AFL live- Player Ratings

[Super Hans]

Just wanted to get everyones opinions on what you think the highest rated players will be in this game? My top players would be

Ablett- 92
Judd- 92
Swan- 90
Franklin- 90
Riewoldt- 89
Lake- 89
Goddard- 89
Pendleburry- 89


Some other players I reckon from my team are

Grant- 79
Murphy- 82
Wallis- 73
Cross- 85
Boyd- 87
Higgins- 84
Hahn- 75
Gilbee- 82
Sherman- 81
Williams- 80
Gia- 84
Ward- 80
Hudson- 81
Griffen- 86
Coney- 89
Hill- 80
Libba- 70
Hardgrave- 77
Minson-71

That's the first half of the dogs list. I hope they do the ratings like FIFA where only the very best get above 90 out of 100.

 

[JimmyMac]

Goodes would have to be up with those elite guys. Dual brownlow medallist, surely very high 80s. Although I may be a bit biased

 

[LionMen]

Goodes would have to be up with those elite guys. Dual brownlow medallist, surely very high 80s. Although I may be a bit biased

I reckon Goodes would be an 89

 

[LionMen]

Jono Brown should be up there with Buddy and Riewoldt

 

[Hayashi_62]

Eddie Betts 99

 

[HBK619]

Oooh what I could give away.

Will wait until Sunday before revealing anything, suffice to say there were some surprising ratings in there.

There is one large player that you're missing from your top players list cross, all I'll say.

 

[justlookingaround]

Bombers special
I don't actually know any of the official attributes for sure so I'm just guessing.
Watson- 85
Top attribute- Evasiveness- 93
Hurley- 80
Top attribute- Marking- 89
Gumby- 72
Top attribute- Leaping marks- 95
Ryder- 85
Top attribute- Ruck work- 88
Zaharakis- 73 (should be higher)
Top attribute- Goals on the run- 80

 

[gareth36]

Bombers special
I don't actually know any of the official attributes for sure so I'm just guessing.
Watson- 85
Top attribute- Evasiveness- 93
Hurley- 80
Top attribute- Marking- 89
Gumby- 72
Top attribute- Leaping marks- 95
Ryder- 85
Top attribute- Ruck work- 88
Zaharakis- 73 (should be higher)
Top attribute- Goals on the run

The entire essendon teams specialty:

Being beaten by 100 points by every team in the league and just all round sucking LOL jokes.

 

[gareth36]

Oooh what I could give away.

Will wait until Sunday before revealing anything, suffice to say there were some surprising ratings in there.

There is one large player that you're missing from your top players list d0gs, all I'll say.

That would have to be

Big bad bustling Barry hall.

 

[HBK619]

That would have to be

Big bad bustling Barry hall.

HAHA no, I forgot the intimation that would lead to being a Bulldogs supporter.

This man is considered larger than life in the AFL. ALL I'LL SAY!

 

[Biggy_Boy]

HAHA no, I forgot the intimation that would lead to being a Bulldogs supporter.

This man is considered larger than life in the AFL. ALL I'LL SAY!

Sandilands.

 

[Dangas]

Goodes 88

 

[justlookingaround]

The entire essendon teams specialty:

Being beaten by 100 points by every team in the league and just all round sucking LOL jokes.

Your signature is gonna have to be changed after the finals

 

[Super Hans]

Goodes should get 87+

Will be interesting to see the draftee ratings. Hopefully Swallow gets between 79-85

 

[Flameboy]

Sandilands.

Yeah. I suspect he'll be around the 90 mark.

Will be interesting to see the draftee ratings. Hopefully Swallow gets between 79-85

You're kidding yourself if you think he'll be rated that highly. 75 tops i would've thought.

Also to the OP. Sherman 81? AHAHA. No way he'll be that high.

Ablett should top it at about 93.

 

[Myki01]

Judd should at least be 93-94 being the reigning Brownlow medalist and all...

 

[Peck]

Matt Thomas at 99 is obvious.

I'd rather not try and give overall ratings for players TBH, would prefer to find out all the attributes, and try to work it out from there.

 

[melbournemartin]

It'd be nice if they had more of a spread of player ratings. Having the worst at ~70 and the best at ~95 seems like a fair waste of numbers. I'd only see a need for that if lower level teams (VFL etc) were included.

 

[HBK619]

It'd be nice if they had more of a spread of player ratings. Having the worst at ~70 and the best at ~95 seems like a fair waste of numbers. I'd only see a need for that if lower level teams (VFL etc) were included.

There's quite a big spread between best and worst players.

For example I believe the lowest I saw was around 50.

 

[royboy2]

There's quite a big spread between best and worst players.

For example I believe the lowest I saw was around 50.

Jake King?

 

[HBK619]

Jake King?

How dare you!

 

[Super Hans]

There's quite a big spread between best and worst players.

For example I believe the lowest I saw was around 50.

What team does The player play for?

 

[HBK619]

What team does The player play for?

Well, the one I saw was indeed Richmond.

But I believe most of the worse rated players in the game are ranked around that number.

I didn't really look through every single club and check every single rating, so the worst player rating I saw was the Richmond player since I looked extensively at the numbers there, I'm sure there'd be a couple of others ranked lower.

 

[Hipster Doofus]

For the tigers i reckon

Deledio at 84-87
Riewoldt at 84
Cotchin at 81
Martin and Newman at 79

Smokey: Shane Tuck at 78-80

But for other clubs obviously Ablett and Goddard would smash everyone else at ratings of 96

 

[irelander1994]

Goodes would have to be up with those elite guys. Dual brownlow medallist, surely very high 80s. Although I may be a bit biased

No, I think that would be correct. He's still an absolute star.