Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Paul Chapman said:"Now being at such a great club who have won as many premierships as anyone... might be one less I'm not too sure."
He still has to learn our history now! He wouldn't keep track of other clubs flags while he is playing I wouldn't have thought.Delist.
Chappy's gonna have so much fun on big footy when he can say he's got more premierships than you, wins every time...and if carlton fans chirp up just tell em to look at my sig...How to win Big footy Essendon style..He still has to learn our history now! He wouldn't keep track of other clubs flags while he is playing I wouldn't have thought.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
and given the No.3
would have given him 35 and Gleeson no 12 or 3
It's going to pull at the heartstrings watching Chappy running around for another club, but that's football I guess.
It's a great signing for the Bombers, and one that now puts you right into contention for the premiership if he can remain fit for the entire season. He's still got 2 decent years of quality football left, and at the same time I can see the reasons why Geelong failed to offer him a suitable contract, not that I agree with them entirely.
I'll be following Essendon a lot more closely next season and I hope Chappy continues on the path of excellence and quality.
All the best.![]()
Out of curiosity, would you as a Geelong supporter prefer to see him playing for another team (other than Hawthorn) or retire from the game? Assuming playing on at Geelong was out of the equation.
Not so much for the goals he could kick against the cats, just as a player in general.
There's one glaring issue on a common sense level, that i have with Geelongs handling of his contract. They wanted him to play about half the season and offered him a contract on that basis. Now the chances of that happening because of age related niggles is so damn high that i don't see why it needed to go into writing? And lets say he didn't get those niggles and just happened to play out the whole damn season? The result could well be another flag for ffs! I just don't see how your club could have lost out of those two scenarios, unless they actually believe that he has really declined in quality as a player. I only saw his finals performances, but based on that i cannot see a decline... It comes down to the fact that they were actually scared of one of their greatest champions playing out most or all of the season! It beggars belief.It's going to pull at the heartstrings watching Chappy running around for another club, but that's football I guess.
It's a great signing for the Bombers, and one that now puts you right into contention for the premiership if he can remain fit for the entire season. He's still got 2 decent years of quality football left, and at the same time I can see the reasons why Geelong failed to offer him a suitable contract, not that I agree with them entirely.
I'll be following Essendon a lot more closely next season and I hope Chappy continues on the path of excellence and quality.
All the best.![]()
There's one glaring issue on a common sense level, that i have with Geelongs handling of his contract. They wanted him to play about half the season and offered him a contract on that basis. Now the chances of that happening because of age related niggles is so damn high that i don't see why it needed to go into writing? And lets say he didn't get those niggles and just happened to play out the whole damn season? The result could well be another flag for ffs! I just don't see how your club could have lost out of those two scenarios, unless they actually believe that he has really declined in quality as a player. I only saw his finals performances, but based on that i cannot see a decline... It comes down to the fact that they were actually scared of one of their greatest champions playing out most or all of the season! It beggars belief.
He has been really good about it in the media, but i think it is outrageous that a club dumps a champion performing near their peak, unless it is because their bodies have become too unreliable. Apparently in his case, his body is not unreliable enough!
Out of curiosity, would you as a Geelong supporter prefer to see him playing for another team (other than Hawthorn) or retire from the game? Assuming playing on at Geelong was out of the equation.
Not so much for the goals he could kick against the cats, just as a player in general.
For purely selfish reasons, I'd prefer that he retired and remained a one club player, but it'd be a waste of footballing talent if he would have done so, considering I think he's still got a lot to offer in terms of high standard football...
It's a matter of developing some of the kids into the 30-50 game bracket. The club had no doubt Chapman could still perform, but the risk of him taking the spot of a younger player who needs the exposure to senior football for his development, then retiring and leaving our list vulnerable with more impending retirements was the motivating factor.
The need to stagnate the retirements and fast track the kids was seen as paramount. Chappy continues to play and Horlin-Smith, Smedts etc, are void of much needed gametime, and you get to a situation at the end of 2014 where Bartel, Enright and the like decide to retire and the balance of the senior side is unstable with experience. You're then throwing in youngsters with minimal exposure among players retiring the year after.
It was merely a list issue and the need to transition the list so that we give ourselves the best chance of playing at a high standard without bottoming out.
It's a matter of developing some of the kids into the 30-50 game bracket. The club had no doubt Chapman could still perform, but the risk of him taking the spot of a younger player who needs the exposure to senior football for his development, then retiring and leaving our list vulnerable with more impending retirements was the motivating factor.
