Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My calculus sees Carlton short of a KPD to partner with Weitering and at least one 'real' small forward who can kick a bag on a good day - these shortcomings are structural and cost plenty against better opponents.Indeed. It matters not because the Richmond and Fremantle games were closed out anyway, by hook or crook.
5-2 with a whole lot Voss will optimise and improve on is a great position to be in.
I'm enjoying watching Carlton play these days because they can match teh physicality of any team and also run out 4 quarters - something which one couldn't say about the team sicne I started watching AFL.
Carlton managed to get its own VFL team what 4 years ago ? - that is how far back it has started from compared to most Clubs. Unbelievable levels of crapola management- impossible to develop anything or anyone properly. Now slowly working its way through players whose bodies are just not up to it...and you don't know until you know..."Run out 4 quarters" is a noteworthy factor, Pies struggling to do that this year but Carlton have been finishing well, that's my biggest fear heading into this game
On SM-A225F using BigFooty.com mobile app
-Hoyne says Carlton are not at a tipping point with defensive injuries that can explain this.
Not sure why we got rid of the reserves, possibly the dumbest and idea in the league's historyCarlton managed to get its own VFL team what 4 years ago ? - that is how far back it has started from compared to most Clubs. Unbelievable levels of crapola management- impossible to develop anything or anyone properly. Now slowly working its way through players whose bodies are just not up to it...and you don't know until you know...
Things like that have been fixed or (started) take time to wash through a Club.
Fun watching the growth and development.
I'll make my call on teh game tonight onve Ive seen the team picked.
I'm genuinely sorry to see DeGoey and Mitchell out - evens things uop somewhat but would rather benchmark against teams with best available playing.
Not to mention Doc.Missing McGovern, Marchbank and Saad from our back 6. Means spuds like Young, or kids like Cowan are playing.
Missing a host of pressure forwards meaning it comes out of our F50 easier.
It's next man up at Voss-town/Blues land, but the injuries are certainly relevant.
Both usually play well against Carlton.Not sure why we got rid of the reserves, possibly the dumbest and idea in the league's history
I don't mind de Goey out because he's been awful, if he's been carrying a niggle then he needs to get it right
Titch also quiet this year so far
Whole side needs to lift, individuals not that relevant at the moment
On SM-A225F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Even when not as his best, he's still a dangerous player and his physical presence still does help in the middle. In these sort of games he usually rises to the occasion.I don't mind de Goey out because he's been awful, if he's been carrying a niggle then he needs to get it right
Spot on.My calculus sees Carlton short of a KPD to partner with Weitering and at least one 'real' small forward who can kick a bag on a good day - these shortcomings are structural and cost plenty against better opponents.
The club is being engineered to be a regular finals team - the list is finally in a position where it can begin to actually develop younger players and the constantly not available due to injury this or that will be weeded out.
A flag or not is as much about luck as anything else - I think gone are the days of teams having player dominance or coaching dominance.
I'm enjoying watching Carlton play these days because they can match teh physicality of any team and also run out 4 quarters - something which one couldn't say about the team sicne I started watching AFL.
well he is going to be quite innefective , sitting in the stands ..Although I've tipped Carlton in a nailbiter, the points raised about Collingwood punishing turnovers (when at their best) have merit and no doubt they'll have analysed how Geelong ripped the Blues to shreds on the counter.
If Collingwood bring their pressure game and swarm on the rebound they can cut holes in the Blues even without a set of dominant forwards. The issue is how do they cope with Carlton's twin towers, minus Murphy who was an important structural player?
JDG will be a barometer as usual. When he's on, the Pies are tough to stop. When he's quiet or ineffective, they struggle.
It's shaping up to be a beauty, either way.
Yep, I probably need to start at least looking at the AFL website before a Thursday afternoon.well he is going to be quite innefective , sitting in the stands ..
Voss is under rated by most because he isn't DemosthenesSpot on.
"Flag or bust" talk is for losers coping with their club being cellar dwellars or also-rans scraping finals.
