Remove this Banner Ad

2008 PDFL split

To change or not to change?

  • Nothing wrong with the current PDFL setup.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I like the proposed 3 tier system.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I would prefer a 2 Division PDFL only System.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Needs change ....Maybe another option.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

old picola league waiaa, deni, katunga, the u, hoppers, mathoura, picola, blighty..
So the west league would look something like
Leitchville-Gunbower, Hay, Wakool, Deni Rovers, Blighty, Picola, Waaia, Strathmerton, Finley, Mathoura, Yarroweyah, Jerilderie

The east league would be something like
Tungamah, Katandra, Katunga, Wunghnu, Shepp East, Dookie, Kattamatite, and the coreen and benalla league clubs, sorry not sure of them all.

My tip:

Katandra, Shepp East, Dookie United, Tungamah, Katamatite.

(these 5 clubs would provide enough fire works on there own!)

Break away from the PDFL, invite the likes of Congupna, Violet Town & Tallygaroopna in and Goorambat if they think they are up to it.

Would leave the PDFL with 11 teams.
KDFL with 10 teams.
Comp 1
Berrigan 571.2
Jeriliderie 758.5
Katandra 404.5
Strathy 396.1
Tunga 396.1
Katty 304.1
Dookie 453.7
S.E. 476.3

Comp 2(doesn't include distances to Blighty )
Math. 456.9
Katunga 293.4
Yarra 352.9
Picola 291.7
Rovers 587.9
The U 352.5
Waaia 296.3

.
Rennies proposal to join the current PDFL, rejected short term but certainly leave the door open for the future and after the current PDFL debacile is sorted out.
Immediate, for 2009 season, change to the current PDFL format.

Heres my latest crack of the split :

Comp # 1 ( The 8 most successfull sides over the past 10 years, Blighty Jerilderie , gone with gut feeling of abilty to sustain success )
Waaia
Katandra
Tungamah
Shepp East
Jeriliderie
Dookie
Strathy
Kattamatitie


Comp # 2 ( the 8 less successful sides over the past 10 years, Blighty and Jerilderie is a difficult one but gone with gut feeling of being able to sustain success)

Blighty
Katunga
Yarroweyah
Berrigan
Mathoura
Picola
Deni Rovers
Wunghnu

Both comps to be run individually , however certain regulations to apply.

Comp #1
If a side finishes bottom of the ladder for 2 consecutive seasons they shall be offered the opportunity to drop down to comp 2, if they finish bottom 3 years in a row they are automatically replaced by the most succesfull side over 3 years in comp 2, if there is two sides which have achieved equal success in comp 2 over that time the most succesfull in the past season will automatically be elevated.
If a side finishes bottom 2, 5 years consecutive they shall be offered the same relegation.

Comp # 2
If a side finishes top of the ladder for 2 consecutive seasons they shall be offered the opportunity to jump up to comp 1, if they finish finish top 3 years in a row they automatically replace the less most sucessful side in comp 1, if there is two sides which have been equally unsucessfull in comp 1 the least sucessful in the previous season should be relegated.
If a side finishes top 2, 5 years consecutive they shall be offered the same elevation.

Funny enough travel ends up as goods as any system I have tried !

League 1
Billabong
Berrigan
Jerilderie
Blighty
Rennie
Yarroweyah
Kattie
Strathy
Deni??
Katunga??

Leauge 2

Dookie
Shep east
Tunga
Katandra
Waaia
Wunghu
Picola
Mathoura
Voilet Town??? (With Katunga or Deni??)
Heres some of the previous proposals, minus some of the bullsh!t, sales pitches, which accompanied them.
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

Originally Posted by BACKS SORE!
League 1
Billabong
Berrigan
Jerilderie
Blighty
Rennie
Yarroweyah
Kattie
Strathy
Deni

Colley

Leauge 2
Katunga
Dookie
Shep east
Tunga
Katandra
Waaia
Wunghu
Picola
Mathoura
Voilet Town
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

Pretty happy to stick with the below proposal, think all considerations of a split must be done based on the current 16 clubs only .

