Remove this Banner Ad

Aboriginal Shame File 1: Gary Narkle.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

just maybe said:
No, it's just because you're a racist.

Again, we're waiting on statistics of violence perpetrated by whites of the same social class to the Aboriginals you're citing.

As for warm fuzzy stuff about Aboriginals...when was the last time you posted anything warm and fuzzy about Aboriginals. NEVER. You in fact do the exact opposite, perhaps some warm and fuzzy stuff is what we need after all the hate you produce. :rolleyes:

Well you will be waiting a while. Are you saying that predatory, sado-sexual type crimes are in some way a result of poverty? Are you saying pshychopaths like Gary Narkle are the product of society? I will totally agree with you in regards to most other crimes like car theft, break and enter and even some kinds of assualts, that yes poverty and socio economic issues need to be taken into consideration, but people like Gary Narkle, be they black or white are wired wrong from birth. There just rotten. And while i dont have any stats to back it up (as yet) i have reason to believe that given Aboriginal people only make up 3% of Australias population there is a disproportiante amount of Aboriginal sickos out there. We accept that across the boad Aboriginal people have certain health problems, such as Kidney failure. We accept that 200 years of grog may have played a role in that. Why cant we then accept that the grog, the violence, the paint, the petrol, the appaling living conditions etc have all worked together to create 'damaged' people such Gary Narkle and Brian Edwards?
 
UNIT said:
Believe what you want. If you still cant see the difference beetween the Pickett hit and the Stenglein hit thats your problem. How Port Adelaide of you to pull the race card on that one... :(
Oh I can clearly see the difference Unit!

The Pickett hit was made with the elbow tucked into the body. The Stenglein hit was made with the elbow out and leading. The Pickett hit left a player groggy. The Stenglein hit left a player unconscious and with neck damage. The Pickett hit caused you to leap into action with condemnation. The Stenglein hit caused you to rush to his defence.

When shown pictures of the Stenglein hit after you once again got stuck into Pickett recently you made yourself scarce.

And you are the one who pulled out the race card and started a thread with it.
 
UNIT, that was the biggest load of crap you've ever produced. Show us statistics of this 'disproportionate amount' of Aboriginal sickos compared to similar statistics for 'sickos' among the white population.

Considering the number of sadists, sickos, paedos, rapists and so forth that we hear about perpetrated by 'whites' every day, I think it's a case of your anti-Aboriginal blinkers screwing you over yet again.

Petty and violent crime, separate from the 'sick' crimes you've detailed, have a lot to do with socioeconomic conditions and I'm betting the figures will be similar no matter what he colour.

But your statement that people 'wired wrong from birth' are more prevalent among Aboriginals is nothing but racism of the worst kind. You have NO statistics, NO facts and NO evidence other than a few random selections of Aboriginal sickos to back up your argument.

You're a racist, hate-filled individual who deserves no respect. What kind of lowlife scum takes a couple of news articles as justification to somehow claim there are more sickos among Aboriginals than whites.

Maybe you should stop closing your eyes every time you read about a paedo or a serial killer who is a white. It might widen your perspective a bit.
 
just maybe said:
UNIT, that was the biggest load of crap you've ever produced. Show us statistics of this 'disproportionate amount' of Aboriginal sickos compared to similar statistics for 'sickos' among the white population.

Considering the number of sadists, sickos, paedos, rapists and so forth that we hear about perpetrated by 'whites' every day, I think it's a case of your anti-Aboriginal blinkers screwing you over yet again.

Petty and violent crime, separate from the 'sick' crimes you've detailed, have a lot to do with socioeconomic conditions and I'm betting the figures will be similar no matter what he colour.

But your statement that people 'wired wrong from birth' are more prevalent among Aboriginals is nothing but racism of the worst kind. You have NO statistics, NO facts and NO evidence other than a few random selections of Aboriginal sickos to back up your argument.

You're a racist, hate-filled individual who deserves no respect. What kind of lowlife scum takes a couple of news articles as justification to somehow claim there are more sickos among Aboriginals than whites.

Maybe you should stop closing your eyes every time you read about a paedo or a serial killer who is a white. It might widen your perspective a bit.

I know the majority of sickos are white. I know that. But i say again, Aboriginals make up 3% of Australia's overall population. I anecdotally know of a number of situations in Perth, where Aboriginal men have r*ped infant girls. Of course paedophillia occurs across all socio economic divides, but im yet to hear about a prolonged almost epidemic of similar offences being perpertrated by non Aboriginal men. There is even a sick 'joke' amongst some people in a certain WA Govy Dept that these types of offences were 'cultural', almost an aknowledgment that it was a crime associated with a certain group.

