Post BF Upgrade Feedback - Click Here

Remove this Banner Ad

Past 47. Callum Moore

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aphrodite
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Should never have been picked up.
Should never play seniors again - don't care if he kicks 10 in the reserves.
Hopefully able to be delisted mid season.
 
menny said:
Should never have been picked up.
Should never play seniors again - don't care if he kicks 10 in the reserves.
Hopefully able to be delisted mid season.
Click to expand...
why would you delist mid season? At the very least helps with structure and options in the scratch matches.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Ricky Mott said:
Teague didn’t want Daisy on the list but happy to bring in Moore who can’t play. He’s a terrible player!!!
Click to expand...
I'm not arguing for him to be in the firsts this week. I'm asking why you would delist mid season.
 
Ricky Mott said:
Teague didn’t want Daisy on the list but happy to bring in Moore who can’t play. He’s a terrible player!!!
Click to expand...
1. relative salary
2. we'd have to let Daisy go through the draft before we could sign him to the rookie list

I mean Thomas retired, so perhaps his ankle/foot was pretty much done and dusted, plus it'd be hard to make a case for him getting a 2-year deal at another club in order to make the switch worthwhile for them.
 
Jimmae said:
1. relative salary
2. we'd have to let Daisy go through the draft before we could sign him to the rookie list

I mean Thomas retired, so perhaps his ankle/foot was pretty much done and dusted, plus it'd be hard to make a case for him getting a 2-year deal at another club in order to make the switch worthwhile for them.
Click to expand...
Sorry jimmae but we could have delisted him and brought him back or just kept him on the list. Fact is that the new crew at the club didn’t want him but wanted to get one of their own. Very much a downgrade.
 
Ricky Mott said:
Sorry jimmae but we could have delisted him and brought him back or just kept him on the list. Fact is that the new crew at the club didn’t want him but wanted to get one of their own. Very much a downgrade.
Click to expand...
In what world is Moore a replacement for Thomas?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Ricky Mott said:
Just a much better player. Moore cannot play. The fact that the coaches picked more ahead of TDK is even a bigger concern.
Click to expand...
It was for a different role. And I suspect TDK working on fitness after an injury?
 
BlueGum said:
It was for a different role. And I suspect TDK working on fitness after an injury?
Click to expand...
Not a different role. Last week TDK played in the same team as Pittonet. He played forward / ruck. Same role as Moore. Against Freo he played ruck.
Moore was a terrible selection.
 
I don't think we picked him predominatley for the firsts. He was there as a back up in case we needed forward cover., but mainly to be the seconds forward/ruck. We've just had a few forward injuries so he's come into contention as that back up.

Not keen on him either, but he's not a terrible selection if we wanted balance in the seconds side.
 
BlueGum said:
I don't think we picked him predominatley for the firsts. He was there as a back up in case we needed forward cover., but mainly to be the seconds forward/ruck. We've just had a few forward injuries so he's come into contention as that back up.

Not keen on him either, but he's not a terrible selection if we wanted balance in the seconds side.
Click to expand...
Give me Patrick Kerr any day!!
 
Ricky Mott said:
Give me Patrick Kerr any day!!
Click to expand...
Rather we gave some opportunity to someone on the list, than pine for a player gone for a couple of years ago. Maybe full forward is not Moore's best position.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom