Remove this Banner Ad

USA MAGA activist Charlie Kirk shot dead during Utah rally

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Okay. We've probably had enough of a free for all.

There are still forum and site posting guidelines, and you will abide by them.

A few seem to be of the opinion that now is a good time to have a crack at moderators or moderation. I'd rather like to discourage that impulse so I'm going to make it explicit: a moderator on this forum is a poster like any other, and can share their views and have free use of the forum like any other. If you feel a post breaches the rules report it; attacking a mod for their posting or objecting to a post purely because a moderator said it is grounds for an infraction and some time off.

From here, if you cannot speak civilly, you will not be allowed to participate.

Thanks all.
 
Last edited:
From the footage the shot went high and got Kirk in the throat, about a foot above his heart.

I have watched it (inadvertently).

The way he collapsed instantly from the neck down, his head flopped back and he made zero effort to grab at the wound (arms dropped to his sides) indicates a severed spine to me (along with a destroyed artery going from the immediate blood loss)

It was mercifully quick.

From the force of the impact and sound of the round, my guess is a high-powered rifle. 308 or higher. Maybe even 338.

Shooter didn’t take into account cosine effect, rounds from an elevated angle have less drop. Less drop = shot going high.

Without knowing ballistic details it’s impossible to know but seems like someone with experience with a rifle but without advanced knowledge or training.

Thoughts Malifice ?

Doubt he was aiming for the neck. It was likely a head shot that dropped and landed low. Scope probably wasn't zeroed properly, or just messed up the shot.
 
given we don't know why he was killed saying he was killed for expressing an opinion publicly would be guessing at this point

just like you saying publicly expressing an opinion is watering down what he was saying

a discussion on whether he was doing hate speech

so was he doing hate speech?

He was a young man (with a wife and children) expressing his opinion on what a democracy should act, no matter what side of the political aisle you may fall on he is free to do this.

The fact he is now dead shows where the world is, an absolute sh---hole.
 
Someone said, ‘I don’t support what happened to Charlie, but Charlie supported what happened to Charlie'
Just as an innocent pedestrian supports being killed by a drunk driver because they didn’t want alcohol banned.

I hate Trump and religion so it is easy to guess my opinion on Kirk but the people getting a thrill from his murder shows how sick people are.
 
He was a young man (with a wife and children) expressing his opinion on what a democracy should act, no matter what side of the political aisle you may fall on he is free to do this.

The fact he is now dead shows where the world is, an absolute sh---hole.
Lots of those around the world being killed for way less. Not sure why it’s taken this to show you where the world is….
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Kirk was trying to educate, especially brainwashed students who follow the crowd..wrongly. He spread logic. Some people don’t like logic.

Imagine hating someone’s opinion so much you feel the need to pull the trigger. Absolutely horrible. Thoughts are with his family

Logic?
The dude couldn't even work out that Trump is on every page of the Epstein files.
 
Okay, I’ve been googling a lot of the shit he’s allegedly said in here and a lot of them are taken out of context.

Where did he say this stoning homosexuals thing? I can’t find it.
The best I have found is him quoting a bible verse. The verse is below...

13 “‘If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.
 
He was a young man (with a wife and children) expressing his opinion on what a democracy should act, no matter what side of the political aisle you may fall on he is free to do this.

The fact he is now dead shows where the world is, an absolute sh---hole.
again completely irrelevant to my point

I'm not talking about his death, we don't know the actual reason currently

people suspect its because of his politics, meaning someone who disagrees with him did it

but we don't know

There's also this idea currently that racism is just a political opinion and therefore equally valid as someone saying raise welfare payments or fund public health

he actively agitated against the rights of people

he pushed christo fascism

he was part of the machine that is stoking violence and hatred among the population

people have been dying to political violence for as long as people have been alive

there's much bigger examples happening right now globally of where the world is than one agitator in America getting killed

The Prime Minister of Yemen was assassinated on the same day, state sanctioned political violence

There was another school shooting in Colorado on the same day, something Charlie thought was an acceptable cost for people to have access to guns

indeed he was quite happy to call violence against his political opponents good, he helped foster this

Having a family doesn't make you a good person or your life more important, being young doesn't make you a good person or your life more important

and dying doesn't excuse how you lived
 
The best I have found is him quoting a bible verse. The verse is below...

13 “‘If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.
Link? Context? If he was actually condoning such a thing I would be pretty surprised.
 
Just as an innocent pedestrian supports being killed by a drunk driver because they didn’t want alcohol banned.
I assume the pedestrian also supports drivers being tested and licensed.

And the modern world doesn't grind to a halt if guns are more regulated or certain ones banned, not exactly and apples to apples comparison here.
 
The best I have found is him quoting a bible verse. The verse is below...

13 “‘If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

 

Remove this Banner Ad



That isn't true?
The poster was taking issue with people saying he was killed for expressing opinions publicly. This just seems like a simple fact, I don’t know why we would try to caveat or water down that fact.

A discussion on whether we he was doing hate speech is a fair one to have. But people saying “people shouldn’t be killed for speaking” don’t need to be called out.

Yeah this is the crux of it. And the thing is I sort of understand an assassination attempt on Trump, I don't think it's right but he's an actual politician, Kirk is just a commentator, a very influential one of course.

Really I think he was killed because of the right wing influence he's having on younger people, he really did help Trump win the last election which probably put a target on his back.
 
I assume the pedestrian also supports drivers being tested and licensed.

And the modern world doesn't grind to a halt if guns are more regulated or certain ones banned, not exactly and apples to apples comparison here.
that is true. How about the unprovoked attack that kills someone though?

Do you actually think guns cause more problems then alcohol?
 
again completely irrelevant to my point

I'm not talking about his death, we don't know the actual reason currently

people suspect its because of his politics, meaning someone who disagrees with him did it

but we don't know

There's also this idea currently that racism is just a political opinion and therefore equally valid as someone saying raise welfare payments or fund public health

he actively agitated against the rights of people

he pushed christo fascism

he was part of the machine that is stoking violence and hatred among the population

people have been dying to political violence for as long as people have been alive

there's much bigger examples happening right now globally of where the world is than one agitator in America getting killed

The Prime Minister of Yemen was assassinated on the same day, state sanctioned political violence

There was another school shooting in Colorado on the same day, something Charlie thought was an acceptable cost for people to have access to guns


We do not know but it would be a reasonable assumption the vitriol he received on Collegiate campuses lead to some on the far left believing this as justification for murder. Some of the comments on X, etc would also indicate this. He agitated the rights of some which should happen as part of any political discourse; otherwise what is the point of open dialogue?

Having a mother explain to a 3 and 1 year old why their Dad was assassinated for "preaching" his cause simply should not happen. If you don’t like the man just ignore or find a candidate to challenge him.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Thanks, so it is out of context.
thor-is-he-though.jpg


"Just asking questions"
 
Just as an innocent pedestrian supports being killed by a drunk driver because they didn’t want alcohol banned.

I hate Trump and religion so it is easy to guess my opinion on Kirk but the people getting a thrill from his murder shows how sick people are.
Drink driving is illegal though.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom