Darkyprotector
Premiership Player
- Apr 10, 2017
- 4,871
- 2,379
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Lawyer praises 'heroic, courageous' Hird for accepting 12-month ban
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-08-28/lawyer-praises-heroic-courageous-hird
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lawyer praises 'heroic, courageous' Hird for accepting 12-month ban
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-08-28/lawyer-praises-heroic-courageous-hird
That would be VLAD under cross examination.
"You want me on that wall you NEED me on that wall"
I struggle to understand how any penalties can be handed down against Vlad, Gil and Fitzy if they are found to have engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct. It's a provision of consumer law and as far as I understand the person bringing the action must prove that they have suffered loss or damage. Not sure that Burnside's client will be able to show that.
Looks like an exercise in muck raking rather than a case that will see sanctions handed down.
Dummy's guide to misleading and deceptive conduct.
https://legalvision.com.au/a-basic-...e-misrepresentations-australian-consumer-law/
Joking aside...A quick check of this guy gives the impression of 'trying to make a name for himself' much more than 'distinguished legal mind', so yeah, could easily be doing it more for the attention and a share of any winnings.
I doubt the AFLs lawyers are quaking in their books.
Jackson Taylor/Julian Burnside/Gillon/Fitzpatrick Court case from yesterday.
Starting to think that Taylor is a front for someone.....
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl...ssendon-supplements-saga-20180321-p4z5jc.html
Several things point to the AFL having knowledge of what was going on, up to a year before it became public. Let it be heard!I continually read how the AFL is corrupt, so would expect a groundswell of support on BF for this action.
I wonder if Taylor will be granted a full trial because it appears, he is not arguing he has been directly affected under the terms of the claim - On the other hand, I continually read how the AFL is corrupt, so would expect a groundswell of support on BF for this action.
Lets hope that the truth finally come's out so we can bury this matter for good, but something tells me that the AFL don't want the whole truth to come out and will duck and dive where ever they can.THE Essendon drugs saga returns to the Supreme Court at 9.30am tomorrow where Justice John Dixon will rule on the AFL’s bid to avert a full blown trial over its handling of the six-season scandal.
Human rights lawyer Julian Burnside, QC, is leading a case brought against the league and top brass Gillon McLachlan and Mike Fitzpatrick alleging misleading and deceptive conduct.
Lawyers for the AFL have sought a limited trial on preliminary issues restricting the need for witnesses or the discovery of documents, but if that application is dismissed, McLachlan, Fitzpatrick, former AFL boss Andrew Demetriou and former AFL integrity unit manager Brett Clothier face the prospect of being called to give evidence.
For me that's an admission of guilt. Something to hideIm tipping a lot of witnesses will have bad memories and cant remember. Lots of those in a few recent royal commissions.
= If i tell the truth it will expose the past lies." I cannot recall "
" I cannot recall "
Well said...The issue here is, and has always been, that most non Ess BF supporters think the AFL were corrupt in this case, in that they did everything they could to protect Essendon during this saga and get the players off, even to the point of branding the whole thing a supplements saga. So hence no such support from BF about Essendons constant sooking about the big bad AFL being out to get them. Surely this isnt new news.
VINDICATION IS COMING