- Banned
- #26
Why use SOS as a kick in player when you had Ang?Agree with you on Dean & Macca, but SOS was a very ordinary kick. There was a reason why he was banned from kicking out after behinds. A number of costly turnovers after behinds which resulted in 7 point plays saw the likes of Campo, Braddles etc given the kick out duties long before this became commonplace.
SOS was an ordinary kick out player, but I wasn't worried when SOS had the ball in his hands and was running down the field. Langford was a poorer kick of the footy than SOS and had no idea what to do when lining up for a goal. SOS wasn't a classical kick like Southy or even Christou, yet he was effective and kicked 202 goals in his career with 10 against Fitzroy being his best return.
I was always more worried when Spalding and Waite had the ball in their hands.
We dodged a bullet here.
http://www.blueseum.org/tiki-index.php?page=Stephen+Silvagni
Then, when he impressed enough in the Interstate Carnival to be selected in the Australian team to tour Ireland, it sparked strong interest from Hawthorn. Under VFL rules of the day, Steve was zoned to the Hawks and they had first call on him - unless Carlton claimed him under the father/son rule. When Hawthorn set a 48 hour deadline for Carlton to act, Blues' Secretary Ian Collins didn't hesitate. Stephen Silvagni became a Carlton player - on the minimum contract wage of the time.
"Serge was terrific in the way he allowed Stephen to develop naturally, rather than by force," Collins said later; "some kids who play footy at a young age either get sick of it or resent it and want to do other things. Consequently they never fulfil their potential. But Stephen wasn't like that. there was balance in his life, which helped him in his football as well. There might have been games being played at the time of Stephen's signing, but there was never any doubt - he was always going to be playing for Carlton. Serge and Rita wouldn't have allowed him to go to Hawthorn, let alone encouraged him to go there."