Immediate, for 2009 season, change to the current PDFL format.

Comp # 1 ( The 8 most successfull sides over the past 10 years, Blighty Jerilderie , gone with gut feeling of abilty to sustain success )
Waaia
Katandra
Tungamah
Shepp East
Jeriliderie
Dookie
Strathy
Kattamatitie


Comp # 2 ( the 8 less successful sides over the past 10 years, Blighty and Jerilderie is a difficult one but gone with gut feeling of being able to sustain success)

Blighty
Katunga
Yarroweyah
Berrigan
Mathoura
Picola
Deni Rovers
Wunghnu

Both comps to be run individually , however certain regulations to apply.

Comp #1
If a side finishes bottom of the ladder for 2 consecutive seasons they shall be offered the opportunity to drop down to comp 2, if they finish bottom 3 years in a row they are automatically replaced by the most succesfull side over 3 years in comp 2, if there is two sides which have achieved equal success in comp 2 over that time the most succesfull in the past season will automatically be elevated.
If a side finishes bottom 2, 5 years consecutive they shall be offered the same relegation.

Comp # 2
If a side finishes top of the ladder for 2 consecutive seasons they shall be offered the opportunity to jump up to comp 1, if they finish finish top 3 years in a row they automatically replace the less most sucessful side in comp 1, if there is two sides which have been equally unsucessfull in comp 1 the least sucessful in the previous season should be relegated.
If a side finishes top 2, 5 years consecutive they shall be offered the same elevation.

Funny enough travel ends up as goods as any system I have tried !

Hope all makes sense !!
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

I was talking to one of our clubs senior officials and he was telling me that the murray league and picola league have been in contact regarding a merger between the two leagues with a 3 teir split of the comp. 10 in the top two teirs and 9 in the other. If this happens Rennie should have a very good chance of getting into the league to even up the numbers in each comp.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

I was talking to one of our clubs senior officials and he was telling me that the murray league and picola league have been in contact regarding a merger between the two leagues with a 3 teir split of the comp. 10 in the top two teirs and 9 in the other. If this happens Rennie should have a very good chance of getting into the league to even up the numbers in each comp.

Let's hope this is true this time
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

Pretty happy to stick with the below proposal, think all considerations of a split must be done based on the current 16 clubs only .

Immediate, for 2009 season, change to the current PDFL format.

Comp # 1 ( The 8 most successfull sides over the past 10 years, Blighty Jerilderie , gone with gut feeling of abilty to sustain success )
Waaia
Katandra
Tungamah
Shepp East
Jeriliderie
Dookie
Strathy
Kattamatitie


Comp # 2 ( the 8 less successful sides over the past 10 years, Blighty and Jerilderie is a difficult one but gone with gut feeling of being able to sustain success)

Blighty
Katunga
Yarroweyah
Berrigan
Mathoura
Picola
Deni Rovers
Wunghnu

Both comps to be run individually , however certain regulations to apply.

Comp #1
If a side finishes bottom of the ladder for 2 consecutive seasons they shall be offered the opportunity to drop down to comp 2, if they finish bottom 3 years in a row they are automatically replaced by the most succesfull side over 3 years in comp 2, if there is two sides which have achieved equal success in comp 2 over that time the most succesfull in the past season will automatically be elevated.
If a side finishes bottom 2, 5 years consecutive they shall be offered the same relegation.

Comp # 2
If a side finishes top of the ladder for 2 consecutive seasons they shall be offered the opportunity to jump up to comp 1, if they finish finish top 3 years in a row they automatically replace the less most sucessful side in comp 1, if there is two sides which have been equally unsucessfull in comp 1 the least sucessful in the previous season should be relegated.
If a side finishes top 2, 5 years consecutive they shall be offered the same elevation.

Funny enough travel ends up as goods as any system I have tried !

Hope all makes sense !!


