- Apr 11, 2002
- 38,376
- 41,457
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Iggles, Georgia.
& they only spent a week working that deal out - wow what a pack of ****ing amateurs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Most clubs would have just done the fair deal and took the player. Saints have trashed their reputation and gone some way toward redeeming ours.
Nah, most clubs get the deal done and parade him in the media as a big win. You guys are dragging this out with silly lowballs and making a rod for Jake's back.Agree that Hawthorn's offer is better than St Kildas. Hawks is fair, saints is obvious unders, clearly trying to exploit Carlisle's preference as far as it can go. I'm sure most clubs would do the same thing if situations were reversed.
One of those two picks can be packaged to GWS for pick 8, still giving us a top 10 pick while keeping one of our second rounders and an extra first rounder.Can we please stay serious, pick 5 is so much better than 15 and 18 and you all know it.
I hope like hell 5 isn't on the table but don't let your current frustration with St Kilda cloud your judgement, you look silly trying to state that you'd rather two picks.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I don't care if this drags on until the last day
Nah, I think 15, 18, 23 and 25 are a lot better than 5.Can we please stay serious, pick 5 is so much better than 15 and 18 and you all know it.
I hope like hell 5 isn't on the table but don't let your current frustration with St Kilda cloud your judgement, you look silly trying to state that you'd rather two picks.
Most clubs would have just done the fair deal and took the player. Saints have trashed their reputation and gone some way toward redeeming ours.
Seemed fair on Tuesday, not so much today when we're all but guaranteed not to lose him for nothing.Carlisle and 25 for Pick 5.
Saints are already backtracking on their words. That trade might happen.
Unless we suddenly trade for pick 8, which I personally feel is unlikely
Mark Robinson @Robbo_heraldsun 22s23 seconds ago
Breaking: saints ask for Carlisle and picks 23 and 25 for pick 5. Bombers say no way Jose ... On @superfooty shortly
People keep talking about 15 & 18. Why isn't it done already. What's the hold up? Just do it.
I wish it was ours.It is jakes fallback option..
I wish it was ours.
Nah **** them. They could have done that on Tuesday but instead they ****ed around and now they're paying the price. PSD is off the cards. Either they give us pick 5 or they don't get him at all. We have absolutely nothing to lose anymore. Based on the offer Hawthorn gave, I'm not sure how anybody could argue that pick 5 isn't reasonable for a team that really wants him...At least they finally made a ****in offer.
Let's meet in the middle, 5 for Jake plus 23, and end this rubbish.
One of those two picks can be packaged to GWS for pick 8, still giving us a top 10 pick while keeping one of our second rounders and an extra first rounder.
It's essentially:
pick 15, 18, 23 and 25
Or
Pick 5. Yeah no deal
5 for Jake plus 41 is fairAt least they finally made a ****in offer.
Let's meet in the middle, 5 for Jake plus 23, and end this rubbish.
Agree that Hawthorn's offer is better than St Kildas. Hawks is fair, saints is obvious unders, clearly trying to exploit Carlisle's preference as far as it can go. I'm sure most clubs would do the same thing if situations were reversed.
I'd even go as far as:5 for Jake plus 41 is fair