Remove this Banner Ad

A flaw in Wallace's Thinking...

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

deliberate!!

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 14, 2003
Posts
5,906
Reaction score
1,843
Location
In Bake Jatchelor's shadow
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Richmond
Having witnessed again the RFC revert back to its diseased way of playing today at the 'G' while watching the second half, I started to think about the ethos that permeates the Team.

I thought, if Wallace doesn't ask the players to play the way they played in the second half, then as Leader of the Playing List what influence does he have?

If Terry doesn't ask the players to go short, sideways, backwards, handle ball to a teammate 2 feet away, what does he do when he sees it?
The answer: He tolerates it. In other words, he lets it continue without reigning it in, without penalizing the player, without halting the cancer in its tracks.
In a nutshell, watching the RFC Senior Team under the Terry tutelage so far, one can only come to one conclusion...
Terry Wallace TOLERATES the LAZY POSSESSION.
In fact he turns a blind eye to it!
The cheating possession. The possession-getter that furthers the individual in the eye of Wallace, yet forgets about the team as a unit that wants to move forward, to gain a result, to achieve, to win.

The team we have now is a team molded by Wallace that puts a positive spin on all flaws and individual selfishness.

Under Wallace, the effort is not in achieving, it is in the process. And letting the world know about it.
Under Wallace it's about being clever with an answer for everything.
It's not about proactive movement upfield to an end result...the goals.
It's about the journey for Wallace.

Our journey under this coach has cost us 4/5 years.
We never knew Wallace's plan was for a journey as the end result.
We thought we would have results. Weren't we fooled?

I smelt a rat early, with his weird dropping and constant bringing back of players, his persistence with average players, his tendency to breed a mosquito fleet (again, and example of the process being the journey for Wallace....not grabbing a big central forward, but carriers to no big forwards at all),
our lack of conditioning, our lack of passion, our lack of skill enforcement, lazy one arm tackling being allowed and Wallace's tolerance of players not 'gut running' and running hard to space, and Wallace's preference for playing 'pets' in the side, when they certainly warranted being dropped. All these were there in the early years of his tenure. Some got it.

Wallace's latest gem gives us another insight into his flawed coaching philosophy....
The coach said he had spoken to the players and put them on notice regarding their positions after what Wallace called a lack of “respect for the ball”.
"The ball is gold in the game, and if you give up gold you're not likely to get it back in a hurry”, he said.


The ball is part of the game Terry, like your teammates, the oval, the umpires, your jumper, your boots, your shorts. We need to respect all these things equally.

Terry, it's the GOALS that are GOLD in the game.
Once you understand that, then maybe, just maybe, all the LAZY, CHEATING POSSESSION GETTERS in our side, will point their asses that way and ALWAYS drive the ball in that direction.
We can only win matches with goals. Along the ground, in the air.
If the umpires and the AFL tomorrow decide to use a watermelon instead of a ball, then the GOALS would still be GOLD in the game, and getting that watermelon OFTEN and as many times THROUGH THE GOALS to beat our opponents would be the objective.

It's obvious that Wallace has missed the whole idea of our great game.
Sad for him, sadder for us.
Be patient Richmond Realists, the days of the 'process' versus 'results' confused Basketball Coach are nearly over.
 
most of the sideways movement was because there was nothing up forwards, the lions blocked the corridor and that is why they struggles so much. the bombers had the same issues last week against the lions. they dont have targets up forward that can take marks and they lack a livewire quick forward. the lions flooded back and clogged up the spaces, while their forward line was relatively open.

the midfileders need to run and carry the ball to create the opportunities up forward, but they tended to hang back too much.
 
most of the sideways movement was because there was nothing up forwards, the lions blocked the corridor and that is why they struggles so much. the bombers had the same issues last week against the lions. they dont have targets up forward that can take marks and they lack a livewire quick forward. the lions flooded back and clogged up the spaces, while their forward line was relatively open.

the midfileders need to run and carry the ball to create the opportunities up forward, but they tended to hang back too much.

Always an excuse....didn't I say we don't RUN HARD ENOUGH TO SPACE!!
There's ALWAYS space if you make one. And if you don't make it...You should be dragged....By who?....the damn Coach.
If there's a zone, where are we? If we're manned up....lose your man.
That's a LAZY EXCUSE. Or kick OVER a ****ing flood...to the back ass of it...AREN'T THE GOALS BEHIND IT??? You don't always need marking targets to get goals? You are allowed to kick to the goal square. Attended or not attended.
Isn't the action of getting the ball into the forward line better than letting Joel Bowden **** around with it for hours on the last line of defence, only to turn it over. We aren't brave enough, we are more interested in being reactive to zones, flooding, blah, blah.
Missed the point...
:rolleyes:
I wondered how long it would take before I pulled in an apologist for Wallace.
 
Having witnessed again the RFC revert back to its diseased way of playing today at the 'G' while watching the second half, I started to think about the ethos that permeates the Team.

I thought, if Wallace doesn't ask the players to play the way they played in the second half, then as Leader of the Playing List what influence does he have?

