Your not adding anything to itWanna add anything to the discussion or just continue being a bald headed flog?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Your not adding anything to itWanna add anything to the discussion or just continue being a bald headed flog?
Says you. Feel free to tell me how a cooked treloar, inexperienced croft and louis emmett who apparently could have been a number 1 pick will make us a significantly better team next season champYour not adding anything to it
Interesting stats. Are they actually effective tackles? He's always looked kind of poor defensively and seems to run harder with the ball than without it. Regardless at his age and with his injury history I think all his numbers will start dropping.Good discussion.
For the record ...
Average tackles per game for midfielders in 2025 was 3.11
Median was 2.81
So Treloar's historical average was above that each year 2021-2024 (4.3, 3.2, 5.3, 4.7) and over those four years he averaged 4.35. In 2025 he only averaged 1.25 in his four games. But he was struggling with injury and averaged less than 60% game time.
His career average is 4.64.
If you narrow it down to only the AFL's top 100 midfielders (ranking based on Wheelo ratjing points) the average tackles per game is 3.78 and the median 3.61. That's a good deal higher than the number for all midfielders, but Treloar still comfortably exceeded that each year apart from 2022 (and 2025 of course).
As you say, there's no way Treloar would average that as a forward, but then no forwards do.
The 2025 average for forwards (source Wheelo, excluding players they categorise as midfielder/forwards) is 2.16 tackles per game but that includes tackles made outside the 50.
The average for forwards executing tackles inside 50 was 0.78.
For reference here are the 2025 averages for WB players that Wheelo called forwards:
Player----Tackle Avg----Tackle i50 Avg
Rhylee West 3.57 1.70 Aaron Naughton 1.96 1.30 Caleb Poulter 1.86 1.14 Laitham Vandermeer 1.68 1.00 Sam Darcy 1.53 0.59 Lachlan McNeil 1.71 0.57 Josh Dolan 1.18 0.36 Buku Khamis 1.93 0.36 Cooper Hynes 1.13 0.25 Jordan Croft 1.00 0.00
I can't say categorically but I'd assume they are effective tackles. It doesn't make sense (to me at least) for them to include ineffective tackles and then have no other stat that indicates the effective portion.Interesting stats. Are they actually effective tackles? He's always looked kind of poor defensively and seems to run harder with the ball than without it.
Regardless at his age and with his injury history I think all his numbers will start dropping.
Can't see how adding a cooked treloar improves the forward line next season
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Had a look at the pressure acts stat here and West is our only player in the top 65 of all afl forwards. Good teams like geelong and pies had 2 players in the top 5For reference here are the 2025 averages for WB players that Wheelo called forwards

And with that, I am taking my 4 weeks annual leave September 2026. How are the going to stop us?We are not going to become premiers by being a poor man’s Geelong, Brisbane etc we have to be brilliant at something and make them chase us. We are an outstanding scoring team. This is our key weapon and we need to even go harder on it.
Sure we don’t want to be the 90’s Cats who were all office and always choked in finals but like 2016 - we can plan a system around what we have and improve our defence. Jones is a huge loss but he was gonesky early. Lobb and JOD will improve and we will have some more genuine defenders in Buderick and Chuck Sellwood.
I also hope we use Williams and Friejah more to add star power to the backs. Darcy and Emmett are for 4-5 years away and so we hope Buss comes good or we see the continued improvement of Gardner (we was the no1 FB in the VFL and is definitely improving ) - at least things cover until one of the younger ones comes through as Lobb ages / slows.
Up the ground will matter just as much as we need to play much more pressure - the stand off nature doesn’t suit us and opens us up As a fast flowing team - consistent team pressure is still a winner - especially if you have a weaker defence structurally and want the ball to come in scrappy - rush and be the best at it. Be manic.
