Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2006
- Posts
- 106,477
- Reaction score
- 279,832
- Location
- The local Satanist Cabal
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Adelaide v Carlton - Rd 5 - 7:10PM Thu
Squiggle tips Crows at 82% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 5 Games
Soccer Notice Image
FA Cup Semi-Finals ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ Europa - Rd of 16 ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - KNOCKOUTS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ Champs League - League Phase ⚽
, traded to Hawthorn for 4th round pick
. I mean, aside from not playing in forever, not being tackled properly for the same amount of time, having no idea what his sideways movement will be like and the mental damage of having a very very serious injury, then sure.. absolutely no reason.
VFL this week, maybe next if they want to build him into a full game (yes I know he's always very fit). Allow him to believe in his body again, then pull the trigger.
Running around Tom Scully making some news, traded to Hawthorn for 4th round pick
.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
North have read this & will also be naming Scully this weekendScully to be named and then a late out after it pulls in an extra 10k worth of fans through the gates lol
The only difference is the impact on the Senior Team, with regard to capped interchange.No different on his body playing seniors or VFL, in fact he will get a better surface at the G than at Werribee so again its a better situation for him to play AFL. He is playing so lets move on.
The only difference is the impact on the Senior Team, with regard to capped interchange.
If he is only to play 40%-50% game time, then he can do that at a BHH Praccy Match without impact. If he is only to play 50%-60% game time at Senior Level, then it means our other players have to spend longer on the field or burn the interchanges etc.
That’s the only thing I can see being a consideration. If it’s a managed return by %, then it should (IMO) be at BHH. If it’s a full return but may only see him playing 70%-80% game time (based on how he feels & how the game is going) then it should be in the 1sts.
I agree.He holds 4 out of the top 5 most kms covered in a game, his tank is probably the best we’ve ever seen in the game.. I think he comes in and play 70-80% as you say.
Dont forget Tom scully played a full scratch match after JLT 2.
The club arent stupid with this. If hes selected hes fit enough to play. Even at 70% of his output, hes at average afl fitness levels.
Get excited.
On SM-G950F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Running around Tom Scully making some news, traded to Hawthorn for 4th round pick
.
They haven’t been using gps very long so hard to make that kind of claim. Harvey clocked 19.6 in a game and I’m pretty sure that would still be the record. I also recall Crawford and Buckley were estimated to run near that kind of distance albeit using some sort of estimation method rather than a modern gps.He holds 4 out of the top 5 most kms covered in a game, his tank is probably the best we’ve ever seen in the game.. I think he comes in and play 70-80% as you say.

They haven’t been using gps very long so hard to make that kind of claim. Harvey clocked 19.6 in a game and I’m pretty sure that would still be the record. I also recall Crawford and Buckley were estimated to run near that kind of distance albeit using some sort of estimation method rather than a modern gps.![]()
Considering how poor estimation methods are, particularly back in 2000 when Harvey reportedly covered that distance, I'd back the official 18.3kms covered by Tom Scully to be the record. As great both Crawf and Harvey were, a modern athlete will almost always be superior to an athlete from an older and less professional AFL.
The only difference is the impact on the Senior Team, with regard to capped interchange.
If he is only to play 40%-50% game time, then he can do that at a BHH Praccy Match without impact. If he is only to play 50%-60% game time at Senior Level, then it means our other players have to spend longer on the field or burn the interchanges etc.
That’s the only thing I can see being a consideration. If it’s a managed return by %, then it should (IMO) be at BHH. If it’s a full return but may only see him playing 70%-80% game time (based on how he feels & how the game is going) then it should be in the 1sts.
Did you just dis crawf at the expense of Scully? Only on this thread pal, only on this thread.... ;-)
Im sure Crawf and Harvey covered more distance, close to 20km was regularly what was said.
but the HUGE difference is the speed of that distance travelled. Those guys were great runners, but Scully almost matches them and has the fitness to run at full pace for a lot of that.
Essendon paying 2x first round for Shiel is pretty amazing.
We paid 1 x first rounder (and a second and burton) for Wingard
We paid 1 x first rounder and 3 x second for O'Meara
We paid 1 x first rounder for Tom Mitchell
We paid 1 x 4th rounder for Tom Scully
We paid 1 x first rounder (and Mark Williams) for Burgoyne
We paid 1 x first rounder for Gunston
It's a huge price. Pick 9 and whatever their first pick is this year (6-9).
Crazy trade.
Dododo did a real crazy here.
I just can’t help but wonder how fit he will be. His game is primarily based on being able to outrun everybody else and he’s undoubtably lost some of that ability (for the meantime anyway) since he’s been sidelined.
Wouldn’t be suprised if it takes him a while to get that back.
Could play HFF as he seems to love a goal. I don’t think that would reduce the load all that much though, not like say playing FP wouldThe other way to manage load is by position. Nobody seems to be considering him in a position other than the wing where his load will be greatest. Could he hold down another position?
During his playing career Crawford was recognised as having potential to be an elite 800m runner. I wouldn’t dismiss his athletic ability. We just don’t have a means of comparison. Of the current players no doubt Scully is top of the tree (prior to injury).As a pure runner I’m not sure Crawf or Harvey had the tank Scully, a lot would have to do with sports science no doubt. As players there is little comparison, Crawf and Harvey stand out as 2 of the greatest mids to play the game.
During his playing career Crawford was recognised as having potential to be an elite 800m runner. I wouldn’t dismiss his athletic ability. We just don’t have a means of comparison. Of the current players no doubt Scully is top of the tree (prior to injury).