Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 5

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Here is PART 4

Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.

The Assassination of Charlie Kirk

Take Note

Anti-trans commentary and nastiness will be deleted and warnings issued.
 
How is it a distraction? You outright accused me of supporting murder based on my support for bombing boats carrying drugs that kill innumerable people each year in the US. The side effect (killing some of the people who willingly boarded said boats knowing they were a target) is unfortunate but I still support the boats being targeted.

My response initially wasn't to accuse you of supporting murder but to flesh out your views by asking a relatively simple and straightforward question. You refused to answer it (God knows why - maybe you're embarrassed by your beliefs). So while you can accuse me of supporting murder I can't even ask you a simple question to see if you accusation is a trifle hypocritical?

It's not a distraction. It's a perfectly legitimate discussion point in response to the accusation you leveled at me. You just don't have the balls to enage with it because you know what the end result will be.

It’s a distraction game.

You support a sex offender. No values. No morals.
 
How is it a distraction? You outright accused me of supporting murder based on my support for bombing boats carrying drugs that kill innumerable people each year in the US. The side effect (killing some of the people who willingly boarded said boats knowing they were a target) is unfortunate but I still support the boats being targeted.

My response initially wasn't to accuse you of supporting murder but to flesh out your views by asking a relatively simple and straightforward question. You refused to answer it (God knows why - maybe you're embarrassed by your beliefs). So while you can accuse me of supporting murder I can't even ask you a simple question to see if you accusation is a trifle hypocritical?

It's not a distraction. It's a perfectly legitimate discussion point in response to the accusation you leveled at me. You just don't have the balls to enage with it because you know what the end result will be.
Abortion isn't murder. Hope that helps.
 
faible After examining a discussion between you and Gralin on the topic of abortion I don't need a reply to the question I asked that you refused to answer yesterday. I've seen enough to know you don't view people who support abortion as supporting murder whilst you view my statements regarding the bombing of the drug boats in the Carribbean as supporting murder.

So this is what your philosophical position amounts to in a nutshell.

Supporting a decision to bomb boats carrying drugs that kill innumerable people each year in the US that has an unfortunate side effect of killing some of the people who willingly boarded said boats knowing they were a target (me) = "supporting murder".

Supporting an apparatus affording women the right to choose which has the unfortunate side effect of killing many healthy babies that weren't afforded such a choice (you) = definitely not in any way supporting murder. Interesting paradox.

Ok Mr Paradox. What if those babies grew up and became fisherman and/or drug traffickers.

Then you would be happy to blow them up.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

How is it a distraction? You outright accused me of supporting murder based on my support for bombing boats carrying drugs that kill innumerable people each year in the US. The side effect (killing some of the people who willingly boarded said boats knowing they were a target) is unfortunate but I still support the boats being targeted.

My response initially wasn't to accuse you of supporting murder but to flesh out your views by asking a relatively simple and straightforward question. You refused to answer it (God knows why - maybe you're embarrassed by your beliefs). So while you can accuse me of supporting murder I can't even ask you a simple question to see if you accusation is a trifle hypocritical? How is that in any way fair? As bourbons would say, how is this you acting as a "good faith operator".

It's not a distraction. It's a perfectly legitimate discussion point in response to the accusation you leveled at me. You just don't have the balls to enage with it because you know what the end result will be.
You never did answer the question from GP:

Would you be happy for Trump to bomb Lebbo if he was cooking fentanyl in his caravan, for example?


But it sounds like in your world poor old Lebbo would be in for a world of hurt.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Strawman.



Another Strawman.



Lie or statement without any proof.



Lie.

Going well as per usual.
You're even more clueless than could be thought possible if you believe the war mongering on Venezuela is about drugs.
You obviously still believe Saddam is hiding WMDs and Iran have nuclear weapons too.

You're equally clueless if you think trump was wearing jimmies when he was ****ing contestants in his teen beauty pageants and pr0n stars while he was expecting a child.

I know you're a hopeless simp but no one's that bad.
 
You never did answer the question from GP:

I did post a response to his question actually. Look back through the thread and you will find it. I can't be bothered to do so. In fact I can't be bothered discussing anything much any more with people who increasingly appear to be just plain evil, soulless individuals with no heart, who can't be reasoned with on any level.

I have seen a lot of mention lately of people taking a 'digital fast'. After this post I'm taking one. Maybe the Christmas season may soften some of your hearts and we can have a meaningful discussion next year. At the moment I'm both wasting my time and beating my head against a wall - for nothing.
 
So your position is that an unborn baby is not a person? Really?

What is it then?


Yes, this isn't a shocking position unless you live in a bubble.

It's an unborn baby, a foetus etc. Even societies that have significant numbers of people who say they are a person, and have rules/laws made up to fit their personal and/or religious beliefs, don't actually treat them as a person.
 
I have seen a lot of mention lately of people taking a 'digital fast'. After this post I'm taking one. Maybe the Christmas season may soften some of your hearts and we can have a meaningful discussion next year. At the moment I'm both wasting my time and beating my head against a wall - for nothing.
Tylenol Sandwich has decided that they can't functionally justify the MAGA crap anymore.
 
You are correct. I care very much about this issue at the moment. Ever since seeing this post on X last year.


I care about reproductive rights. And I used to be a strident "abortion is murder" proponent based on flimsy religious interpretation and upbringing, with all the "secular" arguments attached.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I did post a response to his question actually. Look back through the thread and you will find it. I can't be bothered to do so. In fact I can't be bothered discussing anything much any more with people who increasingly appear to be just plain evil, soulless individuals with no heart, who can't be reasoned with on any level.

I have seen a lot of mention lately of people taking a 'digital fast'. After this post I'm taking one. Maybe the Christmas season may soften some of your hearts and we can have a meaningful discussion next year. At the moment I'm both wasting my time and beating my head against a wall - for nothing.
Soften "our" hearts lol.

Let's not pretend we're the cold, unreasonable ones here.

Happy invented, commercialised season to you too.
 
I have seen a lot of mention lately of people taking a 'digital fast'. After this post I'm taking one.

Genuinely, it may not be a bad idea. Getting away from the hate fuelled, conspiratorial MAGA Twitter sphere and such might be good for you and you might have some realisations along the way.
 
Yes, this isn't a shocking position unless you live in a bubble.

It's an unborn baby, a foetus etc. Even societies that have significant numbers of people who say they are a person, and have rules/laws made up to fit their personal and/or religious beliefs, don't actually treat them as a person.

For that reason you don't start counting the age of a child until when they are born, not from the moment of conception
 

Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 5

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top