Not-a-cluey Best FOOTBALL RELATED RUMOUR you have heard from someone you trust 2025 Part 3 - Many lies and bullshit in here. Please read OP before posting

[Wosh]

The providers ("we", "us", "our") of the service provided by this web site ("Service") are not responsible for any user-generated content and accounts. Content submitted express the views of their author only.

Terms and rules

You must agree to these terms and rules before using the site.

www.bigfooty.com

Terms Of Service | Big Interest Group

 

[Pns_blister]

completely disagree, why would she live in brisbane, she may well chose to stay but theres 0 obligation for her to, if that same thing happened to me I know what I would be doing

Because the father has one year left on his contract and the best thing for the children would be to have access to BOTH parents. At the end of next when he is out of contract, that’s a different story.

 

[The Blue Max]

Fair to say he was probably good mates with the best friend's hubby too. Particularly if they holidayed together .

True - If you’re a power couple who haven’t actually achieved anything - you need a ‘host’ to cling to……like a sucker fish.

Ben and Tess were obviously very good suckers.

 

[Pns_blister]

Yeah he only cheated on his wife and mother of his children. What a great role model!

I’ll tell you right now a one year old and four year old do not care one iota, they want to see both parents. Both parties need to work through the separation with as minimal impact on the kids.

 

[Nunez]

Looking forward to the two-part special. First Zorko, then Neale.

Surely some YouTuber has the skills to put something together.

The Zorko situation was very different.

 

[Pns_blister]

Both my folks definitely cheated on each other and weren’t great role models for a relationship - they’re divorced now.

Still don’t mind em though, they were/are mostly good parents.

Correct. Weaponising children and removing access to one of their parents is never the answer, irrespective what the other party did. Unless the children communicate they don’t want to see them, or they are unsafe to see.

 

[mighty_lions]

Because the father has one year left on his contract and the best thing for the children would be to have access to BOTH parents. At the end of next when he is out of contract, that’s a different story.

how do you know thats whats "best for the children"

 

[The Blue Max]

Because the father has one year left on his contract and the best thing for the children would be to have access to BOTH parents. At the end of next when he is out of contract, that’s a different story.

He is going to find it mighty tough next season to maintain regular contact - doubt they’d play more than two games in WA.

Getting out of training obligations, travel time, negotiating access - what a freaking mess.

 

[mighty_lions]

Correct. Weaponising children and removing access to one of their parents is never the answer, irrespective what the other party did. Unless the children communicate they don’t want to see them, or they are unsafe to see.

Then that would be on Lachie, if it was a domestic violence issue would you still be advocating for the mother to stay???

 

[Pns_blister]

how do you know thats whats "best for the children"

I don’t. But I am a child psychologist that works through the impacts of this stuff for a living, so feel pretty qualified to weigh in.

 

[The Blue Max]

how do you know thats whats "best for the children"

You are sounding like you need to lash out.

Nothing that has been typed has been derogatory or wrong.

If you can’t handle the situation, go out and get p1ssed, laid, pick a fight or seek counselling - you’re behaving like a brat.

 

[Pns_blister]

Then that would be on Lachie, if it was a domestic violence issue would you still be advocating for the mother to stay???

Hence why I said unsafe.

 

[mighty_lions]

You are sounding like you need to lash out.

Nothing that has been typed has been derogatory or wrong.

If you can’t handle the situation, go out and get p1ssed, laid, pick a fight or seek counselling - you’re behaving like a brat.

what, for saying Jules can decide whats best for her and the kids? you've lost the plot

 

[mighty_lions]

Hence why I said unsafe.

You might want to look up what is considered domestic violence

 

[BomToydd]

I’ll tell you right now a one year old and four year old do not care one iota, they want to see both parents. Both parties need to work through the separation with as minimal impact on the kids.

Well they're definitely gonna see him less when he's busy ****ing his wife's best friend

 

[The Blue Max]

what, for saying Jules can decide whats best for her and the kids? you've lost the plot

You are reading stuff that isn’t there. What’s more, you’re arguing with qualified people on this issue. You’re flailing around like a shark attack victim.

 

[Pns_blister]

what, for saying Jules can decide whats best for her and the kids? you've lost the plot

It’s not just her decision, unless there is legal direction saying as much. Any parent taking this approach, is generally not acting within the best interests of their children.

 

[mighty_lions]

You are reading stuff that isn’t there. What’s more, you’re arguing with qualified people on this issue. You’re flailing around like a shark attack victim.

Who's qualified?

 

[mighty_lions]

It’s not just her decision, unless there is legal direction saying as much. Any parent taking this approach, is generally not acting within the best interests of their children.

im sure it could be a legal decision if she wanted it to be

 

[The Blue Max]

Who's qualified?

Read the previous posts from Pns-blister.

See, you’re so narked you’re not even reading things properly.

Post #2510.

 

[Pistol Night]

Who's qualified?

Everyone on BF

 

[Pns_blister]

Well they're definitely gonna see him less when he's busy ****ing his wife's best friend

I understand that people detest the alleged behaviour, but this has nothing to do with his capacity as a father and the children’s needs. A lot of emotional responses that are focusing on the behaviour and punishing the individual, not the kids.

 

[The Blue Max]

Everyone on BF

Post #2510.

 

[mighty_lions]

Read the previous posts from Pns-blister.

See, you’re so narked you’re not even reading things properly.

Post #2510.

lol a random person on Bigfooty thats a child psychologist does not know whats best for Jules and the kids only she will know

 

[The Blue Max]

lol a random person on Bigfooty thats a child psychologist does not know whats best for Jules and the kids only she will know

I think the conversation was a bit broader than that - nitpicking is a sign of someone who needs to win.

You have a considered, educated opinion - deal with it.

It’s not just her decision, unless there is legal direction saying as much. Any parent taking this approach, is generally not acting within the best interests of their children.

 

[BomToydd]

He is going to find it mighty tough next season to maintain regular contact - doubt they’d play more than two games in WA.

Getting out of training obligations, travel time, negotiating access - what a freaking mess.

Lmao you make him sound like a victim. He created the mess