426 > Miller

[Theseventhhamster]

Sandringham:
Backs: Biddlecombe, Ferguson, Wheatley.
Half Back: Lamb, Warnock, Bell.
Centre Line: Motlop, Godfrey, Summers.
Half Forward: C Liddell, Smith, Gallagher.
Forward: Crowe, Sautner, Miller.
Ruck: Neaves, Jones, Poyas.
Int: McGettigan, Buckley, Gianfagna, Valenti, Hughes, Bode, Newton, Corp.

 

[Bartram_Class]

Re: 426 > Miller.

Surely if we consider ourselves a serious premiership threat, neither of these 2 deserve a spot in our best 22.

 

[Marns]

Re: 426 > Miller.

426 > Miller? Maybe in today's sandy squad, but there's a reason why Miller gets in the side ahead of 426, injuries aside.

 

[mcphee_is_a_gun]

Re: 426 > Miller.

Surely if we consider ourselves a serious premiership threat, neither of these 2 deserve a spot in our best 22.

I agree, Miller really didnt impress me at all gave away some stupid freekicks and also Smith was getting well and truly beaten until the last quarter when O'Keefe who had already conceded 6 goals to Sautner before 3 quarter time was moved onto him.

 

[AllStar7]

Re: 426 > Miller.

426 > Miller? Maybe in today's sandy squad, but there's a reason why Miller gets in the side ahead of 426, injuries aside.

Don't try to reason with morons

Miller was never going to play up forward with 426, Sautner and Newton all in the side. I love 426 more than anyone, but he hasn't actually got a kick in senior footy, nor has he played a game in 2 years.

So really, it's Mo >>>>> Miller >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 426 >>>>>>>>>>> Nicholson

 

[Theseventhhamster]

Re: 426 > Miller.

Don't try to reason with morons

Miller was never going to play up forward with 426, Sautner and Newton all in the side. I love 426 more than anyone, but he hasn't actually got a kick in senior footy, nor has he played a game in 2 years.

So really, it's Mo >>>>> Miller >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 426 >>>>>>>>>>> Nicholson

It was a joke moron.

 

[Supermercado]

Re: 426 > Miller.

Don't try to reason with morons

Miller was never going to play up forward with 426, Sautner and Newton all in the side. I love 426 more than anyone, but he hasn't actually got a kick in senior footy, nor has he played a game in 2 years.

So really, it's Mo >>>>> Miller >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 426 >>>>>>>>>>> Nicholson

He's had two kicks! Don't sell him short.

 

[Bartram_Class]

Re: 426 > Miller.

Two in 3 games? What a star.

 

[Pipefitter]

Re: 426 > Miller.

Anyone know how miller went at sandy? looked in the paper, wasnt among the best or the goals.

 

[Deestroy]

Re: 426 > Miller.

Anyone know how miller went at sandy? looked in the paper, wasnt among the best or the goals.

In short, he was crap.

 

[Bartram_Class]

Re: 426 > Miller.

Apparently 426 did pretty well though, a chance perhaps?

 

[AllStar7]

Re: 426 > Miller.

In short, he was crap.

Did you watch the game?
To say he was crap is extremely unfair. He killed his opponent, in fact, I doubt his opponent took a mark all day. Ferguson was better, because he got more of the ball while still killing his opponent, and was brave as ever. I swear to god, this kid would run blindfolded through fire to get the football, he is insane!

Anyways, he was not crap. He had a solid 4 quarter game, without being spectacular. My love child on the other hand (426 for those unaware), was ****house for 3 quarters and went mental in the last. Wish he could find some consistency though, beccause I wanna see him get a game DAMMIT!

 

[Deestroy]

Re: 426 > Miller.

Did you watch the game?
To say he was crap is extremely unfair. He killed his opponent, in fact, I doubt his opponent took a mark all day. Ferguson was better, because he got more of the ball while still killing his opponent, and was brave as ever. I swear to god, this kid would run blindfolded through fire to get the football, he is insane!

Anyways, he was not crap. He had a solid 4 quarter game, without being spectacular. My love child on the other hand (426 for those unaware), was ****house for 3 quarters and went mental in the last. Wish he could find some consistency though, beccause I wanna see him get a game DAMMIT!

Yes I did. Miller has developed a habit of pushing people in the back and then flinging his arms wide looking as guilty as anything. While not many were paid, at AFL level I think they might have.

Ok, crap may have been harsh. But I saw nothing in his performance that would suggest he would do a better job as a tall defender than Ben Holland.

Neaves on the otherhand did impress me. Obviously still a long way to go but unlike many other young ruckman he seems decent around the ground, moves well, and competes in the ruck. Much more impressive than the rookie ruckman we had last year and should get another year on the rookie list.

 

[StingaArmstrong]

Re: 426 > Miller.

Yes I did. Miller has developed a habit of pushing people in the back and then flinging his arms wide looking as guilty as anything. While not many were paid, at AFL level I think they might have.

Ok, crap may have been harsh. But I saw nothing in his performance that would suggest he would do a better job as a tall defender than Ben Holland.

Neaves on the otherhand did impress me. Obviously still a long way to go but unlike many other young ruckman he seems decent around the ground, moves well, and competes in the ruck. Much more impressive than the rookie ruckman we had last year and should get another year on the rookie list.

Saw the game on tele, and would have to agree with your assessment of Neaves. Looks like a good player, i was impressed with his tapping skills.