Elixuh
See you on the 9th green at 9
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2011
- Posts
- 36,203
- Reaction score
- 69,494
- Location
- Nerang train station
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions

Doedee and Kiddy have looked good but a way off seniors still
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Soccer Notice Image
Champions League - FINAL - PSG v Arsenal ⚽ Europa Semis ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - SEMIS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ FA Cup - Man City Win
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 11
SuperCoach Rd 11 Rd 11 Talk - Trades - VC/C - Pendlebury Comp – Win A Badge - Fight MND Comp Returns ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 11 Rd 11 Talk - Trades - The VC/C Thread
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
so if we go taller
shorter beecken?
is that the consensus?
Did Dev and Tunstill get concussed?
Bring in the academy kids.You'd think there's a good chance they'll both miss next week
Marshall into the midfield next week. A lot of emphasis on his handballing the last couple of weeks. Let's see what he's got.
At who's expense?
Tunstill and/or Dev.
yeah sorry i missed writing dizzyDizzy into the 22, Reville the sub
It's unfortunate for Beecken, but we'd be silly not to play Dizzy in the 22 when we're going up against Darcy and Naughton. I wouldn't mind Beecken being the sub, though Bruce is a worthy candidate too.yeah sorry i missed writing dizzy
taller traditional defence = dizzy
but if we go shorter is beecken it?
absolute no brainer this weekIt's unfortunate for Beecken, but we'd be silly not to play Dizzy in the 22 when we're going up against Darcy and Naughton. I wouldn't mind Beecken being the sub, though Bruce is a worthy candidate too.
Neither of those teams had a genuine second tall forward. They used Pittonet and Neale, neither of whom are that great up forward, though Pittonet did kick a couple. We also went short against Port, a team that does have two genuine tall forwards, and we gave up 7 goals combined to Georgiades and Lukosius. I really hope we don't go small.absolute no brainer this week
but interesting to note we went short against the cats and blues (albeit with gardiner as sub) so was wondering what we would do in that same scenario
Luko was taking uncontested marks from 50m and bombing themNeither of those teams have a genuine second tall forward. They used Pittonet and Neale, neither of whom are that great up forward, though Pittonet did kick a couple. We also went short against Port, a team that does have two genuine tall forwards, and we gave up 7 goals combined to Georgiades and Lukosius. I really hope we don't go small.
Did not see the game but looks like Marshall got hold of the ball a bit.
He had 19 handballs though.
Did he still play wing as that's an unusual high number for a wing but not for a midfield role?
View attachment 2365104
View attachment 2365103
