Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Reminds me of someone who should be playing for the Bulldogs.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
To be fair they've been doing it before this year.That Kommer does next to nothing and that TRB has invented a meaningless role for him to play because they like his attitude. The specialist zone filler, 10 pressure act, 2 tackle a game position doesn't require, speed, stamina or skill that is beyond any player on our list that isn't in his first year or a 6'5" + key position player.
If someone like Pears, Hardingham, van Unen or anyone else is in good form, but not as a forward, he should get a gig because basically anyone that can play football is capable of playing the same role by default. I see plenty of guys on the list who have strengths that would benefit to the side.
Took this from another thread, to keep it on topic:To be fair they've been doing it before this year.
McVeigh and Welsh both practically had a position created for them to remain in the side after they were pushed out of the backline and midfield.
Winderlich is the one that's taken that spot IMO, whereas Kommer's doing what Monfries was (defensive jobs with not much else to offer).
I really liked Kommer's games against Adelaide and...I think it was Richmond(?). His defensive pressure was awesome, and that would be enough to keep him in the side for mine.
But he hasn't really done that most weeks, and when you're not offering much offensively, that's not good enough.
People were on Monfries' case for a fair while because he was seen to be taking up a forward line spot that could be better filled by an effective small forward (Jetta, Dell) or taken over by a different sort of player (Crameri, Gumby).
Now that Kommer's doing that role, are people happy? Do they think he's an improvement on Monfries?
People were on Monfries' case for a fair while because he was seen to be taking up a forward line spot that could be better filled by an effective small forward (Jetta, Dell) or taken over by a different sort of player (Crameri, Gumby).
Now that Kommer's doing that role, are people happy? Do they think he's an improvement on Monfries?
Harsh.
Rest of the year in the midfield for the VFL team, strong pre-season and can play midfield in the AFL team in 2014.
Shows midfield traits and has something to work with next year.
Well he has a very limited skill set so I really doubt whether he does have any midfield traits other than attack on the contest.
Well he has a very limited skill set so I really doubt whether he does have any midfield traits other than attack on the contest.
10 weeks too late.
I raised the same issuesin the NAB Cup.
You must keep up with the times.
Hocking's probably the only one that I've noticed to consistently "run both ways".
Goddard's usually quite good, but even he has his few moments (pretty normal), likewise Howlett.
Kommer is the new 'Quinn'.
I don't agree with that.He would have to actually do the work to be an effective role model. What you see on TV is what you get with the guy, if it is all about pressure, he is woefully inadequate.