I know its as provocative as hell what im saying, but ive heard about it from people who have dealt with this first hand. Im not saying only Aboriginal men rape infants, but for a while it was certainly an issue in WA. When the third incident happened in a month or something it was beyond being a coincidence.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

UNIT said:
I know the majority of sickos are white. I know that. But i say again, Aboriginals make up 3% of Australia's overall population. I anecdotally know of a number of situations in Perth, where Aboriginal men have r*ped infant girls. Of course paedophillia occurs across all socio economic divides, but im yet to hear about a prolonged almost epidemic of similar offences being perpertrated by non Aboriginal men. There is even a sick 'joke' amongst some people in a certain WA Govy Dept that these types of offences were 'cultural', almost an aknowledgment that it was a crime associated with a certain group.

I know its as provocative as hell what im saying, but ive heard about it from people who have dealt with this first hand. Im not saying only Aboriginal men rape infants, but for a while it was certainly an issue in WA.
So you've heard nothing about paedophile priests and youth workers nor of any instances where their activities have been covered up over many years or where their church has helped them to leave the country? You've heard nothing about abuse of wards of the state?
 
Toots Hibbert said:
So you've heard nothing about paedophile priests and youth workers nor of any instances where their activities have been covered up over many years or where their church has helped them to leave the country? You've heard nothing about abuse of wards of the state?

Of course ive heard of that. But the specific offense of infantile sexual abuse is what im talking about. Like i said a couple of years back, there was about three or four cases in WA involving Aboriginal perpertrators in the space of about 2 months. Thats beyond being a coincidence.
 
UNIT said:
I know the majority of sickos are white. I know that. But i say again, Aboriginals make up 3% of Australia's overall population. I anecdotally know of a number of situations in Perth, where Aboriginal men have r*ped infant girls. Of course paedophillia occurs across all socio economic divides, but im yet to hear about a prolonged almost epidemic of similar offences being perpertrated by non Aboriginal men. There is even a sick 'joke' amongst some people in a certain WA Govy Dept that these types of offences were 'cultural', almost an aknowledgment that it was a crime associated with a certain group.

I know its as provocative as hell what im saying, but ive heard about it from people who have dealt with this first hand. Im not saying only Aboriginal men rape infants, but for a while it was certainly an issue in WA. When the third incident happened in a month or something it was beyond being a coincidence.

So rumour, jokes and a couple of sicko cases are enough for you to make a call that sickos are more prevalent among Aboriginals...

Oh, UNIT. That is simply embarrassing. You're a very nasty, spiteful person. You're also a racist. Just deal with it.
 
just maybe said:
So rumour, jokes and a couple of sicko cases are enough for you to make a call that sickos are more prevalent among Aboriginals...

Oh, UNIT. That is simply embarrassing. You're a very nasty, spiteful person. You're also a racist. Just deal with it.

There not rumor or jokes. I am mates with one of the blokes that was a case worker for the families of one of the children that was assualted. Maybe i shouldnt of used the word 'joke' but it was more a sligh nod and a wink amongst the Dept when more of these cases happened. And again yes it was a couple of sicko's. But for three or four incidents of that nature to happen amongst the same group (not connected but within the same ethnic population) within such a short space of time, im sorry but you have to have a look at it. That cant happen without questions being asked im afraid.
 
just maybe said:
So rumour, jokes and a couple of sicko cases are enough for you to make a call that sickos are more prevalent among Aboriginals...

Oh, UNIT. That is simply embarrassing. You're a very nasty, spiteful person. You're also a racist. Just deal with it.
Exactly. I'm leaving this thread, I feel the need to have a good cleansing shower.
 
So you happily ignore white paedophile rings and child rapists because they're not Aboriginal?

Oh, UNIT. You are embarrassing yourself. You're a very nasty person.
 
just maybe said:
So rumour, jokes and a couple of sicko cases are enough for you to make a call that sickos are more prevalent among Aboriginals...

Oh, UNIT. That is simply embarrassing. You're a very nasty, spiteful person. You're also a racist. Just deal with it.

Im actually not. In fact id guarentee you that id be one of the softest hearted, most giving people you would ever meet. I just dont believe in allowing political correctness to get in the way of addressing social problems and issues.
 
UNIT said:
Im actually not. In fact id guarentee you that id be one of the softest hearted, most giving people you would ever meet.

Oh pull the other one! Hahahahahahahaha!

Oh yes! Best laugh of the day!

Haha!

:D
 
just maybe said:
So you happily ignore white paedophile rings and child rapists because they're not Aboriginal?

Oh, UNIT. You are embarrassing yourself. You're a very nasty person.

Where have i ignored them? Ive said again and again that by and large the perpertrators of child sexual abuse our white males. But i was talking specifically regarding the situation where there was three or four cases of infantile sexual assualt amongst the Aboriginal community in a short space of time. That type of situation needs to be discussed free of politically correct sensitivities. It is a child protection issue. Not a race issue.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

UNIT said:
Where have i ignored them? Ive said again and again that by and large the perpertrators of child sexual abuse our white males. But i was talking specifically regarding the situation where there was three or four cases of infantile sexual assualt amongst the Aboriginal community in a short space of time. That type of situation needs to be discussed free of politically correct sensitivities. It is a child protection issue. Not a race issue.