If we do we will outscore them. We already have scoring power. Add in Weightman, Trelor and developing Croft, Arty, Dolan and Hynes and we have a great forward mix. I am a fan of KUH but I like that we are more open now - Darcy gets protected by West - Naughty is up the ground with Artie and then Croft, Kennedy/Bont, Hynes and Dolan - is a nightmare. Arguably biggest change is going to be more of Bont up forward - with Richards, Kennedy, Friejah and Sanders we have the size and quality to free him up.
Garcia is 34th, Freijah is 35th and Sanders is 37th, while West is 50th. I assume you’ve limited the search to Gen Forwards which removes the other 3 names, despite them playing significant amount of game time up forward. Miers and McCreery are top 5 for pressure acts among general forwards, and both average 4+ CBAs per game (compared to Garcia with 7, Freijah with 6 and Sanders with 3, who are all listed as Mid-Forwards). So the position classification can be misleading.Had a look at the pressure acts stat here and West is our only player in the top 65 of all afl forwards. Good teams like geelong and pies had 2 players in the top 5
Well if you change what you consider a forward it sounds better but if you don't filter by position at all it's a stat that skews in favour of inside mids. Guys like Rowell, Libba and Dunkley are in the top 5 overall with significantly higher averages. Rowell's average is like double West'sGarcia is 34th, Freijah is 35th and Sanders is 37th, while West is 50th. I assume you’ve limited the search to Gen Forwards which removes the other 3 names, despite them playing significant amount of game time up forward. Miers and McCreery are top 5 for pressure acts among general forwards, and both average 4+ CBAs per game (compared to Garcia with 7, Freijah with 6 and Sanders with 3, who are all listed as Mid-Forwards). So the position classification can be misleading.
Four forwards in the top 50 sounds much better than 1 forward in the top 65.
Miers and McCreery spend more time in the middle than sanders. Why do they count as forwards but not sanders?Well if you change what you consider a forward it sounds better but if you don't filter by position at all it's a stat that skews in favour of inside mids. Guys like Rowell, Libba and Dunkley are in the top 5 overall with significantly higher averages. Rowell's average is like double West's
I don't think a slow midfielder/half forward like Sanders can play the same role as pressure forwards like McCreery, Schulz, Mannagh and West. Even Garcia and Freijah would be doing most of their pressure acts as midfielders. I think limiting the results to general forwards gives a better indication of who the best pressure forwards are in the comp
West also does occasional stints in the midfield. It's hard to pin the readily available stats down to what we want to investigate.Miers and McCreery spend more time in the middle than sanders. Why do they count as forwards but not sanders?
Sounds like you’re just shifting goal posts to suit your argument. If a player spends majority of their time forward, they’re a forward. That’s a pretty simple and fair criteria to apply
Do they though? They might average more CBAs but I don't think Sanders would be spending significantly more time closer to goal than themMiers and McCreery spend more time in the middle than sanders
That's what you did by including mid-forwards so you could argue we have four forwards in the top 50. Sanders, Garcia, and Freijah aren't full time forwards though. Just look at their goal and tackles inside 50 averages compared to West, Mannagh, Schultz and McCreerySounds like you’re just shifting goal posts to suit your argument.
If they spent the majority of their time forward they would be classified as a forward. You can shift the goal posts to make things sound better but I think most people would rate players like West, Mannagh, Schultz, Miers and McCreery as better forwards than Sanders and GarciaIf a player spends majority of their time forward, they’re a forward. That’s a pretty simple and fair criteria to apply
I counted them as forwards because their primary roles are as forwards. McCreery and Miers aren’t full time forwards anymore, why should they count here? You’re selectively choosing data to suit your argument, which leaves it open to being debunked by allowing for different interpretations.Do they though? They might average more CBAs but I don't think Sanders would be spending significantly more time closer to goal than them
That's what you did by including mid-forwards so you could argue we have four forwards in the top 50. Sanders, Garcia, and Freijah aren't full time forwards though. Just look at their goal and tackles inside 50 averages compared to West, Mannagh, Schultz and McCreery
View attachment 2504293
If they spent the majority of their time forward they would be classified as a forward. You can shift the goal posts to make things sound better but I think most people would rate players like West, Mannagh, Schultz, Miers and McCreery as better forwards than Sanders and Garcia
Would have thought Garcia's and Sanders' primary roles last season were substitute and bench. And when they do play forward it's more as a half forward which is basically a midfielder in our system. And that's just when our first choice forwards like Vandermeer and McNeil who rate very poorly in pressure stats are having a spell.I counted them as forwards because their primary roles are as forwards. McCreery and Miers aren’t full time forwards anymore, why should they count here?
