We're all hoping that Draper can be the ruck to save us from this nightmareNow I can breathe a sigh of relief - only Gawn, Naitanui, Nankervis, Blicavs and Witts left to go...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We're all hoping that Draper can be the ruck to save us from this nightmareNow I can breathe a sigh of relief - only Gawn, Naitanui, Nankervis, Blicavs and Witts left to go...
No one cares about taps
We're all hoping that Draper can be the ruck to save us from this nightmare
So your argument is because both will get beaten around the ground, there is no harm in playing the one that does absolutely nothing. No more stats from previous years, they're not relevant. Bellchambers is NOT that player anymore. Small sample size yes, but watch his games, scratch matches included. No second efforts and no marking option around the ground. When you watch the games, the only time you see Bellchambers is at a hitout.Then how about last year, where he averaged 9.4 hitouts to advantage and a rate of 36.9%? His first two games this year he had 18 HOA at a rate of 32.1%. That's the problem with the data off so few games, one game shifts things completely. Reilly O'Brien is great around the ground and neither Phillips nor Bellchambers will do anything to stop that but he isn't a great "tap" ruckman so I'm guessing we're trying to take advantage of that.
....combined with a functioning midfield to tap the ball to ...We're all hoping that Draper can be the ruck to save us from this nightmare
Tap ruckmen and midfields are so over rated. All we need is catapult run off half back and skyscraper kicks into the forward line on top of Tippaās head. After all, Seems to be good enough to win us every second game over the last few years* (*barring finals that is)Hitouts to advantage can be slightly useful if you actually have a good midfield. Which we donāt.
Not to mention itās a rubbery stat.
i would like to get off the cones. But watching this team makes me so insane i need cones not to have a bloody heart atttach. Helps me give a F less when we loseHeās absolutely better than TBC in that regard. Get off the cones.
My argument is that Bellchmbers is good at ONE area of modern ruckwork currently, as opposed to Phillips being good at NONE.So your argument is because both will get beaten around the ground, there is no harm in playing the one that does absolutely nothing. No more stats from previous years, they're not relevant. Bellchambers is NOT that player anymore. Small sample size yes, but watch his games, scratch matches included. No second efforts and no marking option around the ground. When you watch the games, the only time you see Bellchambers is at a hitout.
The argument is that Phillips (while also not great) offers more around the ground and can provide a contest, lay tackles and be a presence. Not a bad trade-off for losing avg 2 hitouts compared to Bellchambers.
Phillips isn't an AFL standard ruckman.Itās some solid list management that has you going into a season with one - one - fit AFL standard ruckman. And thatās Andrew Phillips.
Except he's not. Currently would be this season.My argument is that Bellchmbers is good at ONE area of modern ruckwork currently, as opposed to Phillips being good at NONE.
Phillips isn't an AFL standard ruckman.
Phillips brings a bit of bit of effort - as seen v Grundy & Goldy (2 of the better rucks in the comp)My argument is that Bellchmbers is good at ONE area of modern ruckwork currently, as opposed to Phillips being good at NONE.
Phillips isn't an AFL standard ruckman.
Okay, he has one viable skill as shown in 2 of 3 games this season, whereas Phillips has none as shown in 2 of 3 games this year.Except he's not. Currently would be this season.
And as I've said repeatedly less than 2 effective hit outs more isn't a sign of him being currently better than Phillips.
And before you quote it again, no Ethan last year or earlier does not count as current.
Phillips was completely and utterly demolished by Goldy. No ifs or buts about it. For all his plaudits against Grundy, Grundy was still comfortably Collingwood's best player, and as I said, if Bellchambers put up that game against English there'd be riots.Phillips brings a bit of bit of effort - as seen v Grundy & Goldy (2 of the better rucks in the comp)
He made English look like a superstar last week though.
Our ruck stocks are deplorable at the moment. The eggs in one basket approach on Draper makes me nervous.
Phillips isn't an AFL standard ruckman.
Grateful for this post - was feeling it was about time we moved away from the ruck debate and went back to talking about how probable it is that the crows will roll usWe are the exact type of 'nuff' team to lose this game... and give Adelaide their first (and potentially only) win of the season.
It will either pan out this way or we will do everything possible to lose it... despite potentially just hanging on.
Lowest collective IQ of any team in the competition. You can already smell the complacency from across the border.
We are the exact type of 'nuff' team to lose this game... and give Adelaide their first (and potentially only) win of the season.
It will either pan out this way or we will do everything possible to lose it... despite potentially just hanging on.
Lowest collective IQ of any team in the competition. You can already smell the complacency from across the border.
We donāt have a midfield either atmNot sure what you guys are worried about, ROB is an average tap ruckman at best.
And on the unlikely chance we do win the tap we still won't win the clearance because we don't have a midfield.
Yes he is. His last 8 games his opponent has averaged 19.75 disposals and 5 marks. Including some stellar players like Tom Hickey and, oh, Reilly O'Brien.
Youāre totally right but Iām not even sure a loss here would be completely nutjob Essington loss.
On paper this week weāre plain old sh*t. Injuries have really bitten.