Great idea, shows great insight on your part :D
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

Let's get realistic here..... This may seem a bit out there, but I really think looking at the trend of small farming towns and communities, Eg Cropping area's & dairy farming, or even mixed farms whatever.... I belive in the next 5 to 10 years (If the drought continues) at least 3- 4 teams will be gone or at least have to merge! Here's what I reckon MIGHT happen

Berrigan will be gone or have to merge with Oaklands or Finley?? (Same with Finley)

Blighty will ge gone or have to merge with Finley???

Yarroweyah will be gone or have to merge with Strathy or Katuga???

Mathoura???????

There's a few I reckons future's are on the line, mainly due to employment or cropping failures. And because people and family's leave the area... (I hope it rains:thumbsu:)

So therefore the league restructure might speed this up or prolong the survival, these clubs. Cheers
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

I was talking to one of our clubs senior officials and he was telling me that the murray league and picola league have been in contact regarding a merger between the two leagues with a 3 teir split of the comp. 10 in the top two teirs and 9 in the other. If this happens Rennie should have a very good chance of getting into the league to even up the numbers in each comp.

I would think that current MFL clubs would like a bit of warning, perhaps this would suit Congupna and Finley at the moment but I don't think they'd be too happy. Then you'd have to choose between Echuca Utd and Mulwala to come down. Does everyone remember where Moama finished in 2007?

A better way to do it would be to leave the MFL as is for 2009, let them know that a MFL/PDFL tier system is on its way. Then the team that finishes last place is relegated for 2010 season. Do this again in 2011 and 2012 and each team will know the expectation. (Club Champion points should also be considered and other variables).

2009: Div 1 = 13 teams, Div 2 = 8 teams, Div 3 = 8 teams
2010: Div 1 = 12 teams, Div 2 = 9 teams, Div 3 = 8 teams
2011: Div 1 = 11 teams, Div 2 = 9 teams, Div 3 = 9 teams
2012: Div 1 = 10 teams, Div 2 = 10 teams, Div 3 = 9 teams

Of course if Rennie or other teams are admitted then number will change. As many people have stated in the past, you don't mind travelling for a decent game, and the 3 tier Murray Valley FL could be the answer.

Heaps more problems like jumper clashes:
Numurkah: Katandra
Echuca United: Shepp East
Barooga: Tungamah
Cobram: Katty
Congupna: Blighty etc....
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

I would think that current MFL clubs would like a bit of warning, perhaps this would suit Congupna and Finley at the moment but I don't think they'd be too happy. Then you'd have to choose between Echuca Utd and Mulwala to come down. Does everyone remember where Moama finished in 2007?

A better way to do it would be to leave the MFL as is for 2009, let them know that a MFL/PDFL tier system is on its way. Then the team that finishes last place is relegated for 2010 season. Do this again in 2011 and 2012 and each team will know the expectation. (Club Champion points should also be considered and other variables).

2009: Div 1 = 13 teams, Div 2 = 8 teams, Div 3 = 8 teams
2010: Div 1 = 12 teams, Div 2 = 9 teams, Div 3 = 8 teams
2011: Div 1 = 11 teams, Div 2 = 9 teams, Div 3 = 9 teams
2012: Div 1 = 10 teams, Div 2 = 10 teams, Div 3 = 9 teams

Of course if Rennie or other teams are admitted then number will change. As many people have stated in the past, you don't mind travelling for a decent game, and the 3 tier Murray Valley FL could be the answer.

Heaps more problems like jumper clashes:
Numurkah: Katandra
Echuca United: Shepp East
Barooga: Tungamah
Cobram: Katty
Congupna: Blighty etc....

