Remove this Banner Ad

A Sad Statistic

  • Thread starter Thread starter old_clint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I'm not sure this is necessarily the best indicator of performance. For example, St. Kilda do not have a player who is doing better than Jamar in this area, and NM have a heap of players included in this index, yet they still perform badly. Further, Collingwood only has one player in there, and he just scrapes in at 47, so it isn't the end of the world.
 
I not sure this is necessarily the best indicator of performance. For example, St. Kilda not have a player who is doing better than Jamar in this area, and NM have a heap of players included in this index, yet they still perform badly. Further, Collingwood only has one player in there, and he just scrapes in at 47, so it isn't the end of the world.
Jeez, you're right :eek:
 
I not sure this is necessarily the best indicator of performance. For example, St. Kilda not have a player who is doing better than Jamar in this area, and NM have a heap of players included in this index, yet they still perform badly. Further, Collingwood only has one player in there, and he just scrapes in at 47, so it isn't the end of the world.
Yet St Kilda have 4 on the list as do Geelong. If there was a minimum 6 games qualification we'd have none. I had noted Collingwood's anomalous performance. Probably something to do with creeping along the boundary.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom