sr36
TheBrownDog
I've actually seen the experiment done what I and students perceive to be effectively. Elliott did it brutally though in a way likely to create trauma. Her methods and observations were really interesting from a psychological perspective, but pretty horrible from an educational one.You are so disingenuous. My response was to Jmac who expressed doubt about the assertion that billions in funding were directed to indigenous communities and issues. If I was cherry picking I would have removed the reference to the effects of colonialism in the paragraph I quoted regarding the government spending on our indigenous. It demonstrated the fact we do indeed spend billions. Why would I include pages of further information unrelated to Jmac's question? You are always looking for the opportunity to grab a "gotcha" moment or infer ulterior motives rather than engage in a genuine discussion.
Why do you seem so desperate to somehow minimize the genuine attempts of our government to close the gap and help our indigenous people with references to growing population -3% or the number of kids? Why would any of these facts be of interest to a cold hearted racist government?
As for your tired references to me being a teacher, I'll rest easy with the lifelong friendships of many students and other precious fruits of my career as testament to my worth in that department.
My students and I watched the blue eye/brown eye experiment every year and had some wonderful discussions. My overriding feeling was being concerned for the poor kids who were used as guinea pigs without any prior warning or explanation. I've watched a fair bit of Jane Elliot and must confess she carries her own bigoted agenda and huge ego. She clearly saw the feelings of the kids in her care as less important than the grand statement she was making. I watched her work with staff of corporations in later years and her abrasive, aggressive attitude toward the people (particularly one demographic) was quite telling given her propensity to lecture us about bigotry. But none of us is without a flaw.
A study into her experiment drew the following conclusions.
Academic research into Elliott's exercise shows moderate results in reducing long-term prejudice[20][21] but is inconclusive on the question of whether the possible psychological harm outweighs the potential benefits.[22][23] Two professors of education in England, Ivor Goodson and Pat Sikes, argue that what Elliott did was unethical, calling the exercise psychologically and emotionally damaging. They also stated ethical concerns pertaining to the fact that the children were not told of the purpose of the exercise beforehand.[6]
Measured results of the diversity training for adults are moderate. The outcomes of a 1990 research study by the Utah State University were that virtually all the subjects reported that the experience was meaningful for them. However, the statistical evidence supporting the effectiveness of the activity for prejudice reduction was moderate; and virtually all the participants, as well as the simulation facilitator, reported stress from the simulation.[21]
Another program evaluation in 2003, conducted by Tracie Stewart at the University of Georgia, showed that white college students had significantly more positive attitudes toward Asian-American and Latino individuals, but only marginally more positive attitudes toward African-American individuals.[20] In some courses, participants can feel frustrated about "their inability to change" and instead begin to feel anger against the very groups to which they are supposed to be more sensitive. It can also lead to anxiety because people become hyper-sensitive about being offensive or being offended.[19][20][21] There are not very good measures of effects on long-term outcomes of these training initiatives.[19]
In a 2003 study, Murdoch University included the "Blue Eyes/Brown Eyes" exercise in their list of "both successful and unsuccessful" strategies to reduce racism, as opposed to, among others, more successful strategies like dialogues about race, and the debunking of false myths. dialogues and de[24]