Some very valid points I.W.A.F., I personally think the biggest difficulty would be to avoid traditionally strong top 4 sides in the Murray League in the juniors or netball playing against sides, which may not be that strong in the PDFL in that middle tier and can't think of a solution.
Would think the greater the standard difference between the top side and the bottom side in relegation/evelation the greater the gap is going to obviously be in some games in some grades ??
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

Wednesday, 15th October 2008

Rennie not in, but clubs seek to restructure league
Teo Pellizzeri


Splitting Picola District Football League has become a distinct possibility after a meeting on Monday night where league executive answered clubs' requests to consider a two-division structure.
Clubs have been asked to come to the next league meeting on October 24 with proposals for a two-division competition, where if consensus is met, the 16-team league will split.

Hume Football League club Rennie was denied entry to the Picola District league on Monday, but the door has not yet been closed on it joining next season.

Rennie needed nine of the 16 existing league clubs to approve its application for entry into the competition next season, but was narrowly voted down.

Counting was stopped after the Grasshoppers were mathematically eliminated from gaining the yes vote from nine clubs.

But league president David McKenzie said the opportunity for Rennie to join the league had not been completely wiped off, as a number of clubs requested a genuine moratorium on the 16-team league splitting into two divisions.

McKenzie said if the clubs could reach consensus on a split at the next meeting the league executive would submit the model to the Victorian Country Football League for approval.

``If (the clubs) agree to split the league it will be done,'' McKenzie said.

``Each club has been asked to write to the league or e-mail what it believes the split should be.''

McKenzie said an amicable split of the 16 existing teams might leave a second opportunity for Rennie to join the competition.

``The door hasn't been closed on them just yet,'' he said.

nothing that hasn't already been discussed on here. i wonder what the split will be? will all the clubs go for it or are some committed to 16?
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

Let's get realistic here..... This may seem a bit out there, but I really think looking at the trend of small farming towns and communities, Eg Cropping area's & dairy farming, or even mixed farms whatever.... I belive in the next 5 to 10 years (If the drought continues) at least 3- 4 teams will be gone or at least have to merge! Here's what I reckon MIGHT happen

Berrigan will be gone or have to merge with Oaklands or Finley?? (Same with Finley)

Blighty will ge gone or have to merge with Finley???

Yarroweyah will be gone or have to merge with Strathy or Katuga???

Mathoura???????

There's a few I reckons future's are on the line, mainly due to employment or cropping failures. And because people and family's leave the area... (I hope it rains:thumbsu:)

So therefore the league restructure might speed this up or prolong the survival, these clubs. Cheers

Do ya really think that could happen? if it did come to that wouldnt ya just pay players more and more to keep them at the club? yeah bring on the rain cant have berrigan playing with finley.
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

I think that the only way to split the league is to have the most successful teams from the last 5-10 years in div 1 as Pace suggested. but instaed of basing the promotion/relegation system on how successful a clubs senior footy team is, the system should be based on how successful a CLUB as whole is. Netball and football, all grades. Have the same deal with the club champion points but instead of having the footy and netball seperate, have them combined so you can judge the most successful CLUB, not the most successful senior footy team. At the end of each season give the CLUB that is the most successful in div 2 the option to go up to div 1. If they don't want to do that give the option to the CLUB that came second. If they also dont want it then both divisions remain the same, with the CLUB that came last in div 1 getting another year in the top teir.
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

I think that the only way to split the league is to have the most successful teams from the last 5-10 years in div 1 as Pace suggested. but instaed of basing the promotion/relegation system on how successful a clubs senior footy team is, the system should be based on how successful a CLUB as whole is. Netball and football, all grades. Have the same deal with the club champion points but instead of having the footy and netball seperate, have them combined so you can judge the most successful CLUB, not the most successful senior footy team. At the end of each season give the CLUB that is the most successful in div 2 the option to go up to div 1. If they don't want to do that give the option to the CLUB that came second. If they also dont want it then both divisions remain the same, with the CLUB that came last in div 1 getting another year in the top teir.

Spot on i reckon. The club needs to have the final say. They need to be given the option to go up a league or down a league. If the 17 teams( with Renne in) split it would make a 9 and 8 league team. If division 1 was the 9 league team and one side wanted to go down a league but no other side wanted to be promoted, easy, division 1 becomes the 8 team league for the following year. It may chop and change over the initial 4-5 years but as long as it is under one banner there is no need to involve the VCFL hence making the decisions alot easier to administrate. The main point here must be the long future of all the clubs currently in the PDFL. If splitting the way PTF has suggested helps that goal, just do it and stop beating around the bushes. Will be an exciting couple of weeks. It needs to happen soon though so that clubs can start some serious recruiting. Makes it a bit difficult at the moment when we dont know who we are playing against and what part of the country side we might be travelling to. We are all in the same boat though.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

I would think that current MFL clubs would like a bit of warning, perhaps this would suit Congupna and Finley at the moment but I don't think they'd be too happy. Then you'd have to choose between Echuca Utd and Mulwala to come down. Does everyone remember where Moama finished in 2007?

A better way to do it would be to leave the MFL as is for 2009, let them know that a MFL/PDFL tier system is on its way. Then the team that finishes last place is relegated for 2010 season. Do this again in 2011 and 2012 and each team will know the expectation. (Club Champion points should also be considered and other variables).

2009: Div 1 = 13 teams, Div 2 = 8 teams, Div 3 = 8 teams
2010: Div 1 = 12 teams, Div 2 = 9 teams, Div 3 = 8 teams
2011: Div 1 = 11 teams, Div 2 = 9 teams, Div 3 = 9 teams
2012: Div 1 = 10 teams, Div 2 = 10 teams, Div 3 = 9 teams

Of course if Rennie or other teams are admitted then number will change. As many people have stated in the past, you don't mind travelling for a decent game, and the 3 tier Murray Valley FL could be the answer.

Heaps more problems like jumper clashes:
Numurkah: Katandra
Echuca United: Shepp East
Barooga: Tungamah
Cobram: Katty
Congupna: Blighty etc....

Sounds well thought out there IWAF, MFL would be under no pressure for next year unless the likes of Fin or Con want to drop down.
With the jumpers teams can just do what Toc and Con do.
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

Sounds well thought out there IWAF, MFL would be under no pressure for next year unless the likes of Fin or Con want to drop down.
With the jumpers teams can just do what Toc and Con do.
Would involving the MFL assist the PDFL clubs and how ??
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

Having a comp which one is higher or lower standard than the other, or going up a level, Div1 and Div2 how ever you want to word it is ABSOULUTE CRAP!!!! At the end of the day if a young bloke wants to better his footy they will go to a, GV, OM or Murray league club. The solution is simple the VCFL need to get there act together and sit down with the PDFL, KDFL & Hume or (AFL NSW/ACT) and work out the best way of splitting teams in the area so you can have at least two 9 team comps that will Logistically work, so every team play twice and the standard remains at the same sort of level!! This may take 12 to 18 months?? So VCFL pull ya finger out and get to work with our clubs and other leagues and lets find an answer!!!!!!
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

:thumbsu:
Do ya really think that could happen? if it did come to that wouldnt ya just pay players more and more to keep them at the club? yeah bring on the rain cant have berrigan playing with finley.

No rain no crop's or feed, No crops or feed no work, no work no sponsorship, no sponsorship no money!!!!!!!!
(Please let it rain:thumbsu::thumbsu:)
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

The posting guidelines appear to be causing some mis-understanding amongst some posters, please read and understand the below ones in particular :

ALSO :
Posts upon here stating this or that shouldn't be posted, or " you big mouth posters upon here " or the like will be edited, it is a public forum and administrators and mods. will make the decision upon what is right and wrong and will not tolerate any attempt to intimidate anybody upon here.

* Obviously it gets a bit hairy when we talk about some subjects within footy especially our own clubs or players, but lets stay on the topic. People don't want to read slanging matches between two posters.

* General chit chat between posters should be kept to PM or MSN.

* Posting rumours is OK, as long as its football related ie.

* If there is anything which breaks the forum rules, I'll edit your posts and send you a PM outlining the reasons.

Feel free to argue the point with me, just don't get personal. It adds nothing to the arguement.

