Taylor
Community Leader
- Moderator
- #1,226
I agree to an extent, but I'd also say that criticism of a party can be accepted by its rusted on base when the party room is being more moderate than the base is. Sky News and various online commentators routinely criticise the Liberal Party for not being conservative enough, and that doesn't annoy the rusted on Liberal voters because they want to see that too.
In theory something like that could also happen for Labor. But it hasn't, because Labor turned moderate many years ago. In that time, many of the more idealistic people on the left have switched to the Greens. Labor's current base is composed of either centrists who generally support where the party room is at, or pragmatists who are willing to park their ideals if they think it'll help Labor win elections. So they're not as willing to agree with complaints that Labor aren't progressive enough. This is why I call Labor a centrist party more than a centre-left one nowadays.
It helps that Labor politicians seem to be much more antagonistic to the Greens than Liberal politicians are to One Nation or other figures to their right. This "us and them" tribalism makes the Labor base annoyed at the more idealist left, and consequently more accepting of less ambitious Labor governments. The same is true of their counterparts in Britain with Jeremy Corbyn (and it could be argued the British Conservatives should have done the same with Nigel Farage) and of the US Democrats with AOC and Zohran Mamdani.
That is a fantastic point, the ALP in opposition are far more progressive than the ALP in government. It's been quite interesting to see the switch.






Ophidian Old Boys