The need to stagnate the retirements and fast track the kids was seen as paramount. Chappy continues to play and Horlin-Smith, Smedts etc, are void of much needed gametime, and you get to a situation at the end of 2014 where Bartel, Enright and the like decide to retire and the balance of the senior side is unstable with experience. You're then throwing in youngsters with minimal exposure among players retiring the year after.
It was merely a list issue and the need to transition the list so that we give ourselves the best chance of playing at a high standard without bottoming out.
I feel exactly the same the same way MD does. All of our club legends - if 'home-grown' from the start - should ideally be one-team players. Like said though, it would be a waste of Chappy's talent pulling the plug when he felt he had a lot more to give.
Older Essendon fans would especially have an insight into this when one of your previous no 3's in Paul Salmon left the Bombers to join f*cking Hawthorn, of all clubs. I can imagine that sticking in a fair few craws...
I understand needing to stagger retirements... see Aus Cricket Team for further info...
But I would have thought that a club legend who is still playing good footy (best 3 in last 2 games) is maybe not the guy you 'move on'...
But your loss is our gain..
Don't get me wrong i did understand the theory. I just think theory like that in the case of club champions who are still carving it up is absolute rubbish. If it wasn't for that high bump he probably would have given you another flag. Team f**king transition can go get stuffed. Kids can wait until champions are done. You guys might have lost a flag in 2014 in order to give a young guy a start one year early. It's over analysis and over planning in my book. It sucks the romance out of the team and club, when this team has shown that it can win on pure spirit already. Chappy personified that spirit.It's a matter of developing some of the kids into the 30-50 game bracket. The club had no doubt Chapman could still perform, but the risk of him taking the spot of a younger player who needs the exposure to senior football for his development, then retiring and leaving our list vulnerable with more impending retirements was the motivating factor.
The need to stagnate the retirements and fast track the kids was seen as paramount. Chappy continues to play and Horlin-Smith, Smedts etc, are void of much needed gametime, and you get to a situation at the end of 2014 where Bartel, Enright and the like decide to retire and the balance of the senior side is unstable with experience. You're then throwing in youngsters with minimal exposure among players retiring the year after.
It was merely a list issue and the need to transition the list so that we give ourselves the best chance of playing at a high standard without bottoming out.
Let's be honest, we'd be completely the same if Fletcher ever left,
In my personal opinion, I would have thrown Bartel in Chapman's position. Whilst the vast majority of Geelong supporters upon hearing this will probably string me up by the balls, and propel rocks in my direction, I feel the pace of the game has caught up with him.
Not suited to the backline or midfield due to his lack of pace, and was exposed on occasions throughout the season, and Chappy's a better option than Bartel forward of the centre and through the midfield.
If Menzel was available I could see the logic, but alas he isn't.
Like you suggested, our loss is your gain, and He'll complement your structure nicely.
Yeah cool, send him over next year. Thanks.In my personal opinion, I would have thrown Bartel in Chapman's position. Whilst the vast majority of Geelong supporters upon hearing this will probably string me up by the balls, and propel rocks in my direction, I feel the pace of the game has caught up with him.
Not suited to the backline or midfield due to his lack of pace, and was exposed on occasions throughout the season, and Chappy's a better option than Bartel forward of the centre and through the midfield.
If Menzel was available I could see the logic, but alas he isn't.
Like you suggested, our loss is your gain, and He'll complement your structure nicely.
Yeah, I'm with you, Chappy's gonna get 3 for free...funny ad this one..Disagree.
It seems 35 was an unlucky number for him. It netted him on average, a premiership in less than 1/4 of his seasons.
He and the bombers are both expecting an improved hit rate now in the new number 3.
Wasn't as bad for us as we got Wellman and Barnard in return for Fish, I can understand why some cat's fans aren't 100% happy with him in red and black, at least it's not poo and wee..I feel exactly the same the same way MD does. All of our club legends - if 'home-grown' from the start - should ideally be one-team players. Like said though, it would be a waste of Chappy's talent pulling the plug when he felt he had a lot more to give.
Older Essendon fans would especially have an insight into this when one of your previous no 3's in Paul Salmon left the Bombers to join f*cking Hawthorn, of all clubs. I can imagine that sticking in a fair few craws...
He still has to learn our history now! He wouldn't keep track of other clubs flags while he is playing I wouldn't have thought.