- Dec 8, 2003
- 6,962
- 12,025
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Really? I’d rather Chloe BownNews around that we are looking to move up the draft to make certain we get Chloe Brown.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Really? I’d rather Chloe BownNews around that we are looking to move up the draft to make certain we get Chloe Brown.
To be fair it is pronounced Brown. spelt with a silent R. She probably lives in Prahran!Really? I’d rather Chloe Bown
Haven't been around here as much lately. Out of touch.To be fair it is pronounced Brown. spelt with a silent R. She probably lives in Prahran!
Nothing's certain but mad if we didn't try.News around that we are looking to move up the draft to make certain we get Chloe Brown.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yeah they will most likely do this to spilt 1 pick into 2 picks.Haven't been around here as much lately. Out of touch.
I'm surprised GC have said their #1 is up for grabs. Do they need to offload #1 to secure academy picks?
Wt absolute fGood old CFL…I see they’ve given the Giants another pick in the first round, just before us.
GWS 5 wins in 3 years and have been shite for years. The bigger problem is the amount of high end AFLW talent that's at the top, so that Melbourne lose Eden Zanker, one of their 3 gun forwards, and get a pick to bundle it with their first so that they can move up to get pick 1 from Suns and draft the best midfielder in the open draft, which is a big chance of happening.
GWS History.GWS 5 wins in 3 years and have been shite for years. The bigger problem is the amount of high end AFLW talent that's at the top, so that Melbourne lose Eden Zanker, one of their 3 gun forwards, and get a pick to bundle it with their first so that they can move up to get pick 1 from Suns and draft the best midfielder in the open draft, which is a big chance of happening.
We would've needed to be crap for longer to get what GWS got.
Pick 3 - 4, Don't think we can stuff this up even with moving back one place. There are 4 players in the open draft that I would rate in the top 10 alongside the off limits Suns academy 4-5 players. We will get one of them. I doubt GWS will take 2 x mids as they have Parker coming back from a year off with a broken foot, so that leaves us either a top mid or the next best which I like, a gun defender.
We need to get better at drafting talent in 2nd round and late rounds IMO. The other clubs have found hidden gems while we seem to seek out the coal on the green.
Yep, will take some special negotiating to get around that.GWS 5 wins in 3 years and have been shite for years. The bigger problem is the amount of high end AFLW talent that's at the top, so that Melbourne lose Eden Zanker, one of their 3 gun forwards, and get a pick to bundle it with their first so that they can move up to get pick 1 from Suns and draft the best midfielder in the open draft, which is a big chance of happening.
Especially with Grace Egan encouraged to seek her options, who, rightly or wrongly, is a lock in the mids each week. So we need to get better AND replace her. Sounds like we need two mids to me.GWS History.
2017 - 8 teams - finished 8th (no finals - 2 made GF)
2018 - 8 teams - finished 4th (no finals - 2 made GF)
2019 - Conference B - 5 teams - finished 3th (2 made PF)
2020 - Conference A - 7 teams - finished 2nd (top 4 made finals - bundled out first final v Melb)
2021 - 14 teams - finished 9th (top 6 made finals)
2022 S6 - 14 teams - finished 9th (top 6 made finals)
2022 S7 - 18 teams - finished 11th (top 8 made finals)
2023 - 18 teams - finished 16th (top 8 made finals)
2024 - 18 teams - finished 16th (top 8 made finals)
2025 - 18 teams - finished 17th (top 8 made finals)
Not happy that Richmond's pick slides but if you are going to give assistance then the above definitely qualifies. I reckon trying to get a decent GWS team up is probably the hardest gig in women's footy.
Personally I would be disappointed if we picked a defender over a mid at pick 4. Week after week we get smashed in the middle and I think this is our greatest need.
A defender some rated above Zippy Fish, not our greatest need but Evie Cowcher is too good a footballer to pass on here. In IMO only. Still a chance either Tayla McMillan or Mia Russo could get to pick 4.Personally I would be disappointed if we picked a defender over a mid at pick 4. Week after week we get smashed in the middle and I think this is our greatest need.
A defender some rated above Zippy Fish, not our greatest need but Evie Cowcher is too good a footballer to pass on here. In IMO only. Still a chance either Tayla McMillan or Mia Russo could get to pick 4.
Two premierships in a row - transfer earliest pick to last pick. It would make trading for this sort of deal harder, probably forcing the Premier to then to use their 1st round pick in the previous year, so a 2nd rounder goes to the back of the pack, making it harder still .Bit concerning that back stress franctures meant that Cowcher played very little footy in 2025 though. That might see her slide.
Sounds like the side that just won its 27th game in a row will steal then 2023 # 1 pick from the bulldogs. AFL can throw assistance picks around but how about fixing that!
I'd pick either McMillan or Russo as first preference this year, if either still there, and next year draft Bailee Martin a KPF.Sounds like the side that just won its 27th game in a row will steal then 2023 # 1 pick from the bulldogs. AFL can throw assistance picks around but how about fixing that!
Some players won't budge with offers under the current system, with this tier structure the difference between 2nd and 3rd tier is only 13k difference and is only 22k between tier 2 and tier 4.Two premierships in a row - transfer earliest pick to last pick. It would make trading for this sort of deal harder, probably forcing the Premier to then to use their 1st round pick in the previous year, so a 2nd rounder goes to the back of the pack, making it harder still .
Interesting. There is money, and/or security, and/or success.I'd pick either McMillan or Russo as first preference this year, if either still there, and next year draft Bailee Martin a KPF.
Some players won't budge with offers under the current system, with this tier structure the difference between 2nd and 3rd tier is only 13k difference and is only 22k between tier 2 and tier 4.
The 3 foundation clubs (Melb, Lions, Crows) and North are the player rich clubs, also well run clubs and kudos for going there early to them, but because of this that also makes it easier if they do lose players to rejuvenate well, as they have shown.
The AFLW should give the clubs that have not won a final to get a financial leg up in the form of extra cap $$ for say a 3 yr contract term, maybe even front end it, to enable clubs like us to extract some of these players and correct the trend which is going the other way.
If we were to chase Blathin Bougue to leave North, as someone who kicked 25 goals in one season, how do you do this to shift the needle for just offering her 13k? If we had the license to triple that amount to $40k per year more than what she currently gets by means of extra $$ in cap and on a long term contract, now you do shift the needle. Make it 1 player per club who've never won a final and then you'd see 3 to 4 stripped from each of these clubs.
I'd take two of the 3, all 3 all the better - if a player can see signs that success is coming, especially at a club like ours known for recent successes, great.Interesting. There is money, and/or security, and/or success.
Home / family, and there is also after-football career considerations.
The other driver is game-opportunity, for players like Bougue, offered at the right time.
Finding that right mix of motivators.
We had about 26 of 33 up for contract as season's end. TigermanM2 seemed to think that all Clubs had a similar ratio. I do wonder. Reading the article "Who's going where" - seems other Clubs might have a higher ratio of contacted players than we do - maybe?
