Game Day 2024 Round 10 Discussion - Indigenous Round

[spudmaster]

Any word on whether Mr Sniffles is likely to be back for Port to resume his cash-generation for us all?

 

[Maybe Tomorrow]

Rogers out is doubly annoying as he won't have played enough games for DPP now.

 

[Nelso]

Rogers not even useful as a loop option this week.

 

[gutsroy]

Stanley will be back next week. Conway isn't going to play enough to be useful for SC.

Chris Scott has found a way to ruin him this year AND next year. Inventive kent that he is.

Yeah, definitely got some factors working against him.
But he'd go up about 60k belting out a 90 and if Sweet is out, might be an option for some w/ R3 flexibility.
100% not your ideal scenario, but that went straight down the gurgler when Sweet Surrender put this fella up...

 

[Judd_Magic]

Any word on whether Mr Sniffles is likely to be back for Port to resume his cash-generation for us all?

He's back at full training that's all we know at this stage. Wait for teams tomorrow, the campaigner better be back.

 

[Wellsy35]

If O'Connor and Mullin tag a mid, would GC make Davies the sub......he only played 1/2 a game last week up there.
He could come on for the one tagged out of it......if that makes sense

Isn’t it more likely they send someone forward/back and chuck Flanders in the mids like they did last week (with Anderson?)?

Out of the bench list, Uwland DEF rotation and likely not sub, Day FWD rotation, Davies MID, Ainsworth wing/HF?. Sexton surplus to requirements there.

Hope you’re right though - Davies did have to get subbed out due to cramp last week.

 

[Wellsy35]

Sexton has BE -2 so he should get that even if he's SUB or subbed off

I was kinda relying on him to play, as I’ve now got Kerch and Graham out as well.

Will now probably need to cash in Kerch and Graham so that I can upgrade and avoid a donut…

 

[No eye deer]

Graham and Rogers out and GC playing the first game this week reminds me of a small town in WA…..

 

[gutsroy]

This is correct, yeah?
Won't know re Sweet til Fri 17:00(?)
So if looking at Conway as R3 fallback, have to go in blind without knowing if he's even needed?
Awkward week.
No good loops, rookies you'd want to loop playing against each other in the same game etc.
Suppose folks who went McKercher much unluckier, to be fair.

 

[Judd_Magic]

This is correct, yeah?
Won't know re Sweet til Fri 17:00(?)
So if looking at Conway as R3 fallback, have to go in blind without knowing if he's even needed?
Awkward week.
No good loops, rookies you'd want to loop playing against each other in the same game etc.
Suppose folks who went McKercher much unluckier, to be fair.

If Sweet is named though tomorrow then surely he plays.

 

[stevebbb]

This is correct, yeah?
Won't know re Sweet til Fri 17:00(?)
So if looking at Conway as R3 fallback, have to go in blind without knowing if he's even needed?
Awkward week.
No good loops, rookies you'd want to loop playing against each other in the same game etc.
Suppose folks who went McKercher much unluckier, to be fair.

If Sweet is named though tomorrow then surely he plays.

I reckon they'll make it clear if Sweet is back. "Sweet returns from illness", something like that. And whoever is named on-field in the rucks will give it away.

 

[Northernsoul74]

36% of the top 5% of players own Rogers

Trade him to Sullivan. We started with 40 trades, plenty.

 

[gutsroy]

I reckon they'll make it clear if Sweet is back. "Sweet returns from illness", something like that. And whoever is named on-field in the rucks will give it away.

Just officially, though, so they already name an extended squad on the Thursday, yeah?
If so, yeah, all good, if Sweet is in, he'll be on-field.
Just having a brain fade, getting confused as to when the Sun extended squads are there. If they are there Thu, then happy days, like you say, 100%

 

[Veer Right]

Random - Working out how much players will rise or fall (during a round) going by their BE, i am finding (X x 455 =) is close enough to accurate.