* If you feel you are being harassed by certain posters, or have any issues at all, please PM me. If I can't sort them out then I will pass them on to someone who can !

* If you have something you wish to post but are not sure of whether it's inside the forum rules PM me first.

* If you have league news you wish to post anonymously PM me.

* Feel free to continue your thoughts about all clubs and issues and have fun discussing local footy
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

There are a lot of strong views being expressed about the recent league decision and where the league is heading and rightfully so, as it will impact upon all league followers.
There is also a lot of defamatory bullsh!t being whipped up, especially about the contents of Monday nights league meeting, so stick to the topic, confirm all information you may have and respect peoples opinions or it will be edited or deleted.:mad::mad:
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

would more clubs be interested in a geographical model east-west or a promotion-relegation model based on stregth? div 2 champions go up, wooden spooners go down.
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

If that were to be, what would happen if say the Div2 winner does not want to progress into Div1, wanting to win another premiership? Or would it be a rule? Could make it hard for clubs wanting to go back to back!
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

would more clubs be interested in a geographical model east-west or a promotion-relegation model based on stregth? div 2 champions go up, wooden spooners go down.
Year to year promotion - relegation should not be considered, would be more changes that what the league has experienced over the last few years, over a longer period has merit.

Heres a few thoughts, why split the league in 2009 if we are already being told we are going to see changes 2010 ?
Maybe people should be upfront with this before any other matters get discussed, not after a discussion has taken place and voted on for splitting the league ?
To split the comp. into 2 x 8, with no relegation/promotion, I think will see some clubs faced with difficulties, and considering their future, within 5 years, if done by standard, the clubs which are forced to play against the recent stronger clubs Waaia, Shepp East, Dookie, Katandra, Tungamah may struggle to be competitive over long periods, whilst also permitting other clubs to dominate the lesser comp.
If done by location the inbalance of competition will see some of the current long term lower placed clubs in further difficulty.
Personally don't think a split can be done involving the current 16 clubs, whilst having every clubs future in mind, without relegation/promotion.

Going to be some interesting thoughts placed around at next league meeting ??
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

What are the proposed 2010 changes?

Is Coleambally & Billabong Crows on the agenda?
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

Okay guys, without any of the 'sales pitches' post your BEST idea for the make up of the PDFL into the future:

PDFL
Berrigan
Blighty
Deniliquin Rovers
Jerilderie
Katunga
Mathoura
Picola United
Strathmerton
Waaia
Wunghnu
Yarroweyah
(Rennie if they want them)

TFL
Dookie United
Katamatite
Katandra
Shepparton East
Tungamah

Invite Congupna, Tallygaroopna, Violet Town, Benalla All Blacks and Goorambat to join.
 
Re: CHANGES TO CURRENT PDFL ( merged ) NEW COMP / MFL/PDFL 3 Division System Threads

i;wantanotherflag12866617 said:
Okay guys, without any of the 'sales pitches' post your BEST idea for the make up of the PDFL into the future:

PDFL
Berrigan
Blighty
Deniliquin Rovers
Jerilderie
Katunga
Mathoura
Picola United
Strathmerton
Waaia
Wunghnu
Yarroweyah
(Rennie if they want them)

TFL
Dookie United
Katamatite
Katandra
Shepparton East
Tungamah

Invite Congupna, Tallygaroopna, Violet Town, Benalla All Blacks and Goorambat to join.

PDFL1
Berrigan
Blighty
Deniliquin Rovers
Jerilderie
Katunga
Mathoura?-mentioned on kdfl thread that they are looking that way
Picola United
waaia
Strathmerton
Wunghnu
Yarroweyah

PDFL2(TFL)
Dookie United
Katamatite
Katandra
Shepparton East
Tungamah
rennie

this is how i heard the league might be split. would have to invite clubs from other leagues to join pdfl2, BDFL could be on the way out so those clubs might join
 

Remove this Banner Ad

2008 PDFL split

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top