Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Werewolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is PART 4

Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.

The Assassination of Charlie Kirk

Take Note

Anti-trans commentary and nastiness will be deleted and warnings issued.
 
No the conspiracy would be (to give only 2 examples) the complete absence of full details from the 2008 case which saw Epstein have 16 federal counts reduced to 2 state ones in the mother of all sweetheart deals facilitated by a bloke █████ then appointed to his cabinet in his first term, and the victim statements to law enforcement which the victims want released. The lack of these items means that the █████ admin is defying law (again) as laid out in the Epstein Files Transparency Act passed last month.

But you know all that.
So the grand jury transcripts can be released?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I wouldn't be surprised if the regime have deliberately chucked in some obviously fake stuff to poison the well
 
Have been

Redacted to protect witnesses and victims. But other documents that have been redacted and which government officials were specifically NOT supposed to be redacted, it's been shown references to Trump are heavily redacted.

So, do you trust it?
 
Definitely fake. Ignoring how horribly it is written, the content is just a bit too convenient.

"Hello fellow pedo! I just wanted to reconnect over out shared interest in pedophilia. And █████ is the best pedo ever! BTW I'm going to top myself, you take care now."
Your ignoring the fact that these people were the masters of the universe. This had been happening for years. Why would they have seen a need to be coy?
 
The Justice Department said on Wednesday that it had discovered over a million more pages of material related to the investigation of the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — doubling the amount previously known and lengthening the time it will take to release the material.


Need time to look for Voldemort name
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The Justice Department said on Wednesday that it had discovered over a million more pages of material related to the investigation of the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — doubling the amount previously known and lengthening the time it will take to release the material.


Need time to look for Voldemort name
They "found" it after stating they had about a smaller amount, and then having it pointed out to them that the documents they already released contained documents that said there was a million Epstein documents.
 
Its actually too well written if anything, if you've seen some of Jeff's emails that came out a month or so back.
It's getting more interesting.

It was post marked Virginia, but apparently there is a postal clearing house in Virginia a lot of prison mail goes through, so that's consistent.

It's also post marked after Epstein's death, but prisoner mail can take a couple of weeks to process, so him sending it, then dying several days later, and it not getting post marked until.after that is also not inconsistent.

It also appears to have originated in the prison Epstein was in.

The files also contain reference to it being sent for forensic handwriting analysis, but the results of that are not included.

The DOJ have said it was investigated but concluded to be fake on the basis of the date and the Virginia post stamp.

So. First, if it's fake, why was it released? Have they deliberately included fake documents to discredit other documents? "This letter is fake, so we think these documents referencing Trump are fake too".

And if it's fake, why not show the handwriting analysis? Why rely on the date and Virginia processing which aren't conclusive?
 
It's getting more interesting.

It was post marked Virginia, but apparently there is a postal clearing house in Virginia a lot of prison mail goes through, so that's consistent.

It's also post marked after Epstein's death, but prisoner mail can take a couple of weeks to process, so him sending it, then dying several days later, and it not getting post marked until.after that is also not inconsistent.

It also appears to have originated in the prison Epstein was in.

The files also contain reference to it being sent for forensic handwriting analysis, but the results of that are not included.

The DOJ have said it was investigated but concluded to be fake on the basis of the date and the Virginia post stamp.

So. First, if it's fake, why was it released? Have they deliberately included fake documents to discredit other documents? "This letter is fake, so we think these documents referencing █████ are fake too".

And if it's fake, why not show the handwriting analysis? Why rely on the date and Virginia processing which aren't conclusive?
It's even more interesting.

A lot of this info from the DOJ comes via twitter, but apparently the White House has now taken over the DOJ Twitter account.

So we are seeing journalists asking questions of the DOJ via Twitter getting fobbed of or insulted.
 
It's getting more interesting.

It was post marked Virginia, but apparently there is a postal clearing house in Virginia a lot of prison mail goes through, so that's consistent.

It's also post marked after Epstein's death, but prisoner mail can take a couple of weeks to process, so him sending it, then dying several days later, and it not getting post marked until.after that is also not inconsistent.

It also appears to have originated in the prison Epstein was in.

The files also contain reference to it being sent for forensic handwriting analysis, but the results of that are not included.

The DOJ have said it was investigated but concluded to be fake on the basis of the date and the Virginia post stamp.

So. First, if it's fake, why was it released? Have they deliberately included fake documents to discredit other documents? "This letter is fake, so we think these documents referencing █████ are fake too".

And if it's fake, why not show the handwriting analysis? Why rely on the date and Virginia processing which aren't conclusive?
I don’t believe for a moment that it’s fake. If it was, the FBI wouldn’t have kept it and filed it — surely they’re not in the business of collecting fake documents to muddy the waters in their investigations.
Classic lie from the liar’s White House.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The DOJ have said it was investigated but concluded to be fake on the basis of the date and the Virginia post stamp.

So. First, if it's fake, why was it released? Have they deliberately included fake documents to discredit other documents? "This letter is fake, so we think these documents referencing █████ are fake too".

And if it's fake, why not show the handwriting analysis? Why rely on the date and Virginia processing which aren't conclusive?

Maybe because the Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R.4405) compels them to release all unclassified documents, records, and communications related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein.
 
Last edited:
Ratings lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom