Remove this Banner Ad

Current 4yo Boy Missing Yunta SA

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Police found a footprint they believe is Gus about 500m from the homestead. Not the one near the dam.


They’re saying the new footprint is unrelated.
 
They’re saying the new footprint is unrelated.

I'm confused. So they found two footprints and neither belong to Gus?

Could have sworn on one of the clips they said it's thought one of the footprints was his.
 
I'm confused. So they found two footprints and neither belong to Gus?

Could have sworn on one of the clips they said it's thought one of the footprints was his.
I thought the first one did!
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I'm confused. So they found two footprints and neither belong to Gus?

Could have sworn on one of the clips they said it's thought one of the footprints was his.
I think the one the other day was legitimately his but this next one is not
 
Yep, the first one is his the second one near the dam isn't.
The second footprint must of been small enough to consider it though.

Thats a fair hike too
 
Also interesting

“Acting Commissioner Williams said the discovery of a boot print had prompted a "significant search" of a dam on Monday, but that the "print was subsequently found not to be related to Gus".”
Oh apologies, I have to fix this. I thought they were talking about the original print and highlighted this.

“A tracker was subsequently called in, but police said on Thursday — the day Australian Defence Force personnel joined the search — there had been no further traces "of any footprints in the area".

Acting Commissioner Williams said
the discovery of the separate boot print prompted a renewed search yesterday that "involved numerous resources including STAR, Polair [the police helicopter] and a tracker".

"A significant search was conducted after a small footprint was located around a dam about 5.5 kilometres west of the homestead," she said.

"The print was subsequently found not to be related to Gus."

 
I don't know if if they're growing wool but I suspect they are as SA is well known for good wool and sturdy sheep, as I'm told by a Victorian shearer.

From AI which I'm pretty sure is correct.

Here is a breakdown of the typical shearing day in South Australia:

  • 7:30 am: First shearing run begins.
  • 9:30 am: First 30-minute "smoko" break.
  • 10:00 am: Second shearing run begins.
  • 12:00 pm (noon): One-hour lunch break.
  • 1:00 pm: Third shearing run begins.
  • 3:00 pm: Second 30-minute "smoko" break.
  • 3:30 pm: Fourth and final shearing run begins.
  • 5:00 pm: Working day ends.
Yes, and strictly adhered to!
 
Here’s a screenshot of the property from google maps, you can see the dams to the south. The only vegetation appears to be saltbush and maybe the odd tree. It’s hard to believe if he wandered off that the search crews couldn’t find anything given it’s not dense coverage of mallee trees.
View attachment 2448899


At the risk of potentially giving up the exactness of this, I'd be keen on seeing what the boundaries of that settlement was and if there are any indications of electric fences or just fences abounding in general.

On one hand, the vastness is such that you could barely pick up on any activity.
On the other, its arid nature and the arboreal absence would make one stand out.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

At the risk of potentially giving up the exactness of this, I'd be keen on seeing what the boundaries of that settlement was and if there are any indications of electric fences or just fences abounding in general.

On one hand, the vastness is such that you could barely pick up on any activity.
On the other, its arid nature and the arboreal absence would make one stand out.
Not going to be able to do that without a visit to the lands title office and then you’d need the ownership details.
 
Not going to be able to do that without a visit to the lands title office and then you’d need the ownership details.

Fair enough.

I'm just trying to think of any possible access and exit points the property might have and where they're located.
 
At the risk of potentially giving up the exactness of this, I'd be keen on seeing what the boundaries of that settlement was and if there are any indications of electric fences or just fences abounding in general.

On one hand, the vastness is such that you could barely pick up on any activity.
On the other, its arid nature and the arboreal absence would make one stand out.
A bit more info, it’s a 60,000 hectare property I’m not going to do the sums but I reckon the property must extend almost to the town of Yunta which is 43 km away. It’s a massive property
IMG_6484.jpeg
 
Fair enough.

I'm just trying to think of any possible access and exit points the property might have and where they're located.
The property is easy to find on google maps
 
A bit more info, it’s a 60,000 hectare property I’m not going to do the sums but I reckon the property must extend almost to the town of Yunta which is 43 km away. It’s a massive property
View attachment 2449253


I did look at the zoomed in screenshot but not thought to zoom out while on Google Maps.

If one was to run/walk off and continued to do so, it's evident there are potential hurdles/boundaries.

Those cracks look like river flows.

Either they're river flows or heavily deep hills which are potentially irretrievable without machinery.
 
I did look at the zoomed in screenshot but not thought to zoom out while on Google Maps.

If one was to run/walk off and continued to do so, it's evident there are potential hurdles/boundaries.

Those cracks look like river flows.

Either they're river flows or heavily deep hills which are potentially irretrievable without machinery.
The property is in a location call Grampus, Grampus hill has an elevation of 300m so I reckon what you can see are part of the Grampus ranges which I think are north of the property but there are definitely creeks running through there but wouldn’t have water very often unless there are natural springs up that way.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Was he really in the sandpit at 5 pm that day? Could it be corroborated?
A lot of people are asking when was the last time anyone else other than the grandparents saw him. This information could clear up a few concerns.
 
There is a lot of pressure on SAPOL as they don’t exactly have the greatest track record with large profile cases (rightly or wrongly)

They would have been looking at every possibility and would have gathered a lot of data (triangulation of phones, sms , emails , financials ) of anyone close to gus
Correspondence would be key in recent days, I reckon absolute triangulation out there would be tough but pings in the perimeter maybe useful.
 
I’ve located the dam they searched after finding the false footprint. It’s 3.5km west of the homestead. I’ve circled it so you can gauge the distances the searches are dealing with
IMG_6486.jpeg
 
On this, maybe it's low hanging but I couldn't help but think of Cleo's case due to what are, for me, similar environments.

Not understanding what you are getting at - I don't see any similarities in the physical 'environments'.

Cleo disappeared from a public campsite, on the coast, near major roads and not far from a major town, with plenty of unidentified random transient people nearby.

Gus disappeared from a private inland property, nowhere near any roads or towns, with very little water around, and only a finite number of readily identifiable permanent residents around.

Or did you mean something else?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current 4yo Boy Missing Yunta SA

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top