keeping his job. The club did the right thing.



The intentions of some bigwig at the club are irrelevant. If he didn't learn of where the money was going, no one would have a problem with this private event... because it's irrelevant...

Bottom line is, he was still representing the club, and from what I gather, his bosses were there? No way that behaviour was going to go unpunished...
If it was an official club action, he would have been there with a rep from the club. So that brings the whole "overheard" argument into play. The only way it would have been overheard is if he made the comment in a very public area. Stupid really. He should have pulled the rep aside where they were private. Told them they weren't staying and left it up to the rep to make excuses while CC buggered off. It wouldn't matter what CC told the rep as that was a private conversation.
 
If he was talked into it without this being brought up, he's got every right to be upset, but the alleged comments aren't on.

Supporting injured IDF soldiers isn't the worst charity in the world however, but I would like to know more about the people and charity involved before standing behind that call.

I'm certainly not a fan of the IDF's actions of late, but that is distinct from soldiers who serve their country, particularly for a somewhat conscripted military.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

How about we get someone that has no political stance on anything
groot GIF
 
I would say he was only contracted to show up for the Bar Mitzvah, and found out that the parents were using the event to fundraise for the wounded IDF soldiers when he got there. They probably asked him to chip in to the fund. And that was probably when he arc'd up.

Probably asked him to chip in.

Have you taken up the Octo Bass? 😉
 
Who really knows without being there... this article doesn't really say:


Whether he shouted it or not, it was still an inappropriate thing to say.



He should have handled himself better. Finish the event and quit. Or if he couldn't bear to be there... he could still have left, why say what he did?

So like I said, giving him a free pass here has so many detrimental implications... even potentially through to the playing group... I'm sure there are players that do not appreciate such remarks... no way he was keeping his job. The club did the right thing.



The intentions of some bigwig at the club are irrelevant. If he didn't learn of where the money was going, no one would have a problem with this private event... because it's irrelevant...

Bottom line is, he was still representing the club, and from what I gather, his bosses were there? No way that behaviour was going to go unpunished...
Ch7 is very unreliable when it comes to this sort of thing. Any chance to stoke fear, hatred and controversy and they're all over it. I'm not taking anything said here as factual.
 
Probably asked him to chip in.

Have you taken up the Octo Bass? 😉
The Octobasse? nope... but I seriously wouldn't mind doing some bass fishing one day.

Crap, and now I have an ADHD driven migrane starting.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If it was an official club action, he would have been there with a rep from the club. So that brings the whole "overheard" argument into play. The only way it would have been overheard is if he made the comment in a very public area. Stupid really. He should have pulled the rep aside where they were private. Told them they weren't staying and left it up to the rep to make excuses while CC buggered off. It wouldn't matter what CC told the rep as that was a private conversation.
And it's an incredible coincidence that it was 'overheard', and somehow the details made it's way to the media by use of magic.

Someone who may be a little more cyncial may suggest that certain pissed off Board Members who attended the gig conveniently leaked it to the media to justify the sacking.

Anyway, I've said enough about our 'club's' handling of this. And the best part is that we only have to wait for another day or two until their next sacking.

We love sackings down at Princes Park.
 
Ch7 is very unreliable when it comes to this sort of thing. Any chance to stoke fear, hatred and controversy and they're all over it. I'm not taking anything said here as factual.
It doesn't matter if you're wrong, so long as you're first.

The mantra of modern journalism.
 
And it's an incredible coincidence that it was 'overheard', and somehow the details made it's way to the media by use of magic.

Someone who may be a little more cyncial may suggest that certain pissed off Board Members who attended the gig conveniently leaked it to the media to justify the sacking.

Anyway, I've said enough about our 'club's' handling of this. And the best part is that we only have to wait for another day or two until their next sacking.

We love sackings down at Princes Park.
Yup... we get plenty of exercise jumping to conclusions and having knee jerk reactions.
 
Let's face it, the club have always catered to one side of the political spectrum more than the other. Our history is shrouded in it. Menzies, Fraser, Elliott, Frydenburg. The rich and the powerful have radiated to this club, like no other. With that comes networking, corporate sponsorships and the club not wanting to bite the hand that feeds it.

We've balanced that out with our support for pride round in the AFLW and the Carlton Respects round, which are largely considered left leaning causes, though I'd argue they are just human causes, and should not be considered political at all.

It's tough to get on to our board, and you’ve got a better chance if you are cashed up and corporate. The personal beliefs of our board are not always going to reflect the supporter base as a whole.

I believe Carlton should not have a political affiliation at all. It should be community affiliations, and a close eye on which sponsors we engage with. We should not be any rich person's/movement's/corporation's plaything.

Everybody from the club that was at this event was representing Carlton, and arranged for this employee to appear on their behalf. His failure was also their failure as far as due diligence and the position we have painted ourselves into.
What the heck has someone being asked to appear at a kids birthday party got to do with politics. The guy I’m sure likes the extra off season cash. Never heard complaints when it came to taking Pratts money and others who have given generously.

You’re a mod for crying out loud, and this thread was not supposed to be political, but of course Jews and money and power sneaks its way in.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Hot Topic CARLTON SUPPORTERS ONLY - Carlton fires Captain Carlton

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top