Free Agent # 6: Joe Daniher (part 1)

[eth-dog]

Brown is a possible out. Toovey will go to Crameri, Frost to Hille/Bellchambers and Reid to Gumby

 

[BrunoV]

I know Toovey can run but we'd be very happy seeing him go to Crameri. Surely O'Brien would be a better option.

 

[eth-dog]

O'Brien hasn't played defence all year + Crameri has torn him a new one on a couple of occasions in the past few years

 

[Keystone agony]

Its only time for JD this week if 2 of Hille, Hurley, Crameri aren't right

 

[The Prosecutor]

I'd trust Bellchambers to go head-to-head with Hudson and bring in Daniher as FF, allowing Crameri to (finally) play as the third tall that he's suited to.

 

[Keystone agony]

I'd trust Bellchambers to go head-to-head with Hudson and bring in Daniher as FF, allowing Crameri to (finally) play as the third tall that he's suited to.

Are you saying we play all TBC, Hille, Gumby, JoeD, Crameri in the same side?

Have to remember that its going to be a dry day and we are playing a side that isnt going to beat us for height but run and small players if anything.

I mean outside of Brown (in doubt), Reid, Hudson, Q.Lynch, Cloke - they really dont have much else and thats over the entire field and your saying pick 5 purely in just our front half that are that big?

 

[eth-dog]

Are you saying we play all TBC, Hille, Gumby, JoeD, Crameri in the same side?

Have to remember that its going to be a dry day and we are playing a side that isnt going to beat us for height but run and small players if anything.

I mean outside of Brown (in doubt), Reid, Hudson, Q.Lynch, Cloke - they really dont have much else and thats over the entire field and your saying pick 5 purely in just our front half that are that big?

I think he's suggesting T-Bell, Crameri, Gumby and Daniher(p)

 

[The Prosecutor]

Are you saying we play all TBC, Hille, Gumby, JoeD, Crameri in the same side?

Have to remember that its going to be a dry day and we are playing a side that isnt going to beat us for height but run and small players if anything.

I mean outside of Brown (in doubt), Reid, Hudson, Q.Lynch, Cloke - they really dont have much else and thats over the entire field and your saying pick 5 purely in just our front half that are that big?

When I said I'd back TBC to go one out, I thought it was clear that Daniher comes in at the expense of Hille.

Zaharakis Gumbleton Winderlich
Davey Daniher Crameri

R: Bellchambers

Something like that as a setup (obviously with the Zaharakis spot being rotated by the midfield).

 

[Keystone agony]

I think he's suggesting T-Bell, Crameri, Gumby and Daniher(p)

Yeh id be happy with that, i mean i wanted JoeD to play instead of Hille.

Why not against the saints they struggle with tall forwards, they had no second ruck anyway so JoeD for 5 mins a qtr wouldve been fine and it would have really given us a damn good look to see if hes ready for the pies, AFL and Anzac day (now we know none of them) it surprised me a little with that selection didnt think we had anything to lose but only possible gain.

 

[daffo]

I don't want us being too top heavy playing at the G. IMO we can't have Crameri/Joe/Hille/Gumby and TBell in the same side. One has to miss.

 

[The Prosecutor]

I don't want us being too top heavy playing at the G. IMO we can't have Crameri/Joe/Hille/Gumby and TBell in the same side. One has to miss.

See above, I reckon the formation that I suggested would be our most potent option. Especially if Brown misses and Reid being pretty banged up.

 

[Keystone agony]

I don't want us being too top heavy playing at the G. IMO we can't have Crameri/Joe/Hille/Gumby and TBell in the same side. One has to miss.

The MRP arent stupid (Well i hope not) and certainly Hird isnt, teams dont go changing to a completely new setup/structure if they are winning.

As i said only 2 of Crameri, JoeD, Hille will play in the same side with Hurley out.

 

[VelvetSledge]

The MRP arent stupid (Well i hope not) and certainly Hird isnt, teams dont go changing to a completely new setup/structure if they are winning.

As i said only 2 of Crameri, JoeD, Hille will play in the same side with Hurley out.

erm...

 

[eth-dog]

erm...

think he might mean TRB

 

[VelvetSledge]

think he might mean TRB

Oh well that's okay then

 

[Keystone agony]

Yeh sorry selectors, had MRP in mind with Hanley (bris) - not relevant ha

 

[Essendonia]

The stars are aligning for young Joe Daniher.

The sters ur alineing fer yung Jo Daniherp

 

[VelvetSledge]

The stars are aligning for young Joe Daniher.

The sters ur alineing fer yung Jo Daniherp

Ders merd mer lerf

 

[Zach Package]

as if you didn't photoshop his face onto her.

soniamdissapoint

 

[FlyingV]

as if you didn't photoshop his face onto her.

soniamdissapoint

He did...

 

[VelvetSledge]

as if you didn't photoshop his face onto her.

soniamdissapoint

Gimme some credit, I live on that bloody program

 

[The Bomb]

Danihers highlights in the VFL.

http://www.essendonfc.com.au/video/2013-04-22/btv-daniher-vfl-highlights-rd3

 

[yaco55]

Toovey will probably go to Crameri. Flexible player who can play on smalls and talls. We need Crammers to play deep and isolate Toovey. That means that Gumby will do lots of running which means that Reid won't be able to plant himself at CHB and command the area.

 

[Yoda_]

Toovey will probably go to Crameri. Flexible player who can play on smalls and talls. We need Crammers to play deep and isolate Toovey. That means that Gumby will do lots of running which means that Reid won't be able to plant himself at CHB and command the area.

Doubt Toovey would go to Crameri.. Toovey is a squeak who would get monstered by Crameri. At least quell Crameri in one area (strength or speed) something Toovey lacks both in IMHO.

 

[Ambrosia]

Doubt Toovey would go to Crameri.. Toovey is a squeak who would get monstered by Crameri. At least quell Crameri in one area (strength or speed) something Toovey lacks both in IMHO.

Toovey is extremely quick and at 90kgs I would consider him a reasonable match up.