Round 1 VC/C

[LittleMLO]

Gruncrae

MacRundy has a better ring to it imo

 

[Seymour Skinner]

VC Danger.

C Macrae.

Lots of options but Danger is a no brainer to VC on the G against the Pies who rarely tag.

Cogs also another smoky and he could destroy the Bombers on his own up there in NSW and his JLT form was great. Pity GWS play so late in the round.

Bigger question is what score do you take for the VC loophole? use to be around 120-30 but with the way a few blokes are pumping out massive scores as evident last season i reckon 140 is the minimum or close to it.

Don't think Grundy rucking against whatever garbage truck ruckmen Geelong roll out with is a better option in the same game?

Can't knock back a 120 odd, unless your team is firing with every premo pick + fielding the rights rookies and you think your a shot at the weekly.

 

[Kadog]

VC Danger.

C Macrae.

Lots of options but Danger is a no brainer to VC on the G against the Pies who rarely tag.

Cogs also another smoky and he could destroy the Bombers on his own up there in NSW and his JLT form was great. Pity GWS play so late in the round.

Bigger question is what score do you take for the VC loophole? use to be around 120-30 but with the way a few blokes are pumping out massive scores as evident last season i reckon 140 is the minimum or close to it.

That’s way too high. I’ll be banking 125+

 

[Hava Alle]

VC Danger.

C Macrae.

Lots of options but Danger is a no brainer to VC on the G against the Pies who rarely tag.

Cogs also another smoky and he could destroy the Bombers on his own up there in NSW and his JLT form was great. Pity GWS play so late in the round.

Bigger question is what score do you take for the VC loophole? use to be around 120-30 but with the way a few blokes are pumping out massive scores as evident last season i reckon 140 is the minimum or close to it.

Greenwood tags Selwood every opportunity, could he go to Danger for a change? Then Geelong would just throw him forward and he will kick 8. What am I even asking?

 

[JRyan23]

VC on Cripps or Grundy???

 

[Wesley2]

VC Grundy
C Fyfe

 

[Caztheconquerer]

Thinking Cripps vc into Gawn or Grundy, I have Macrae but didn’t Hewitt do a good job on him last year

 

[Daniel McL]

VC - Tom J Lynch
C - Danger

 

[Watts4Dinner]

Danger / Gawn
Grundy / Gawn

Tough choice.

 

[toxic]

VC on Cripps or Grundy???

Cripps

 

[Watts4Dinner]

Cripps

Hey Babe.

 

[Flandersss]

VC Tom J Lynch

 

[BuddysBuddy23]

Cripps VC. The C won’t matter.

 

[Blackhawk42]

VC: Cripps.
C: Danger.

I passed on Dangers 117 last season to keep Fyfe as captain in the round he did his hammy. My official pass number for the loophole has been lowered to 115 to avoid that happening in the future.

 

[vast]

Im thinking Danger into Gawn if Ryder isnt named.

Otherwise Cripps into Danger.

 

[Obese Arachnid]

If you can VC Danger then you should VC Danger!

 

[Axly]

Gonna risk not taking Cripps 125.

Grundy or Danger or Macrae ? [emoji848]

 

[Test Tickle]

VC Grundy
C Macrae

 

[PoopingHindi]

Gonna risk not taking Cripps 125.

Grundy or Danger or Macrae ? [emoji848]

Danger.
i'd be worried about Macrae getting tagged and Grundy making a slow start off the back of that toe injury and a lackluster JLT.

seriously though, just bank the points.

 

[Me Myself and I]

Gonna risk not taking Cripps 125.

Grundy or Danger or Macrae ? [emoji848]

It's only round one, not worth taking the risk.

 

[Flandersss]

C Fyfe
VC Cripps

Taken Cripps 126

 

[Faz 2000]

Hmmmnnn, taken Cripps score. Kinda right on the line - certainly some players will beat it - but it's a pretty damn good score.

 

[balmainforever]

Will watch Grundy closely tonight before deciding on whether to take the Cripps 126.
With Nank getting 127 and Phillips 98, looks like good Rucks could go 150+ each week

 

[nameless]

Martin as VC no good.

Now the choice is Macrae / Grundy / Gawn / Danger

I'm leaning to Grundy considering he is up against a solo Stanley
Grundy not the best track record for Rd 1 though, and slight issues with fitness perhaps.

 

[vast]

Bines C