Yet the even bigger problem of white child rapists you ignore to focus on the Aboriginals that do it.

For you, it's a race issue.

Where did you post anything about the Church abuse scandals, far more endemic and dangerous?

Everything for you is about race. You're simply a bad person.
 
just maybe said:
Yet the even bigger problem of white child rapists you ignore to focus on the Aboriginals that do it.

For you, it's a race issue.

Where did you post anything about the Church abuse scandals, far more endemic and dangerous?

Everything for you is about race. You're simply a bad person.

Keep playing the man.

Im not talking about CHILD rapists im talking about people that rape infants. I could be wrong and probably am, but i havent heard of any incidents like that in relation to white people. For their to be three incidents in the sapce of 8 weeks involving a population group that makes up 3% of the overall population....Im sorry Just Maybe, but of course your gonna have to take race into account when your investigating the situation.
 
UNIT said:
Keep playing the man.

Im not talking about CHILD rapists im talking about people that rape infants. I could be wrong and probably am, but i havent heard of any incidents like that in relation to white people. For their to be three incidents in the sapce of 8 weeks involving a population group that makes up 3% of the overall population....Im sorry Just Maybe, but of course your gonna have to take race into account when your investigating the situation.

I have to play the man because you're the one perpetrating this junk.

You don't hear about incidents like this involving white people because you ignore them. They're all over the papers, clearly all you are interested in is vilifying Aboriginals.
 
just maybe said:
I have to play the man because you're the one perpetrating this junk.

You don't hear about incidents like this involving white people because you ignore them. They're all over the papers, clearly all you are interested in is vilifying Aboriginals.

Im not ignoring anything. Im talking about a specific series of incidents related to a specific group. Is that not allowed?
 
When it comes from you, with a history of focusing specifically on other racial groups in order to make broad comments about their race having an endemic problem, then no, it is not allowed.

You don't have a humanitarian agenda, your only agenda is to cause division and hatred by vilifying other racial groups.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

just maybe said:
When it comes from you, with a history of focusing specifically on other racial groups in order to make broad comments about their race having an endemic problem, then no, it is not allowed.

You don't have a humanitarian agenda, your only agenda is to cause division and hatred by vilifying other racial groups.

Who am i vilifying? Is it vilifying the sky to say it is blue? Of course not, its a fact.
 
You're treading dangerously along the line of Mr Crow's 'facts can never be used in a negative way' stupidity.

You vilify other racial groups. You always have, always do and probably always will.

The day I see you criticise someone who is white and point out they are white I will fall off my chair. But you won't. Only someone of another race will you make race an issue.

Racist. White supremacist.
 
just maybe said:
You're treading dangerously along the line of Mr Crow's 'facts can never be used in a negative way' stupidity.

You vilify other racial groups. You always have, always do and probably always will.

The day I see you criticise someone who is white and point out they are white I will fall off my chair. But you won't. Only someone of another race will you make race an issue.

Racist. White supremacist.

Id love it if we lived in a world free of race, where we were all just humans, but sadly thats not a reality. If anyone is racializing an issue its you. Are you one of these people who objects to people on Crime Stoppers being identified as Aboriginal? Is that vilification and blanket labelling of an entire reace as well?
 
On Crime Stoppers they don't use the crime of one Aboriginal to laim that Aboriginals have a high percentage of sickos.

On Crime Stoppers they don't have a history of making blanket statements about Aboriginals.

On Crime Stoppers they don't make rash, negative presumptions about other races.

You do all of those things.

On Crime Stoppers, they name race for descriptive purposes. White, Aboriginal, Asian, whatever. You name race only when it is non-white and only to make a negative point about that race.

This thread wasn't really about Gary Narkle. It was a vehicle for you to make stupid offensive blanket comments about Aboriginals.
 
just maybe said:
On Crime Stoppers they don't use the crime of one Aboriginal to laim that Aboriginals have a high percentage of sickos.

On Crime Stoppers they don't have a history of making blanket statements about Aboriginals.

On Crime Stoppers they don't make rash, negative presumptions about other races.

You do all of those things.

On Crime Stoppers, they name race for descriptive purposes. White, Aboriginal, Asian, whatever. You name race only when it is non-white and only to make a negative point about that race.

This thread wasn't really about Gary Narkle. It was a vehicle for you to make stupid offensive blanket comments about Aboriginals.

Crap.

It was about Gary Narkle and the people like him, who like it or not exist within the, shock horror, Aboriginal community. Full of hate for the white man, full of sado sexual urges to attack women. Yes there are white men doing the same things for 'white' reasons, but this thread doesnt happen to be about them.
 
No.

This thread wasn't really about Gary Narkle. It was a vehicle for you to make stupid offensive blanket comments about Aboriginals.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Aboriginal Shame File 1: Gary Narkle.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top