 

[Scythe94]

Sexton the sub there imo. Two defenders on the bench and Uwland had his best AFL game last week, be stiff to get made sub.

Conversely, reckon Sexton would be pretty stiff based off these comments, too.

 

[Judd_Magic]

Conversely, reckon Sexton would be pretty stiff based off these comments, too.

I'm wondering who will be sub?

Thats a strong bench that tbe suns have.

 

[gutsroy]

Random - Working out how much players will rise or fall (during a round) going by their BE, i am finding (X x 455 =) is close enough to accurate.

Thereabouts.
Formula is that week's magic number /12
Because price formula contains average of last three scores (so divide by 3) and the rolling average portion of the price contributes 25%, with 75% coming from the current price (so ultimately, divider by 3, divide by 4 = divide by 12
New Price = Old Price * 0.75 + 3-rd avg * MN * 0.25.

Weekly MN easy to work out using 1-2 players: scores and BEs:

If hit BE,old price = new price
So 3 Rd avg * MN = current price
MN = current price/3-rd avg
3-rd avg if hit BE = (BE + last score + score before that) /3
MN = 3*current price / (BE + last two scores)

Take LDU:

MN = 3*528,500/(102 BE + 90 + 109)
MN this week = 5,267 odd

Dividing that by 12, I get $439/pt

So very close to what you got
TempletonTheRat you're sharp on the MN stuff, no? Or is it Northernsoul74

 

[gutsroy]

Time for some Scoops on Scoops violence after that shit haha

 

[gutsroy]

Conversely, reckon Sexton would be pretty stiff based off these comments, too.

If Jumping Jack Lukosius can keep getting a guernsey with the shit he pumps out, Secco is set for a six week block minimum given he actually touched the footy and did something with it, surely

 

[Scythe94]

I'm wondering who will be sub?

Thats a strong bench that tbe suns have.

Swallow was named at half-back in Round 4 and was made the sub – being named on-field isn't an ironclad guarantee that you're avoiding the vest, even though it is common practice.

 

[Wellsy35]

Swallow was named at half-back in Round 4 and was made the sub – being named on-field isn't an ironclad guarantee that you're avoiding the vest, even though it is common practice.

Just noticed Rowell is named at CHB hahaha wouldn’t Red Bull sub be carnage?

 

[Judd_Magic]

Just noticed Rowell is named at CHB hahaha wouldn’t Red Bull sub be carnage?

Why on earth would Rowell be sub for? LOL!

 

[Maybe Tomorrow]

Conversely, reckon Sexton would be pretty stiff based off these comments, too.

Sexton is back in because Powell said a naughty word, not because of anything he worked on.

 

[gutsroy]

Sexton is back in because Powell said a naughty word, not because of anything he worked on.

Aah, just caught wind of this.
Had no idea.
On its face, it's a bit of a joke.
Not condoning it, but:
The angry dwarf gets a pat on the back despite all the form in the world and **** all contrition, let's be honest.
Big Finners pretends to be sorry, gets three and then goes on his podcast and tells the world he's seething and hard done by. All good Finners, love your work, champ.
And yeah, it's only words, but Powell front footed it,.actually appeared pretty sincere, and he's the one that cops 5 weeks.
Make it make sense.

 

[Maybe Tomorrow]

Aah, just caught wind of this.
Had no idea.
On its face, it's a bit of a joke.
Not condoning it, but:
The angry dwarf gets a pat on the back despite all the form in the world and heck all contrition, let's be honest.
Big Finners pretends to be sorry, gets three and then goes on his podcast and tells the world he's seething and hard done by. All good Finners, love your work, champ.
And yeah, it's only words, but Powell front footed it,.actually appeared pretty sincere, and he's the one that cops 5 weeks.
Make it make sense.

Meh, did the wrong thing so he has to cop it. Suspect the next player gets even more.

Clarko is a protected species, but this the AFL.