Blues are contenders and will be for a few years yet, and that experience is exciting no matter what any trolls would have you believe. But the more interesting parts relate to "control/improve upon what you can" and that's where Voss comes in and why he was so angry, not about personnel but what the players who went out there did in certain aspects. I am pretty confident it will get rectified and the players returning will just be the cherry on top.
Yes of course we're weaker without him, probably our 2nd best player and certainly our best inside mid, but I'd rather he sit in the stands than play in a restricted manner and/or possibly aggravate a groin injuryEven when not as his best, he's still a dangerous player and his physical presence still does help in the middle. In these sort of games he usually rises to the occasion.
"While the ball is safe, whether down back or elsewhere, then is the time for ruckmen and flankers and everyone in his turn to show his zeal and to take care that it is not capsized by anyone's malice or inadvertence; but when the defence has been overwhelmed, zeal is useless."Voss is under rated by most because he isn't Demosthenes
Another reason why should win is…well…Essendon.I recognised that in my post. I recognised that Collingwood will punish Carlton from turnovers.
Even Essendon last week destroyed Collingwood in the midfield and Collingwood still drew purely based on their ability to score readily from turnovers.
The reason why I think Carlton should win is actually because of the Geelong game. Carlton should have won that game but kicked themselves out of it due to their inaccuracy. If Carlton were more accurate, then the ball goes back into the centre where Carlton destroyed Geelong all day. But because Carlton were wasteful inside 50, Geelong took the ball coast to coast and scored with a ridiculous efficiency. They lost to Adelaide exactly the same way.
Whilst Carlton may be wasteful forward of centre again, I don't anticipate it happening. Even moderate efficiency should see Carlton win IMO. I also don't anticipate for Collingwood to be as efficient as Geelong and Adelaide inside 50. That's why Carlton are favourites to win and I believe they will. Whether they actually win is another story.
Since Voss became coach, Carlton have only conceded 100+ points 6 times. 2 of which have been in the last 3 rounds. He is definitely angry about it.I think so too. Voss isn't the type to let these things go and it was clear he was p***ed off at some of the defensive efforts. We may well be in for a more stodgy style of game rather than an end-to-end shootout for this one.
Losing your two best contested mids (imagine plugging JDG and Mitchell in, then removing Walsh and Cripps) counts for more than missing a few flankers of average-decent quality. The odds have adjusted accordingly. No Gov means little against Collingwood's KPF stocks.
Including Mitchell in the group like he's still up there with JDG, Walsh and Cripps ... Andy Millman's catchphrase springs to mind.Losing your two best contested mids (imagine plugging JDG and Mitchell in, then removing Walsh and Cripps) counts for more than missing a few flankers of average-decent quality. The odds have adjusted accordingly. No Gov means little against Collingwood's KPF stocks.
Well I tried to explain this with Carlton's "missing" forwards last week. It's not the same as Geelong's missing theirs. I was told that was a stupid argument because they would still make the team better. Mitchell is halfway cooked but Collingwood minus two of their only players that could be considered "contested bull midfielders" are definitely weaker than Carlton without their missing forwards.Including Mitchell in the group like he's still up there with JDG, Walsh and Cripps ... Andy Millman's catchphrase springs to mind.
Imagine losing two best mids?Losing your two best contested mids (imagine plugging JDG and Mitchell in, then removing Walsh and Cripps) counts for more than missing a few flankers of average-decent quality. The odds have adjusted accordingly. No Gov means little against Collingwood's KPF stocks.
How many at the same time? For what it's worth, I rate Cripps above Cerra. So missing Cripps and Walsh at the same time (or Cerra and Walsh or Cripps at the same time) is what I'd consider seriously weakening the midfield, rather than something you can quite easily work around. Not every midfield is blessed with that depth.Imagine losing two best mids?
Like Walsh & Cerra…Walsh has played 3 games out of 7, Cerra 2.
A few flankers of average-decent quality - AA form CHB McGovern & AA Rebounding HB Saad.
We won’t mention Martin, Motlop, Cunningham, Fogarty, Marchbank.
Let’s also not mention Docherty or Silvagni.
Poor old Collingwood for eeeevveeeer!