Coach said the other day, he is now fully fit.Best I've seen Steele play for a while too. Improving each week.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Coach said the other day, he is now fully fit.Best I've seen Steele play for a while too. Improving each week.



Being an older fart, I saw Stewart play a lot, and although Hunter has some very nice skills and played well today, Stewart would eat him for dinner- just aerobically a better player. I would still get Hunter to spend summer with a running coach.Mr H Clark is not appreciated nearly enough by Saints fans. All this crap talk about his lack of obvious muscle does not recognise his body shape or his skill. He's broad and strong, his timing and dual sided coordination is superb and he's fearless. That combination is very hard to play against, even though he isn't fast.
Some of us remember Ian Stewart win 3 Brownlow medals with a very similar body shape (ok, different era) and speed. He was a left footer whose ability to capture the ball in almost impossible situations and somehow get out (left sided advantage) was very hard to stop.
Years ago I had a number of conversations with a former Richmond premiership player in the Tommy Hafey era who played with Stewart after he went to them. He said that even at training when you were about the grab the ball Stewart's left had would appear by magic at the last second and then the ball was gone. He claimed his close contested ability to get the ball was untrainable and unstoppable.
That's how I view Hunter's style and ball control. He has been badly injured a few times, enough for most players to have retired. If he can get another half a dozen injury free games he'll improve even more and no-one will question how critical he is for our success.
The one where there was 4 or so minutes on the clock?How about the Dees guy putting the ball on the ground instead of handing to our player ( forget who) Should have been an immediate 50. Saw the same in the Giants game I think it was. 50 paid.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Fascinating way we used Clark today. Attended just one centre bounce and think he lined up forward all day, pushing up to the stoppages. Had 20 and a goal and could so easily have been two.
Hill had a sneaky good game, with
26 disposals
13 marks
6 score involvements
678m-gained
120 fantasy points (2nd-most).
Albeit with
0 contested possessions
0 tackles
0 inside 50’s!![]()
Very very good today and good to give him shoutouts when he plays well because he has been copping it after each loss. Set up a lot of our play today alongside Nas.Hill looked very good I thought. I noticed he seemed to be getting a lot of touches in our back half. His skills looked tidy and his running was as good as it always is. Not sure if he was playing wing or as part of the defensive line. Hill isn't going to all of a sudden develop a contested game. He's always been a runner. If he's not making critical errors he's a valuable player still.
Yep, I think he’d love to take that huge ground everywhere with him. So would we as a team probably. Wilson would have loved it.Hill looked very good I thought. I noticed he seemed to be getting a lot of touches in our back half. His skills looked tidy and his running was as good as it always is. Not sure if he was playing wing or as part of the defensive line. Hill isn't going to all of a sudden develop a contested game. He's always been a runner. If he's not making critical errors he's a valuable player still.
I don't care if he gets a contested possession, he needs to stop the turnovers, however the longer he went the better he got. The goal in the 3rd was clutch.
I suppose the NAZ and Hill turnovers look worse as they are the playmakers, but shit they open the field when they hit the mark.
Nas & Wilk then daylight.Bye BnF
1. Higgins
2. NWM
3. Wilkie
4. Sinclair
5. McRae
The rest i have no clue about
U sure about
I think SnagsNas & Wilk then daylight.
I reckon RTB poured a bit of cold water on it in his presser. His language was actually quite similar to what he used with Battle. Still, fingers crossed, would be an amazing moment for the club if he signed on.Surely we announce NAS re-signing over the bye
Box was tough today and did some nice things with some real good disposals. Looks a player to me.Just landed in Dubai and saw we had a win. (Typical when I leave the country!)
Can someone tell me how my boy Boxshall went?
Wilkie and Butler seem to have had a day out and 3 goals to Keeler.
Mini summary would be appreciated
Yea didn’t sound too great to me tbhI reckon RTB poured a bit of cold water on it in his presser. His language was actually quite similar to what he used with Battle. Still, fingers crossed, would be an amazing moment for the club if he signed on.
Shieeeit I’ll have to suss, would be heart breakingI reckon RTB poured a bit of cold water on it in his presser. His language was actually quite similar to what he used with Battle. Still, fingers crossed, would be an amazing moment for the club if he signed on.
To be fair I thought he sounded confident in the pre-game presser so might just be reading into it too much.Shieeeit I’ll have to suss, would be heart breaking
Being an older fart, I saw Stewart play a lot, and although Hunter has some very nice skills and played well today, Stewart would eat him for dinner- just aerobically a better player. I would still get Hunter to spend summer with a running coach.
Macrae comes in however kids like Phillipou , Boxsall and Carroll have now given us some options when needed.
We are slowly getting better and hopefully kids like Travaglia and Wilson develop to be key players for us as well.