Last nights game gave us all a chance to reflect on the decision we made at the 2003 draft.
At the time we were critisised heavily, even by our own for taking Bradley ahead of Tenace when we desperately needed pace.
I rated Tenace highly at the time, infact I thought he was better than Walker, Sylvia, McLean etc. Would have taken him in the top 3. However, as it seems he has improved little and is struggling at both AFL and VFL level. Tenace actually looks fat, but I could be the only one thinking that.
We went for Bradley and last season many had written it off as a huge mistake. There were even some suggesting we made a mistake in not taking Dyson with our first pick (you know who you are
).
At the end of the day we walked away from that draft with Bradley, Stanton, Dyson and Nash and as it stands the latter three are out performing Tenace and he doesn't look like catching them. Given, there is a long time to go in all of these guys respective careers.
Thoughts?
At the time we were critisised heavily, even by our own for taking Bradley ahead of Tenace when we desperately needed pace.
I rated Tenace highly at the time, infact I thought he was better than Walker, Sylvia, McLean etc. Would have taken him in the top 3. However, as it seems he has improved little and is struggling at both AFL and VFL level. Tenace actually looks fat, but I could be the only one thinking that.
We went for Bradley and last season many had written it off as a huge mistake. There were even some suggesting we made a mistake in not taking Dyson with our first pick (you know who you are
).At the end of the day we walked away from that draft with Bradley, Stanton, Dyson and Nash and as it stands the latter three are out performing Tenace and he doesn't look like catching them. Given, there is a long time to go in all of these guys respective careers.
Thoughts?