Debunked? Okay lol. What exactly are you arguing? Our forward pressure doesn't need to improve? Or Sanders and Garcia are better pressure forwards than West?You’re selectively choosing data to suit your argument, which leaves it open to being debunked by allowing for different interpretations.
I mean that's basically what stats are for. Shifting the goalposts to argue we have better forward pressure than we actually do doesn't make it true.You’re selectively choosing data to suit your argument
Most importantly, you made the comment that Pies and Cats have 2 each in the top 5 for pressure. But two of those players, Miers and McCreery, play much further up the ground as half forwards/occasional mids (like Sanders, Garcia and Freijah). Either they all count, or none do.Would have thought Garcia's and Sanders' primary roles last season were substitute and bench. And when they do play forward it's more as a half forward which is basically a midfielder in our system. And that's just when our first choice forwards like Vandermeer and McNeil who rate very poorly in pressure stats are having a spell.
Debunked? Okay lol. What exactly are you arguing? Our forward pressure doesn't need to improve? Or Sanders and Garcia are better pressure forwards than West?
I mean that's basically what stats are for. Shifting the goalposts to argue we have better forward pressure than we actually do doesn't make it true.
Champion Data have been open about discussing about how their positional definitions don't really apply in some situations where players don't find a position or get moved around a lot, players like Freijah certianly fit that definition - if you consider wing, centre bounce, half-back, deep forward and high half-forward pushing to midfield to be 5 different positions, he basically didn't spend any fewer than about 10% or any more than about 35% of his actual time on the field in any 5 of those positions, and that was basically unique at AFL level generally, so any stats comparison to him compared to a player in the league generally is going to be an impossible task.Do they though? They might average more CBAs but I don't think Sanders would be spending significantly more time closer to goal than them
That's what you did by including mid-forwards so you could argue we have four forwards in the top 50. Sanders, Garcia, and Freijah aren't full time forwards though. Just look at their goal and tackles inside 50 averages compared to West, Mannagh, Schultz and McCreery
View attachment 2504293
If they spent the majority of their time forward they would be classified as a forward. You can shift the goal posts to make things sound better but I think most people would rate players like West, Mannagh, Schultz, Miers and McCreery as better forwards than Sanders and Garcia
Mid Jan update based on training reports
Budarick Lobb Jacques
Dale JOD Bramble
Davidson Freijah Williams
English Bont Richards
Jones Naughton Mennedy
West Darcy Croft
Carmichael, Libba, Treloar, Dolan, VDM
Think there's room for both Jaques and Carmichael?
What have you seen to suggest that Carmichael is good to go and play alongside of Jaques and others in the back line?Don’t see why not, Jacques was pushing for a debut last year and Carmichael is ready made for AFL
Treloar is far from 'cooked'. As a regular track watcher, he has been incredibly impressive in the recent match sims and has worked tirelessly to prepare for the season. It's disrespectful to tap out a throwaway line which is the opposite of what he's producing on the track. He was struck down by injury last year, having been an all-Australian the previous season. As all players in their final season, he will need to call upon his experience and continue to find ways of exploiting his strengths. Please use evidence to validate your views.Says you. Feel free to tell me how a cooked treloar, inexperienced croft and louis emmett who apparently could have been a number 1 pick will make us a significantly better team next season champ