2003 v 2002 Voting

[Kane McGoodwin]

Been meaning to look at the perfomances of our players compared to last year.

The big improvers were Johncock, Burton, Perrie & Shirley.

Those who fell by the way side were Goodwin, Biglands & Stenglein.

Player, 2003 Rank, 2003 Votes, 2002 Rank, 2002 Votes, Rank Change
Ricciuto 1 54 3 33 2
Edwards 2 34 5 29 3
McLeod 3 31 6 27 3
Burton 4 30 19 7 15
Johncock 5 23 21 5 16
Carey 6 20 n/a n/a n/a
Bode 7 15 2 35 -5
Torney 7 15 n/a n/a n/a
Perrie 9 13 n/a n/a n/a
Bickley 10 12 4 32 -6
Shirley 10 12 n/a n/a n/a
Hart 12 11 8 20 -4
Ladhams 12 11 12 12 0
Bassett 14 10 11 14 -3
Massie 14 10 15 10 1
Smart 16 9 19 7 3
Burns 16 9 n/a n/a n/a
McGregor 18 8 14 11 -4
Stevens 19 5 12 12 -7
Welsh 19 5 15 10 -4
Gallagher 19 5 24 1 5
Goodwin 22 4 7 23 -15
Biglands 22 4 8 20 -14
Stenglein 22 4 10 16 -12
Clarke 22 4 17 9 -5
Begley 22 4 n/a n/a n/a
Johnson n/a n/a 1 36 n/a
Doughty n/a n/a 18 8 n/a
Crowell n/a n/a 22 3 n/a
Fitzgerald n/a n/a 22 3 n/a

 

[macca23]

Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
Been meaning to look at the perfomances of our players compared to last year.

The big improvers were Johncock, Burton, Perrie & Shirley.

Those who fell by the way side were Goodwin, Biglands & Stenglein.

Interesting stuff Kane. It certainly is a very accurate reflection of the year.

To fall more than 10 positions such as Goodwin, Biglands & Stenglein did really tells a story about their performance as a whole for 2003.

Being right up the top doesn't give the big guns any scope for a large rise in the ratings but Johncock, Burton, Perrie & Shirley all deserved their climb up the ladder.

The only one that stands out as being unfairly rated by this system is McGregor, who had a good year, and his best yet. The answer to that of course is that he was very consistent without being dominating.