Agree. I hate Essendon as much as the next guy (unless the next guy is Dermott Brereton) but I don't understand why some posters on here are repeatedly singling out 1 particular player.Yes - because it’s nigh on a criminal offence to be selected #1 in a draft and not turn into an absolute elite player.
I genuinely don’t get it.
He was never going to be delisted (that’s complete rubbish), and barring injuries, he will play 300 games, which is more than most guys selected at number 1 in a draft.
He himself was absolutely shocked to get selected at number 1 as he knew he wasn’t the most naturally talented.
He was chosen due to his intelligence, character and Robert Shaw’s recommendation (as his school coach) of his leadership qualities.
That’s why he is now their captain.
I wish him well.
Sure he's not the most damaging player, but he'll notch up 200 games this year and was a rd1 debut and has never left the side and has averaged 20 touches a game his last 7 seasons (was only just shy of that in his first 2).
I think you'd be pretty happy with that to get a 200 game player and a captain from pick 1. They aren't all going to be superstars and many have been duds for various reasons. (watts, mccartin, patton, boyd*, juh, JHF*, scully, kruezer,) That's 8 guys who given very minimum impact to the clubs that picked them. Then you've got a about 8-12 good players in walsh, swallow, gibbs, murphy types that McGrath fits in well with. And then the Rowell, Hodge, Reiwoldt, Delidio group who gave great service to their clubs and won BnFs, Norm Smiths, AA, etc..







