I didn't lol
No Oppo Supporters 2025 AFL General Discussion
- Thread starter Ticky009
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
kickthething
Brownlow Medallist
Now get rid of the 6 6 6 warning and we will have the full set.
- Mar 29, 2019
- 6,914
- 17,937
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Lost of AFL news dropping today (the Commission has been busy!)
Tasmania draft concessions:
www.afl.com.au
- Devils will be handed picks No.1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, and the first selection of each subsequent round in their first draft, which is set to be in 2027 (must trade picks 5, 7, 11 and 13)
- $5 million sign-on bonus fund that will sit outside the salary cap
NGA eligibility changes:
www.afl.com.au
- all NGA applications from now on to rely on parents' cultural backgrounds
- at least one parent is required to have been born in an eligible country
- addition of the Pacific and Central and South American regions to the cultural eligibility criteria and the removal of European countries
Tasmania draft concessions:
Draft picks galore, $5m sign-on pool: Tasmania's list build rules revealed
The AFL's 19th club, Tasmania, will have access to a huge array of concessions as it builds its inaugural list
www.afl.com.au
- Devils will be handed picks No.1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, and the first selection of each subsequent round in their first draft, which is set to be in 2027 (must trade picks 5, 7, 11 and 13)
- $5 million sign-on bonus fund that will sit outside the salary cap
NGA eligibility changes:
AFL cracks down on player eligibility in NGA revamp
Clubs must spend more time with Next Generation Academy prospects and register their interest earlier in order to get priority draft access
www.afl.com.au
- all NGA applications from now on to rely on parents' cultural backgrounds
- at least one parent is required to have been born in an eligible country
- addition of the Pacific and Central and South American regions to the cultural eligibility criteria and the removal of European countries
If you go back to the 22 GF , the Cats were gifted by bad bounces falling into their laps and resulting in scores , even [PLAYERCARD]Josh Jenkins[/PLAYERCARD] who was on the bench for them said they were lucky with a lot of bounces
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Millky95
Starchild > You
Interchange cap needs to die first
SwansProudly
Moderator
- Sep 5, 2016
- 10,009
- 27,824
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Sydney Swans AFLW
- Moderator
- #3,131
done
AFL scraps centre bounce and sub rule, All-Aus team tweaked
The centre bounce and the substitute have been removed ahead of next season
www.afl.com.au
Millky95
Starchild > You
"We're not changing the number of interchanges or anything like that, so there'll be five on the bench. We want to try and lock that away for a long time … as certainly as long as I'm in the chair."done
AFL scraps centre bounce and sub rule, All-Aus team tweaked
The centre bounce and the substitute have been removed ahead of next season
Not quite. We should have unlimited interchanges
Rubbish , to get better scoring you need to cut it
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Correct, the less interchanges the more the game opens, there is a line though and that's why they have experts in this area- you and I are not in this area. Unlimited would just become a rugby scrum and we don't need it, it's ugly.
Millky95
Starchild > You
Average scores in the AFL have gone down since it was introduced
| Year | Average Goals | Average Behinds | Total Average Score |
| 2010 | 13.1 | 9.6 | 88.2 |
| 2011 | 13.5 | 9.7 | 90.7 |
| 2012 | 13.3 | 9.6 | 89.4 |
| 2013 | 13.4 | 9.4 | 89.8 |
| 2014 | 12.6 | 8.9 | 84.5 |
| 2015 | 12.6 | 8.6 | 84.2 |
| 2016 | 12.9 | 9.1 | 86.5 |
| 2017 | 12.9 | 9.5 | 86.9 |
| 2018 | 12 | 9 | 81 |
| 2019 | 11.6 | 8.6 | 78.2 |
| 2020 | 8.8 | 6.4 | 59.2 |
| 2021 | 11.5 | 8.5 | 77.5 |
| 2022 | 12.1 | 8.4 | 81 |
| 2023 | 12.1 | 8.5 | 81.1 |
| 2024 | 12.3 | 8.5 | 82.3 |
| 2025 | 12.3 | 8.8 | 82.6 |
Interchange Caps were introduced in 2014.
Source: https://afltables.com/afl/stats/yearly.html#ave
It's enough now and fair !
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Average scores in the AFL have gone down since it was introduced
Year Average Goals Average Behinds Total Average Score 2010 13.1 9.6 2011 13.5 9.7 2012 13.3 9.6 2013 13.4 9.4 2014 12.6 8.9 2015 12.6 8.6 2016 12.9 9.1 2017 12.9 9.5 2018 12 9 2019 11.6 8.6 2020 8.8 6.4 2021 11.5 8.5 2022 12.1 8.4 2023 12.1 8.5 2024 12.3 8.5 2025 12.3 8.8
Interchange Caps were introduced in 2014.
Source: https://afltables.com/afl/stats/yearly.html#ave
Take out the obvious outlier which is the COVID year and it's basically the same. If anything it shows the reduction hasn't gone far enough but this is expected. You also have to consider just how bad the bottom 6 sides were the last two years none of them could score. More 100 plus games these days than the rugby scrum matches in the late 2010's. Scoring up 4 points a game since 2021, that's better for fans.
We never kicked 100 points at home this year , what i can remember
Former Swan fitness guru Dave Missen has left St Scum as head of footy
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Yep, I've been on this all year, rubbish gameplan that just doesn't promote scoring. Then you want to attract the best players to a club? To do what? Score 75-85 points a game? It's just not attractive, that's just reality we have to be honest here. Compare that to Brisbane or Geelong they score 110 to 120 points heaps of times at home.
Now is this gameplan or is this personel or is it a bit of both? It's probably a bit of everything but bottom line for players to want to come they sure would want to see a gameplan that looks fun and exciting and can contend.
Millky95
Starchild > You
Wouldn't fair be unlimited and allow clubs to manage their players how they want? Unlimited interchanges means better footballers who just happen to have less tanks getting drafted instead of elite runners who have worse skills which would allow clubs to have more options at draft time
Seems more fair to me with no cap
Fair to you , not the look of the game , byeWouldn't fair be unlimited and allow clubs to manage their players how they want? Unlimited interchanges means better footballers who just happen to have less tanks getting drafted instead of elite runners who have worse skills which would allow clubs to have more options at draft time
Seems more fair to me with no cap
Maybe you can put in for the VFL gig
Millky95
Starchild > You
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Bye
Reports say the Demons will pay half of Olivers contract to get rid of him , thats about $700 K
kickthething
Brownlow Medallist
We have been down that path…you need fatigue in the game…unlimited interchange inhibits that as we saw before.
TheGoatBaron
Bigfooty’s Head Shake Officer
- Jan 4, 2010
- 28,424
- 21,335
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Port Melb, Eintracht Frankfurt.
More rule changes
kickthething
Brownlow Medallist
I am sure it was introduced to reduce congestion, not necessarily increase scoring, which complimented by other rules, eg 666 and stand rule I think achieved its goal. I don’t think there is any correlation to injuries and restricted interchange…..this was a topic a while back I recall. Drafting worse players, I reckon some crap players were probably drafted prior to restrictions on interchange so thats a long bow to draw.
- Status
