Nuggs Bunny
Moderator
- Oct 12, 2015
- 8,812
- 15,368
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Dallas Cowboys
- Moderator
- #2
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Is he the class player you want in the midfield in the future ? That is the question.
Sure Perkins or Parish are not that either but that does not change the fact that Tsatas will never be the class we need either.
As for his disposal efficiency. Handball efficiency high and would have been elite rating last night. Kicking efficiency was around average range.
Not if we can get Butters and Reid!Is he the class player you want in the midfield in the future ? That is the question.
Sure Perkins or Parish are not that either but that does not change the fact that Tsatas will never be the class we need either.
As for his disposal efficiency. Handball efficiency high and would have been elite rating last night. Kicking efficiency was around average range.
I just don't see him playing any better than Parish and I don't think either should be in the team beyond 2026. Might as well get what we can for them. With Tsatas, that means putting games into him. Parish is Parish. Move him on.Not too sure about getting a decent pick for him if he goes okay in 20 to 40 games. He will either play to a level we can live with or he will end up being given away as someone someone else may take a punt on.
Well even using the Voss argument and yes he has improved to be an average AFL player , it is till the same question. Are we accepting that average should be the future ? People say we need to move on from Parish and McGrath etc. Personally I am not sure we should be replacing them with another version of them.I am aware that Tsatas has some aspects of his game that he is working on. Not that I'm an expert, but he looks like he needs to do what Shiel has done, and take a few steadying steps when on the run to improve that style of kick. None of that young group (currently/recently in AFL side) is the finished product. The class we need isn't there anyway; Parish and McGrath (among others) are not going to be part of an AFL showcase video on precision kicking. At AFL level, Tsatas kicking is acceptable. I remember Patrick Voss playing VFL in the first few years - there is hope for improvement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I would say he has no value and if he is not in the plans past next year then move him now and work on the next guy via draft or trade.I just don't see him playing any better than Parish and I don't think either should be in the team beyond 2026. Might as well get what we can for them. With Tsatas, that means putting games into him. Parish is Parish. Move him on.
Who? Tsatas or Parish, or both?I would say he has no value and if he is not in the plans past next year then move him now and work on the next guy via draft or trade.
Average for kicking - with standouts in other areas... I could live with that. What does moving on look like, though? He has already been drafted and is on the list. Trade him for Harley Reid?Well even using the Voss argument and yes he has improved to be an average AFL player , it is till the same question. Are we accepting that average should be the future ? People say we need to move on from Parish and McGrath etc. Personally I am not sure we should be replacing them with another version of them.
You are describing Darcy Parish or Dylan Shiel. If you want to live with mediocracy then that is your boat.Average for kicking - with standouts in other areas... I could live with that. What does moving on look like, though? He has already been drafted and is on the list. Trade him for Harley Reid?
Both. It is like a trash and treasure sale. Clubs know we are moving on and some may pay a cheap price and take a punt.Who? Tsatas or Parish, or both?
Carlton might consider a similar sale. Maybe there's something to be found there.Both. It is like a trash and treasure sale. Clubs know we are moving on and some may pay a cheap price and take a punt.
I would say most would see move value in Parish as someone to take a punt on.
I think the chances of Tsatas succeeding in this league is low, but the downside to giving him a chance at AFL level is almost zero (not as sub or 50% TOG)Well even using the Voss argument and yes he has improved to be an average AFL player , it is till the same question. Are we accepting that average should be the future ? People say we need to move on from Parish and McGrath etc. Personally I am not sure we should be replacing them with another version of them.
I have said several times I want to see him play a couple of full games for a final look. Right or wrong it seems that they consider Parish has more of a future and obviously he is not in front of Caldwell / Durham / Setterfield. Maybe I am not too annoyed because the spot in the midfield we need filled is someone with a bit of class and quality.I think the chances of Tsatas succeeding in this league is low, but the downside to giving him a chance at AFL level is almost zero (not as sub or 50% TOG)
Problem with his kicking efficiency is it would straight up be skewed by semantics. He would do horrible kicks that drop 5-10 metres shorter than they should that ends up in a contest, which counts as effective, when you could easily have hit loose targets.
No current season stats available
Can’t do it at VFL level yet so don’t gift him games till he’s doing at that level.Just give him a go, he needs AFL football. All players have limitations in their game. Buddy Franklin couldn't mark above his head, Scott Lucas couldn't kick on his opposite foot... Tsatas is bloody good at getting the ball, it's his one wood, let's celebrate it. He now needs to learn to get it and distribute it under AFL level heat.
Why on earth would you trade someone who’s done what Parish did in 2021, for a third round pick all so a decent/good VFL player can play AFL games? Parish has had injury issues but in 2022 and 2023 when he wasn’t injured he was completely fine.I'm serious when I say this;
When Parish had his best season in 21 we could have traded him anywhere. Now we can't, but we can still trade him.
That creates space to play Tsatas. If we gave Tsatas 20-40 games gathering his 30+ touches every week, we could get a decent pick back for him from Tassie next year.
We are rebuilding. We won't play finals next year. Games into Tsatas is an investment.
If he works out to be the player we wanted, great. If he doesn't, some club would take him on his numbers and potential.
= picks for Parish + we know whether we keep or trade picks for Tsatas, but we will have maximised his value first.
Why does it have to be on our time though? Who would he replace in the midfield anyway?Just give him a go, he needs AFL football. All players have limitations in their game. Buddy Franklin couldn't mark above his head, Scott Lucas couldn't kick on his opposite foot... Tsatas is bloody good at getting the ball, it's his one wood, let's celebrate it. He now needs to learn to get it and distribute it under AFL level heat.
Because I've lost patience with both of them.Why on earth would you trade someone who’s done what Parish did in 2021, for a third round pick all so a decent/good VFL player can play AFL games? Parish has had injury issues but in 2022 and 2023 when he wasn’t injured he was completely fine.
The coaches aren’t blind, the reason Hobbs/Perkins keep playing is probably because what they do at training is better than what Tsatas does. If VFL form was the most important thing then why would they keep putting Perkins as the sub? Wouldn’t it just be easier to put him in the VFL so he can have 25 and kick goals? It’s obviously more than that. When the players compete at training, how could they not take into account who is more successful (at whatever their measure is).
Carlton might consider a similar sale. Maybe there's something to be found there.
So he’s good at getting theJust give him a go, he needs AFL football. All players have limitations in their game. Buddy Franklin couldn't mark above his head, Scott Lucas couldn't kick on his opposite foot... Tsatas is bloody good at getting the ball, it's his one wood, let's celebrate it. He now needs to learn to get it and distribute it under AFL level heat.
He has no physicality, how on earth is he meant to negate.Just has to be picked with 70% cbas every wk for the rest of the year now and in the last 4 wks i would be utilising him as a negator if hes not improving
Whats to lose