If Terry doesn't ask the players to go short, sideways, backwards, handle ball to a teammate 2 feet away, what does he do when he sees it?
The answer: He tolerates it. In other words, he lets it continue without reigning it in, without penalizing the player, without halting the cancer in its tracks.
In a nutshell, watching the RFC Senior Team under the Terry tutelage so far, one can only come to one conclusion...
Terry Wallace TOLERATES the LAZY POSSESSION.
In fact he turns a blind eye to it!
The cheating possession. The possession-getter that furthers the individual in the eye of Wallace, yet forgets about the team as a unit that wants to move forward, to gain a result, to achieve, to win.

The team we have now is a team molded by Wallace that puts a positive spin on all flaws and individual selfishness.

Under Wallace, the effort is not in achieving, it is in the process. And letting the world know about it.
Under Wallace it's about being clever with an answer for everything.
It's not about proactive movement upfield to an end result...the goals.
It's about the journey for Wallace.

Our journey under this coach has cost us 4/5 years.
We never knew Wallace's plan was for a journey as the end result.
We thought we would have results. Weren't we fooled?

I smelt a rat early, with his weird dropping and constant bringing back of players, his persistence with average players, his tendency to breed a mosquito fleet (again, and example of the process being the journey for Wallace....not grabbing a big central forward, but carriers to no big forwards at all),
our lack of conditioning, our lack of passion, our lack of skill enforcement, lazy one arm tackling being allowed and Wallace's tolerance of players not 'gut running' and running hard to space, and Wallace's preference for playing 'pets' in the side, when they certainly warranted being dropped. All these were there in the early years of his tenure. Some got it.

Wallace's latest gem gives us another insight into his flawed coaching philosophy....
The coach said he had spoken to the players and put them on notice regarding their positions after what Wallace called a lack of “respect for the ball”.
"The ball is gold in the game, and if you give up gold you're not likely to get it back in a hurry”, he said.

The ball is part of the game Terry, like your teammates, the oval, the umpires, your jumper, your boots, your shorts. We need to respect all these things equally.

Terry, it's the GOALS that are GOLD in the game.
Once you understand that, then maybe, just maybe, all the LAZY, CHEATING POSSESSION GETTERS in our side, will point their asses that way and ALWAYS drive the ball in that direction.
We can only win matches with goals. Along the ground, in the air.
If the umpires and the AFL tomorrow decide to use a watermelon instead of a ball, then the GOALS would still be GOLD in the game, and getting that watermelon OFTEN and as many times THROUGH THE GOALS to beat our opponents would be the objective.

It's obvious that Wallace has missed the whole idea of our great game.
Sad for him, sadder for us.
Be patient Richmond Realists, the days of the 'process' versus 'results' confused Basketball Coach are nearly over.




Whilst I suspect you might have had a few frothies? (or just angry with emotion?)... the grammar aint great;)

That is one of the most clever insightful posts I have ever read on BF

Well done:thumbsu:

---------------------------------------

I would add that some clubs have had great success with maintaining and controlling possession (yes Swans in 05&06...BUT more so Cats 07-09...but they kick enough goals!!!!)

However a "wannabe fraud expert" just trying to imitate that idea without the full understanding or the package that goes with it....produces the disaster that is:

Wallets Tiger Terror-ible 5 year f*** up!
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

most of the sideways movement was because there was nothing up forwards, the lions blocked the corridor and that is why they struggles so much. the bombers had the same issues last week against the lions. they dont have targets up forward that can take marks and they lack a livewire quick forward. the lions flooded back and clogged up the spaces, while their forward line was relatively open.

the midfileders need to run and carry the ball to create the opportunities up forward, but they tended to hang back too much.

While that may be true to a point, you need to be prepared for this style of play and change your game plan when required.

Geelong had no trouble the other week against Brisbane with no real "Gun" forwards. They worked a game plan around this tactic and won the game. Geelong's style of play allows midfielders and defenders to run through the middle and score. Richmond went into the game down two forwards (Richo & Morton) and brought in two midfielders (Cousins & Edwards).

Whilst I could not rate our current team to the calibre of Geelong, the game plan should still be similar or why make the changes we made?
 
Wallace was completely outfoxed by voss, who changed things around in the second quarter. wallace had no answers moved all midfielder and even the forwards in the defensive half and it got stuck there for 3 quarters. although the lions didnt score too heavily until the last quarter, neither did the tigers.
 
Agreed. Wallace for some reason feels the need to analyse and commentate on the game at his press conferences. I don't want to hear the story of the game. We all saw what happened. I want to know what went wrong and how are you going to fix it? Why after 4 years can the players still not kick and make the wrong decisions?

He seems very intent on re-telling the story via stats such as 'we had 1 more Inside 50, between halfway thru the 2nd qtr to the 4 minute mark of the 4th qtr, which if you multiplied by pi, would give you the avg ages of our team under 22, who have played under 50 games or less. If you do the math on that you would see that 33% of those contested possession were by kids who like long walks in the park and you're just not gonna win ball games when our structures not right.'
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom